Harry Potter [GGAD/GGSS]: Harry Potter and the Serpent That Swallows Its Tail

Before the festival, I told the author that I wanted to write a long review, but it took me a few days hhhh At the beginning, after seeing Grindelwald, Godric and Salazar all appear one after another and enter the main line of the story, I was really surprised. I never imagined that so many big guys (including Dumbledore) could be brought together to stir up trouble. This is really a very interesting setting. Each boss has hundreds of years (thousands of years) of life experience, experience, and magical power. Merlin can't predict what kind of chemical reaction will occur when these thousand-year-old fairies are put together. The plot arrangement in the first half is very neat, and the story development and plot progress are very well-paced. However, starting from the middle and late chapters (the extra chapter of "The Wind and Grass"), the writing gradually became difficult, until it suddenly felt a bit broken when it was about to enter the climax of the plot. It can be seen that when writing this story, the author had too many political ideas and positions that he was eager to elaborate on, and almost all of them were poured out in the last dozen or so chapters. This results in the content of the last dozen chapters almost becoming an essay about the author's views and stance, rather than a story. The remaining plot of the story is very difficult to wrap up in the middle of a large exposition. I very much understand the author's desire to express his own opinions, and also very understand the difficulty of not being able to control it when writing a long fan novel for the first time (seeing that the author himself said that this is his first fan novel, I don't know if he has created other works before). Of course, this may also be because I am not used to this kind of montage technique. In addition, switching narrative perspectives caused me to feel confused from time to time in the later stages. Sometimes I only understood it after reading half a chapter, and I had to go back to the beginning and read it again. (As a matter of fact, if the author feels something is wrong, you can ignore this part) I actually want to have an in-depth discussion with the author about the idea of integrating the Muggle world and the wizarding world. This is also an issue I have thought about for a long time without coming to a conclusion, but the author showed me a possibility in the article. This possibility does not have a fairy-tale ideal ending, but it is closer to the real world, which makes me think that this idea may not be just a fantasy. Although there are still flaws at the end of the story, the conception of the entire story and the expansion of the world view of the original work are still very, very exciting, and the flaws cannot be concealed. During the reading process, there were many times when I marveled at the author's whimsical ideas ("Ah, it can be set like this!" "My God, it magically matches the original work here"). Although I said before that the author actually collapsed a little in the last part due to his writing power, in the entire first half, the author's writing power often made me feel that it was terrifyingly strong. One thing about writing that is very, very difficult is that you have to be smarter than the characters you write about. In order to prevent these thousand-year-old goblins + political veterans from appearing to be intellectually imbecile in the story, how much effort the author needs to spend on planning and layout is beyond the scope of my imagination. In the first half of the plot, there were many times when I thought that the author's political views are very mature, and many of his thinking dimensions about politics and systems are above those of ordinary people. I even secretly speculated whether the author majored in politics or international relations or other related majors? The shaping of the human characters of the big bosses in the story is far beyond my expectations. There are many subtle emotions and relationships, such as the tug-of-war and love between Godric and Salazar, which I didn't fully understand even after reading it for the first time. The differences between Grindelwald and Dumbledore regarding the Statute of Secrecy and their thoughts on Muggle attitudes are very, very brilliantly dissected. The author even pays attention to the changes in the two people's thoughts and concepts after a span of fifty years. This makes the images of the two great characters particularly full and three-dimensional, making me feel that as a spectator, I am reviewing a living life. Regarding the issue of time loop in "Ouroboros", I really didn't understand this. The paradox about time is too complex and complicated. I admire the author's courage to take the cycle across time as the main thread of the whole story, and his courage to try to explain it clearly, but I may need to read it a second time to understand it... (I'm still reading) Finally, of course, in addition to the wonderful story itself, the author's writing style is also amazing. The author's writing style itself is very suitable for writing this kind of grand romantic epic story. Coupled with his magnificent and vast imagination, he can always use many wonderful metaphors to depict vivid magical details, and the occasional British humor is also amazing. The whole story feels very close to the original work, and it also greatly expands the entire magical worldview based on the original work. The author allows us to see more possibilities of the Magic World on the river of time.

Is it equivalent to the history of pan-humanity with all Lostbelts cut out but fixed? We are so lucky to have fan authors like you in the HP circle. The idea of ​​using double deception to change time is amazing. Not only is it logical, but the writing method of montage also adds charm. Reading the last few chapters feels like watching "Arrival". But my favorite part is the discussion of reform, how radicals and moderates develop, compromise, and act under the existing system, and how to choose when radicals can indeed destroy the current system. The breadth and depth of the discussion as a fan work is really outstanding. When I reached the end, I felt like I had watched a century go by. Thank you for your work.

A particularly stunning book! It is full of strong rational thinking and philosophy, and sometimes you even doubt that you are reading a paper, but both the logic and the story line are closed in the end... This may be the most suitable future among countless possibilities. Destiny, what a clever thing, countless writers have described it. When you want to get rid of fate, you are going on the route arranged by fate. In the closed-loop timeline, ss is also as arranged by fate. It's a pity that ss seems to be looping forever, and the story between him and gg will not be more and cannot be extended. (Although everyone's story has an end except SS) But I always feel that SS's cycle is uncomfortable, and I hope that he can also have an end, although the individual's end does have it. From the perspective of the cyclic timeline, it is constantly reborn and dies, but it is new every time to him as an individual at that time. This seems good, after all, he does not know that he has gone through this experience countless times.

My only comfort is that I saw that Salazar had his own consciousness at the same time as his relatives were kidnapped. Can it be considered that the other part of his soul fell asleep after his body woke up and was never tortured awake?

The ggad in this article is really one of the few that I have read that is not OOC and capable of he, especially the portrayal of King Ge. The wisdom and ambition in his soul have never been shrouded in the darkness of Nurmengard. The dialogue between the greatest black and white wizards, which is full of love and opposition, is full of tension. The cause and effect of Nagini planted in him finally returns to Gellert himself. The first book of the original book mentioned that when Albus faced Harry's question in front of the Mirror of Erised, he answered that he had a pair of wool socks in his hand. However, this article actually recycled the foreshadowing of the original work as a fan. This is one of the things that struck me the most. As time is limited, I can only tell you what I think is the most amazing part first. I will write a long review when I get back from the National Day holiday.

For them, maybe death can finally reunite them again, which is sweeter than death and eternal life (I'm not sick, right). They will meet eventually Um, let's give your dear snake some socialization training this time. Gg

Before the festival, I told the author that I wanted to write a long review, but it took a few days to finish it hahhh At the beginning, after seeing Grindelwald, Godric and Salazar all appear one after another and enter the main line of the story, I was really surprised. I never imagined that so many big guys (including Dumbledore) could be brought together to stir up trouble. This is really a very interesting setting. Each boss has hundreds of years (thousands of years) of life experience, experience, and magical power. Merlin can't predict what kind of chemical reaction will occur when these thousand-year-old fairies are put together. The plot arrangement in the first half is very neat, and the story development and plot progress are very well-paced. However, starting from the middle and late chapters (the extra chapter of "The Wind and Grass"), the writing gradually became difficult, until it suddenly felt a bit broken when it was about to enter the climax of the plot. It can be seen that when writing this story, the author had too many political ideas and positions that he was eager to elaborate on, and almost all of them were poured out in the last dozen or so chapters. This results in the content of the last dozen chapters almost becoming an essay about the author's views and stance, rather than a story. The remaining plot of the story is very difficult to wrap up in the middle of a large exposition. I very much understand the author's desire to express his own opinions, and also very understand the difficulty of not being able to control it when writing a long fan novel for the first time (seeing that the author himself said that this is his first fan novel, I don't know if he has created other works before). Of course, this may also be because I am not used to this kind of montage technique. In addition, switching narrative perspectives caused me to feel confused from time to time in the later stages. Sometimes I only understood it after reading half a chapter, and I had to go back to the beginning and read it again. (As a matter of fact, if the author feels something is wrong, you can ignore this part) I actually want to have an in-depth discussion with the author about the idea of integrating the Muggle world and the wizarding world. This is also an issue I have thought about for a long time without coming to a conclusion, but the author showed me a possibility in the article. This possibility does not have a fairy-tale ideal ending, but it is closer to the real world, which makes me think that this idea may not be just a fantasy. Although there are still flaws at the end of the story, the conception of the entire story and the expansion of the world view of the original work are still very, very exciting, and the flaws cannot be concealed. During the reading process, there were many times when I marveled at the author's whimsical ideas ("Ah, it can be set like this!" "My God, it magically matches the original work here"). Although I said before that the author actually collapsed a little in the last part due to his writing power, in the entire first half, the author's writing power often made me feel that it was terrifyingly strong. One thing about writing that is very, very difficult is that you have to be smarter than the characters you write about. In order to prevent these thousand-year-old goblins + political veterans from appearing to be intellectually imbecile in the story, how much effort the author needs to spend on planning and layout is beyond the scope of my imagination. In the first half of the plot, there were many times when I thought that the author's political views are very mature, and many of his thinking dimensions about politics and systems are above those of ordinary people. I even secretly speculated whether the author majored in politics or international relations or other related majors? The shaping of the human characters of the big bosses in the story is far beyond my expectations. There are many subtle emotions and relationships, such as the tug-of-war and love between Godric and Salazar, which I didn't fully understand even after reading it for the first time. The differences between Grindelwald and Dumbledore regarding the Statute of Secrecy and their thoughts on Muggle attitudes are very, very brilliantly dissected. The author even pays attention to the changes in the two people's thoughts and concepts after a span of fifty years. This makes the images of the two great characters particularly full and three-dimensional, making me feel that as a spectator, I am reviewing a living life. Regarding the issue of time loop in "Ouroboros", I really didn't understand this. The paradox about time is too complex and complicated. I admire the author's courage to take the cycle across time as the main thread of the whole story, and his courage to try to explain it clearly, but I may need to read it a second time to understand it... (I'm still reading) Finally, of course, in addition to the wonderful story itself, the author's writing style is also amazing. The author's writing style itself is very suitable for writing this kind of grand romantic epic story. Coupled with his magnificent and vast imagination, he can always use many wonderful metaphors to depict vivid magical details, and the occasional British humor is also amazing. The whole story feels very close to the original work, and it also greatly expands the entire magical worldview based on the original work. The author allows us to see more possibilities of the Magic World on the river of time.

Everything flows towards the right river, and perfection and regret coexist. Fall in love with your lover's withered body, and rush to your lover's ideals. Leaving in the eyes of the lover, meeting again in the ignorance of the lover---the fate of Salazar and Godric is a chain of broken threads; all fate is a chain of causal influence. ? The focus is not on whether the iron law of fate has changed, but on the road to resistance. ? Love transcends life and death, which is why they meet each other several times on the road of reincarnation. ? Love is a tragedy, a single-handed cause of death. ? Love is salvation, the last tenderness in the vast time ? This is a ring, the beginning is not the beginning, and the end is not the ending. I first saw it on an old Ford, and it still hasn't come out in more than a year. They were supposed to have a happy ending, and then they parted and reunited again, but they were never happy [crying]

The description of the paradox of fate in the article reminds me of a hypothesis I have read recently: in two dimensions, objects only have two sides: the front and the back. To go from the front to the back, you must cross a "border". Two-dimensional ants living on the front cannot reach the back. In the three-dimensional world, there is a Möbius strip structure, and the front also leads to the back. The two are one surface, and the two-dimensional ants can crawl on it smoothly. So if the world is four-dimensional, the grandmother's paradox is not a paradox. The grandmother's life and death are just two seemingly opposite sides of a Möbius strip, but they are connected to each other and exist at the same time. That is: if the protagonist goes back in time and kills his grandmother - the protagonist cannot be born - then he cannot go back in time to kill his grandmother (skip this paradox point) - then the grandmother survives and the protagonist survives - the protagonist goes back in time to kill his grandmother... Killing the grandmother and not killing the grandmother, the protagonist's birth and not being born are like the positive and negative points on the Möbius strip. They are completely opposite and cannot be reached in the two-dimensional world, but they can be connected in the three-dimensional world. In the two-dimensional view of the infinite image of the Möbius strip, the two lines must intersect, but this is not the case in three dimensions. So in the four-dimensional world, grandmother's death and non-death are not completely opposite "paradoxes". In this way of thinking, destiny is not a river or a tree branch, but a... Klein bottle?

How can I see this in 24 years... It's amazing