The Scholar's Seduction

In fact, the reason for this long review is that I saw a very high review page. I originally wanted to reply in the building, but I typed too many words without realizing it, so I posted a long comment separately. Of course, this comment may be a bit late, after all, it seems that the discussion in the building took place a few years ago. Maybe it triggered a little desire for expression, so let's say something. Let's first talk about the points mentioned about the author's incorrect use of writing style. 1. When you want to write an essay, some people may have colloquial expressions, but not all of them are like correcting mistakes in sentences for the college entrance examination. Therefore, if there are repeated meanings like "du" and "", it can only be said that it is not refined enough, and it is far from being considered as poor writing. Otherwise, how should we view Mr. Lu Xun's "Two Trees"? 2. The usage of "working hard to govern" and "loving the people like children". "Love the people like a son" can be used to describe officials and people in power, so it is not wrong to use it to describe Master Qingtian. The old meaning of "working hard to govern" and history books indeed only describe the emperor, so its use here is open to question. However, Mr. Liang Qichao once wrote, "We must work hard to govern for the progress of the country." The meaning of this word has been extended, so now there are many misuses of it for ordinary people's careers. So these two words, I feel, can remind the author or discuss, but probably not to the extent that we can arbitrarily determine that there is a problem with the other party's writing. Originally, the Chinese character forms, meanings, and word usages are in a constant process of change. When people today bring the current usage into the past, it is inevitable that there will be some inappropriateness or inconsistency. And some of these changes often begin with misuse. Including the evolution of Tongjia characters, and even some words have new meanings, etc. Just like in the reply, the use of "rare and strange" seems to be debatable. After all, the main meaning of this word is "people with little knowledge will feel very strange when encountering uncommon things.", And it may be used to refer to "people who have read less literature, so they cannot distinguish between good and bad or have never seen truly good literature." Maybe it should be considered. 3. Everyone may have different judgments about whether the writing strength is normal or deep. Even world-famous authors such as Mo Yan and Liu Cixin are criticized for their plain language and the core of their stories. Therefore, writing style and writing style are sometimes difficult to agree upon. To take a step back, as long as it can support the core of the story, the writing is enough. In addition, I would like to say a few words about the hostility issue in the author's reply. The author has some rather irritating replies in other comments. Since I haven't seen them, I won't comment on them. But to be fair, this is probably a normal reaction in this building, but it's not a good temper. People who read the article evaluate it from the heart, which is of course justified. It is also a compulsory course for authors to post articles on public platforms to be able to maintain a calm mind and face various different opinions. But when we use a very derogatory tone to evaluate others, we must also accept a series of reactions that the other person may have because they are offended. After all, decency is mutual, and literature makes friends. Neither the author nor the reader is the leader. Expose more opinions, but don't think that your conclusion must be the most correct. Just like when you go to a restaurant to eat and you think it doesn't taste good, it's normal to say "I don't like it" or "It doesn't taste good"; it's normal not to come back in the future, or even tell your friends never to come again; but if you have to say to the boss, "Your cooking skills are really bad", it's a bit offensive.

Great looking!! Looking forward to the next one!!!

It's a very heartwarming story, very touching. I originally wanted to rate it, but I locked one chapter and couldn't.

No. . . It didn't say why Mr. He doesn't like the male protagonist to put on his little shoes. The rest seems to have been almost explained.

It's a very interesting article, but I don't know why it has so few clicks.

Finished reading. Come on (? ??_??)?

Why is there no ending for Huang Yuan, the scumbag? Didn't Huang Fan want to take revenge on his scumbag father? The author didn't explain it clearly.

It's very well written and has a very warm feeling. I hope to add more extras.

I stayed up late to finish reading your novel. I liked it very much.

I have been following this book since it was first written by the author, but later I felt it was not that good, so I stopped reading it. I started reading it again today. The author wrote it well at first, but then it lost a little bit of that feeling. But today I read the back part and felt that it is really a good book. Keep up the good work, keep up the good work, keep up the good work⊙?⊙!