The Infamous Commander

Perhaps it was not the empire that brought down Isaac, but the endless conquests that brought down the country. I've wondered before why figures like Alexander Caesar always died from internal assassinations. There are wins and losses in wars, and this kind of winning and losing may create peace. If Isaac really exists, endless victories will make the country's ambitions expand infinitely. War will spread indefinitely until the body explodes and dies. Like that kind of gambler, the most terrifying thing is not losing but winning all the time. Even a powerful country cannot refuse the temptation of Isaac, and even the strategy of using war to support war cannot continue to expand. The long-term continuation of the war is bound to produce war trauma and war-weary and anti-war sentiments, not to mention that as long as the war is fought, it represents a real loss of the country's population. Even if Isaac can fight to the end on his own, until all the citizens of the empire are killed, the war has no meaning to Isaac himself, and is more like an instinctive pursuit. For an empire where many social contradictions were revealed at the end of the rule 50 years ago, being able to choose to kill him was the best outcome. This was also based on the premise that Isaac had no intention of the regime and was poisoned as a military general. Regardless of the reason why the Empire chose to kill Isaac, I think it's pretty good. It's like a person releasing the devil trapped in Pandora's box and then closing it himself for various reasons. It's quite amazing. Because I find it hard to imagine how I could resist the temptation of Isaac. There is also post-war trauma syndrome. Sometimes I feel that the world is very strange, as if there is an invisible mechanism that prevents the war from continuing forever. Perhaps the entanglement between people's hearts and interests is a part of it. The scouts around Isaac 50 years ago are also very interesting. They came from different military, political, medical and judicial backgrounds. At that time, they defended the war and jointly served the war. What impressed me deeply was the red-haired scout. I thought he was a symbol of soft emotions such as love or romance. Until I saw the poetry he wrote, I thought it was literature distorted by war. There is also the last scout. The elder brother may represent metaphysical justice, but he represents the concrete legal system in that chaotic era, as bloody as the Sima family's rule of filial piety and righteousness. Isaac thought he was not suitable for the battlefield, but had to keep him in the end. It was really subtle. Sometimes the sword of filial piety was more invisible than war. I really like the plot of 50 years ago. Isaac is loyal to the empire. Why doesn't the empire always accompany him in a twisted form? Society or national consciousness needs war, and war also shapes social ideology and values. The country needs war, and war distorts and even drags down the country, but war does not have to be attached to a certain country, so the country kills war. They "loved" Isaac, they hated Isaac's ruthlessness, and finally they poisoned Isaac together. Sorry, the above is all personal. I like this work very much. It inspired me to think about a lot of strange things. I will always remember this novel.

I really don't like jj's design of not being able to reply to the author, so I put the author's reply to the previous chapter in the last chapter. Author, please don't doubt your own writing style. This is not just a half-sentence, because it's all about jj's article. Also, you wrote very clearly that as long as you read the news every night at night, you will have some impression in your mind. Of course, the Bible and the myth of Mesopotamia are indeed a bit far away for most readers. I also looked up the name of Isaac before looking up his surname. In addition, what I want to explain here is that there is no need to write an emotional line. Because you have given Isaac the flesh to become the concept of God. The gender of a concept god, or even a state, is ambiguous and neutral. For them, there is no such thing as love for their own people. You used three simulations to slowly strip away the emotions of Isaac as a human being. Why insist on giving an emotional line to Isaac who has become the real body of war? Isaac, who woke up on the battlefield, showed rationality and cruelty that transcended human nature in his analysis and judgment, and was abandoned by the three major schools who observed from the sidelines. This is the author's perception of someone who still has Isaac after you peel off the first layer. At this time, Isaac wants to win, but he still focuses on preserving his vitality to fight back. The two brothers that extend to his previous life trigger memories of past lives and bring out a little bit of kindness. The ones doing the cutting are the group of school instructors who both want and want. The essential purpose of war is to win and gain the control rights given by victory. In fact, they just ignored the last condition and equated this Isaac with the previous Isaac in their hearts. They were afraid that they would not be able to control such a person. When people face such injustice, they will get angry, question, and defend. But Isaac, who had been cut off, unconsciously recalled the previous questioning again and again until he found the official evaluation of himself on the Internet. All kinds of injustices had stripped Isaac of his anger as a human being, and what was left was the penetration of the truth and indifference. In the second virtual war, Isaac used his own method to gain command, either formally or informally, and completed the counter-attack against the opponent under limited conditions. Especially in the end, a day and night that could be called a meat grinder, the author once again used the method of winning by hook or crook to strip Isaac of his humanity. As a result, he was given zero points by the instructors of the command department and was considered to have a mental illness. In fact, after seeing the reactions of the instructors and students about PTSD, as well as Isaac's cognition in his memories, and the fact that Virtual War can be restarted like a game, readers are destined to use Isaac's eyes to see a situation that is both necessary and necessary. Precisely because Isaac has experienced so much, he knows very well that only victory by any means necessary can protect our own soldiers to the maximum extent, and the preservation of effective strength is our greatest human right in war. How can we understand the difficulty of choice unless we are in the situation. But in the eyes of instructors or superiors, these processes are not important, or they can develop what they want by practicing virtual warfare a few more times. For the third virtual hostage rescue, the trainer needs a group of fresh blood who are smart enough to complete the task, but they don't need to be so smart to understand the trainer's purpose. Here the author uses the trainer to peel off everyone's moral heart and Isaac's last bit of identification with the ethnic group. The Empire would rather kill all of them by mistake to deal with sincere intelligence personnel, and the Federation also uses the blood of youth to smear their war goals. In essence, there is no difference between the two national systems. What the Empire did to Isaac, the Federation can do the same. At the same time, in the competition, he silently guided the jealousy of one of them, preparing to break away from this disapproving group. The three virtual wars completed the stripping of Isaac's humanity and reshaped his nature of war. At the same time, Isaac smelled the coming blood in the virtual wars. At the same time, it also completes the trigger for Isaac to escape from living alone (a war will stagnate without resources to attract support) to using the ambition of the federation (the temptation of tilting resources) to complete the continuous war. The last three real human soldiers walked into the trap set by the war and were unable to turn back after being fueled by the conspiracy. Here completes the boomerang of this article about students not caring about PTSD in virtual war. It also shows in an extremely ironic way that the top management represented by Rebekah does not care about the struggles and choices of the lower-level soldiers on the battlefield. A flower grows crookedly, but why does this flower grow crookedly? Just like the empire holding the already smelly but beautiful seed in the palm of your hand. To sum up, author, why are you still struggling in the emotional line? The essence of war will only rely on resources. Just like Isaac once again became the leader, and Rebekah, the federal state body, was the scout. The war summoned will naturally become the leader of the state body. However, when the resources are exhausted, the scouts will kill the leader again in order to recuperate and recall the war again. How can you dig out a tiny bit of sugar here?

It seems to have been deleted. Please add it. 1. Character creation. Su was very cool, but he was killed by his scouts in his previous life. It may look a bit cruel, but due to Shou's mentality, I personally think it's okay. Shou has a lot of highlights in this article, or the highlights are all on Shou. The only bad thing is that the emotional scenes are written like shit. Almost half of them are played by Gong. When Gong appears, it's not an emotional scene, but to continue to promote the development of the plot. He didn't write the part I wanted to read, but the part I didn't expect was written particularly brilliantly. The author writes very well about war strategy and combat. You can feel that Shou is a very good person, very personal charm, and has a very personal style. However, Shou's past life events are not explained very well, because the author has been inserting narratives to write about his past life, so his perspective is limited. How can I put it? In fact, I really want to see the regrets of the scouts. Not to mention chasing their wives and crematoriums, at least their consciences will hurt. (Now it seems that this idea is very unrealistic, because this kind of game is basically a game of interests. When the losses are greater than the gains, everyone's choices will change.) It is good for them to suffer in their previous life. There is a point in it that is not very "readable" (not that the writing is bad, but that the writing is very practical), that is, Shou was a general, but his achievements were all wiped out because the country was defeated after his death. The defeated countries merged, and after the merger, the people in the country particularly hated Shou. Of course, it was also written in the article, and there were still people who supported Shou, but the proportion was not very large. Eg① "What is he like in your heart that you voluntarily tattooed the other clan's mark on your body? Isaac asked. Ug looked at Qingyang Jiang first and answered his question about the idol, "I deeply love and worship Isaac Atrahasis, this is his clan mark." There are some places in the article that are actually based on history. What really shocked me is that the author's views on the war are very penetrating. The author/sufferer is a classic anti-defeat person, not an anti-war person (as shown in the article), although the people are very hateful. Hate Shou, but Shou was not actually the culprit of the defeat. On the contrary, he could always win the war, but later he was killed by his scouts, and the situation was over. Therefore, the country's defeat is an inevitable trend, but the people will not hate themselves, or direct conflicts against their superiors (National Liberation Army) They need more specific people or things to bear their anger and vent their emotions, so they choose to hate Shou. Shou has a very awesome attitude here. He feels that it doesn't matter. He just feels a little confused that his achievements have been wiped out. He also He didn't expect that after he was poisoned by the scouts, the country would be defeated. In fact, Shou didn't really care about the people's attitude towards him. He cared more about the outcome of the war. This will be written in the extra story later. In fact, Shou is not a person at all. He cannot be regarded as a specific person. He is a symbol of war. Eg②This sculpture was originally cast by the empire for a general. But later the empire disintegrated. After Gubola was accepted by Theo, in order to draw a clear line with the empire, he cut off the face of the sculpture and smoothed it, changed the name, and declared that it was a monument to commemorate the anti-imperial war. "If you ask me, that's right. After all, it's too huge, and it would be a waste to bulldoze it. At this point, Rebekah looked at Isaac with a gentle smile, her pink dove pupils stared at Isaac closely, and said, "Do you know the name of that general? " Eg③War, leaders and scouts. The world would go on without Isaac Atrahasis. Eg④ Isaac glanced hastily and looked away. He didn't care about history's evaluation of himself. He is even a little arrogant and thinks that the history books will have some criticisms of his evaluation, but more praises. For example, how many battles did Isaac Atrahasis win, how cleverly led the empire to defeat the United States, and continued the empire's century-long rule, etc. Maybe there is still some regret, because in the end he was poisoned and died. His birth is the starting point of the war, his death is the symbol of the end of the war, and his rebirth is also the beginning of the war. Shou is the kind of person who likes war very much, a militant, and he is very good at commanding, so he can win every war he participates in. This point may be very abstract. Gong is actually not a specific person. Gong is the representative of a country, the will of a country. The country needs war, so he will like Shou, Shou just wants to keep fighting, so Shou must rely on the country. 2. Author After talking about the plot, let's talk about the author, Da Da. This Da Da Da is constantly interrupted for three or four days, or five or six days. Although the writing is really good, the emotional line is flawed, and the frequency of updates is also very painful. The article that was published in January 2024 was just finished this month ago. Oh my God, the extra chapter is not finished yet. I hope the author Da Da can quickly write the extra chapter to explain more things. I think many places he writes are too obscure. 3. A little addition. About the attitude towards sacrifices and people's lives in war. In short, Shou doesn't care, because war is so ruthless. He won't change just because more people die in your country and less in his country. Shou will only feel that there are not enough people involved, and the participants in the war are not big enough. Shou is a very cold person, cold but not cold-blooded. He still has a little conscience, but not much. The specific manifestation is that he sometimes covets his previous life. I think it has something to do with the power and achievements he has achieved in his previous life. Shou will be reborn in this life. Lai actually doesn't want to fight, he just wants to live alone and find a remote place to spend his life. But as I said before, Shou's rebirth is actually a symbol of the war breaking out again, so Shou's rebirth is destined to provoke another war. It cannot be said that she started it. It was driven by many factors and factors, but Shou's actions were the last straw. This is the first time I have experienced the charm of this kind of drama novel, especially since the author has references when writing this. Eg⑤International law of war, you can say that it has little effect, but without it it would be another matter. Bottomless and unprincipled violence will only accelerate towards crazy destruction. "War also has its laws. The profound lessons that mankind has learned after experiencing many wars and blood and tears will never be a piece of paper. To acquiesce that everything in war is understandable also implies extreme evil. " Eg⑥Do you feel unbearable or regretful when you reflect on yourself now? Isaac had no regrets. Not even a tiny bit. The fear and blood and tears of the Theo people were still just coordinates on the map that needed to be cleared in the eyes of his imperial soldiers. That memory is like a faded battle report, cold, precise, without a trace of ripples. In other words, he thought Theo would treat Imperial prisoners of war like this. Eg⑦If it were not for the porridge, Isaac recalled every detail of the starting point, especially the sad expression of Lannot wanting to kill him and asking him "if he had the heart" during the celebration dance, Isaac would definitely ignore the twins and walk away. The tens of millions of debts will be He had been burdened with the twins for a lifetime, but it had nothing to do with him. But he... Softened his heart again. Isaac understood that this was because his guilt had been transferred to the twins. Maybe he wanted to prove that Lannot's words of "no heart" were misunderstandings or angry words. I am only rational, not ruthless. As for the people's attitude towards war, I actually think their attitude towards war is the same as Shou's. It may be a bit cold-blooded to say this, but it is true. They are not anti-war, but anti-defeat. The reason why they hate Shou so much is because they were defeated in the end (although they were not defeated because of Shou). As long as they defeat him They definitely do not have this attitude. The author explained the details of this in a subtle way in the article. In fact, they have been invading and attacking, but they do not feel that they are bloody or guilty. They only feel that all this is what they should do, and as long as they win the war, history will be written by the victors. Eg⑧When the double-headed eagle flag rolls over the scorched earth, the flames of our guns are the morning bell of the restart of civilization! Look! The ballistic plows through the thorns of the wilderness, and every lead mark blooms the rose of the empire. But remember - our guns have never been stained with a drop of innocent blood, and our feet have never stepped into the mire of massacre. The truth will be engraved on the judgment pillar of history - and now, we have to go out alive and engrave it! There are also those few scouts. Novels on this theme are rare (a bit like a combination of bo and whistle) but I like it very much. Shou is a leader. In fact, they poison and kill Shou later, which reflects a country's change in its view of war. At first, they need Shou and cultivate Shou because they need to go to war to plunder. Later, they poison Shou because they can no longer afford the losses of continuing the war. Of course, there are also personal emotional factors in it. I think the macro of this novel is The visual imagery is very exciting, but there are still a lot of details that need to be polished. If there is no extra article and some explanations, you really won't be able to see many details and metaphors. I don't think it is a problem with the author's writing skills. Although updates are often interrupted, the writing before and after the interruption is almost the same. It is that the author's level has not been affected too much. I think it is more because the author has not written enough articles, so his awareness of this aspect is not strong enough. In short, the author is not experienced enough.

It's so amazing, I'm reading this article even while I'm eating!!! Love you, boss. In fact, there are many routines about resurrecting as another person after death, but this is a skeleton. The most important thing is what kind of flesh and blood the author fills into it. Whether it is the behavior of the soldiers, their psychological state, or the overall strategy of the war, they write far better than other conventional articles. It can be seen that the author's writing power is profound, which completely saved my book shortage. Moreover, the personal charm of the male protagonist is super strong, and the combat power system has not collapsed like the male channel. The memories interspersed from time to time have the feeling of a movie. Full marks for a masterpiece!!! Please write more articles like this, I will always follow your boss!

A great article, although there are some things I don't fully understand I thought that Jinjiang's list was too impetuous now. After seeing the big word "rat", I felt that the plot and other developments were very novel and unconventional, so I naturally started this article. I glanced at the introduction and thought it was a story about reincarnation, where I dominate the military academy with my past life memories and abilities, and uncover the past injustices that have been buried in the dust (? Etc.), But it turned out to be a sharp turn and drifted to a place I had never thought of. The article describes three main battles. In fact, I thought they were the beginning of the story, and the later college chapter or the direction after graduation. I didn't expect that the speed of becoming a god was too fast. The three battles were all his personal battles. In the first battle, Isaac was reborn on the simulated battlefield. He thought it was a real battlefield, so he killed the commander. He was tired but slowly began to join the war. In order to win, the war slowly lit up his silent soul, but he was considered to have an extreme personality (? He would do anything and enjoy war indifferently, so he was not suitable to be a soldier. Here, his scouts are slowly mentioned through memories. It should be said that they are the ones who awakened the war. The older companions, Hong Mo, the noble son, Green (Ao, no wonder Green's extras are all the memories of Ao, it turns out that the real Green has long been buried there), the intelligence collector, the pretender who deceived the enemy with a weak appearance and brutally tortured him. In the memory chapter, we can feel the respect and yearning the scouts have for Isaac, so why did they poison Isaac in the end? This is a question that runs through the article for a long time. It can be said that the memoir is basically for this question. From the perspective of the text, perhaps because the scouts suffered heavy casualties, one lost his arm and the other became a cripple, but the protagonist still remained rational for the war, which seemed to the scouts to be ruthless, so the protagonist had no heart. Although in the end it was not explicitly stated in the article why he poisoned the leader, it was speculated that it was because of these reasons; metaphorically speaking, the injury of the scouts represents the weakening of the country's strength and cannot continue to support the war, so the war must be stopped and the protagonist who represents the war must be killed. Then, through the promotion of a mastermind behind the scenes, the protagonist had no choice but to enter the military academy and usher in the entrance exam, which is the second war. In the second war, the protagonist lost his memory and relied on instinct. He started to seize power as a soldier and fought with the enemy. However, in the end he killed the hesitant deputy commander and became a failure in the eyes of the examiner. From the perspective of war, it is for better victory and to clear the consequences, but from the perspective of human nature, it is too cruel, and there has always been such a conflict in the article, the cruelty of war and the warmth of human nature. War is cold and ruthless, but it is only possible to make judgments by staying out of the situation. When facing this kind of situation, maybe the protagonist's approach is correct (?) Maybe this is why there are so many post-war traumas? In the face of war, he did everything for the sake of victory, but after breaking away from the coldness and returning to society and humanity, he could not forget this kind of mental harm and contradiction. The third war is also the most cruel one. The mouth of the dead is the harshest. Give up your life for the empire. It's too cruel and too realistic, and the manslaughter incident in the final real rescue is full of irony. At the end, I was very surprised that it ended like this, but after reading the comments section, everyone felt that it seemed like it should end here, because what follows is just a repeat of history, starting wars, leading wars, stopping wars, and waiting for the next war to come. After reading it, although I still barely understood many of the metaphors, my heart was still heavy. I seemed to be thinking about something, but I couldn't think of anything. I felt a little melancholy. I didn't expect it to be such a realistic and cruel story. Who still remembers that I originally wanted to read an interstellar novel? All in all, the author is awesome. I have never seen such a war scene in Jinjiang. It's so awesome.

It's very interesting. I no longer care about the love and affection of the scouts who cared about Isaac's past life. I directly regard the scouts as politicians or national organizations who need to use war to divide their interests.

It was a very interesting article, but it ended too quickly. I feel like there is still a lot more that could be written about Isaac... Even though I know that Isaac is a war concept, I still really want to see the story of the imperial version of the leader and his group of scouts, so I like Green's extras, and I really want to have more similar ones [changed]

I stayed up two nights to read this book. Reader 685283's analysis is excellent! I was still looking forward to how Isaac would break the situation in the third "support", but he didn't need to do anything, he had become it and him, leaving behind the sorrow and joy, leaving only pure struggle. War will never die, because human desires are never-ending, and peace is just a fleeting moment. The story escalates to the point where Isaac becomes a god, and the expectations placed on him by the nearly insane human soldiers in the previous paragraph become very ridiculous. How can one aspire to the recognition of war? So many civilians have become victims of the brutal killings, whether legal or illegal. Killing is killing. They had let them go, and they could never leave from here.

It's so fun to mess with, the author writes well! ! You can't help but read it in one sitting! Um. Great, it's finished, no need to wait for serialization! The author's style is very unique, and few people write in such a detailed and straightforward way. I think Isaac is a bit inconsistent, um... Getting more and more fanatical about war? Is this an expression of his transformation into "war"? Also, there are really too few emotional scenes, huh. If there were no OOC, I would actually like to read "A few things about YKW and his scouts in 818". Um. Just think about it, it's full of Shura atmosphere! Alas, but none of them had a bite in the book. Alas, and if it wasn't OOC, every line should be a sad www war background. Who can be sweet? . . As for Rebekah, I think the emotional line of love has not been developed yet (so the author writes more, huh.). There is only the main part of the plot, which is good and bad... I didn't expect it to be a Chinese version of the movie. At first I thought it was going to end when I saw the end of it, which scared me to death. But I have a question, why did Isaac see Zhang's head turn into the head of a peace bird? Is there anything special about Zhang? Well, the above are all illogical and random thoughts. Anyway, thank the author for bringing this article.

I'm thinking, so national consciousness personifications will also hurt each other and lead to disintegration. The method is temporarily unknown. Is it related to subjective consciousness/land? Whether it is bidirectional is currently unknown. But consciousness will perish, not the will that is immortal. At the same time, not only the country is personified, WAR/ideology will also emerge (?)