I Deduce That the Heroine Likes Me [Book Transmigration]

Replacement ticket + review. I have watched it three or four times. I took it out to read when I was short of literature. I hope that there is really no article that can be read in the literature of the current channel gold list.

I finished reading it, and then began to write my first review since I started reading the novel. It is not so much a review as it is some fragmented thoughts and feelings. First of all, I must yell: Madam, you are a philosophy major! Because I think this kind of article cannot be written well without a certain philosophical foundation. What kind of discussion topics are covered throughout the article? There are the relationship between morality and law in ethics, fundamental issues in philosophy, discussions of existence and thinking, and confusion, self-identity and self-denial in Dazai Osamu's literature (it is not difficult to find traces of "Disqualification in the World" through the shaping of Wen Zhe. In connection with the book "Run, Melos!", Let's make a bold guess, Wen Zhe entered Song Binghai as The Utopia created by Juliet has changed since then, that is, he has found the reality and existence that he thinks). There seem to be some logical problems (but I am not very good at "Logic", so I won't say more). It may also involve some political philosophy (Plato's "Utopia"). I don't know if I am right. Then, I want to yell a second time: Madam, are you writing a philosophical novel? Some people say that a story is a world. This must be true for all creators. Madam, you are a werewolf, which directly "concretely" embodies this concept. My statement is not accurate. How can I put it? I think what makes this book awesome is that the illusion and reality in the story (Song Muxue's world) are constantly switching, and the fiction and reality in the story are constantly intertwined with the world outside the story (Kou Shuang's world). Unlike other novels in the book-traveling genre, Kou Shuang has never had a sense of belonging to Song Muxue's world. This is false. Kou Shuang's sense of belonging to Song Muxue is real. However, before Song Muxue left her own world, Kou Shuang's reality did not exist. From a philosophical point of view, can this be considered a contradiction between existence and thinking? Then there is the contradiction between Song Muxue. In the setting of "Snow Give Me", Song Muxue is a pure "just partner" (can I contact the father and son Wei Gong). However, due to Kou Shuang's intervention, Song Muxue became less pure, but did not completely deviate from the established track. Sun Jiawen told her the truth, which made Song Muxue fall into self-doubt and self-denial. For a person, the collapse of the worldview is like the denial of existence. Song Muxue has always thought that she is "materialistic", which is reality for her, but for Kou Shuang, she has always been "idealistic". As long as Kou Shuang does not take Song Muxue away from her reality for a day, Song Muxue is the product of the original author's thinking. When Song Muxue discovers herself or changes her thinking and finds that she is "idealistic", she achieves the "unity of thinking and existence" that Kou Shuang wants. Thirdly, I would also like to say: Thank you, my wife, for giving me some thoughts and ideas! I think Madam's plot setting about the contradiction and unity between law and morality is really great! There is a sentence in the article that impressed me deeply, "Everyone has their own justice." Because everyone's world view and values are different, they have different ways of achieving justice. For Xiaodie, asking the man in black to SHA SI his father for himself who suffered injustice in the past is justice; for Song Muxue, it is justice to punish criminals through legal procedures; for the screenwriter, choosing to bear the so-called twenty-six lives is his justice; for the man in black, SHA through violent means. SI Anyone who does not meet his moral standards is righteous. So what is the relationship between morality and law? In fact, this issue is still highly controversial. I personally have two thoughts. One is that morality is the root of law, and law is the specific form of morality that has reached a general consensus in society. The other is that law is born out of morality and is also independent of morality. I will not go into details here. Finally, I wish my wife to write better and better articles as she writes. PS: In fact, I still have some random ideas, but I'm afraid I can't control them, so I turned into writing a small essay in the author's comments [laughing and crying]

I read this article when I was a student N years ago, hahaha. I forgot my account and had to buy it again. As expected, interesting things are still interesting. There are only a few articles that have always left an impression on Jinjiang, and this is one of them. It's a very interesting article for me and I will read it again in the future (?

In fact, I read this book at the beginning with the attitude of casually flipping through it to pass the time. I rarely, or it can be said that I have never seen such a large-scale speculative description in Lily's works (maybe it is because I have not read many online literature works). I did not expect to see it in Lily novels. It is an unexpected surprise to see discussions on highly speculative works such as Brain in a Vat, Black Mirror, Westworld, The Matrix, and The Truman Show, as well as the world setting of Sophie in Inception, in the fast-food literature that is nothing more than you love me, I love you. Although I was in a state of ostrich-style philosophical suicide during this period (otherwise I wouldn't have come to Jinjiang to read erotic stories, smile bitterly), using this book as an introduction gave me a certain desire to dig through the sand and regain my brain. This is my humble opinion, but I am sorry if I offend you. [Role aspect] In terms of characterization, both protagonists are subpar in my opinion. Song Muxue has already set the tone for her at the beginning: absolute justice, cold-faced and kind-hearted. Taking film and television works as an example, subtitles annotating the character's identity at the beginning are a very crude way of expression. Good works will use pictures, lines, and actions to reflect the character's identity and even the world background. Detailed descriptions bring readers a realistic experience, just like the results of personal calculations, which are always more profound than glancing at the standard answers. The use of annotations to represent the characters is already at a disadvantage at the beginning of the chapter. Although the author has been trying to transform or reshape Song Muxue's image as a "person" with independent consciousness throughout the entire article, it is a pity that the integration is not strong. The huge sense of fragmentation leads to a sense of unreality and a very thin and boring character. (As an aside, the black version of Song Muxue even made me feel the shadow of Yandere Gen.) As for Kou Shuang, the transition before and after the collapse of the small world was even more blunt. Before that, she had adopted a detached and indifferent outsider mentality towards the world in the book; after the collapse of the small world, she suddenly fell in love with Song Muxue to death. Hong Kong Zhen was incomprehensible. During this period of time, the emotional changes were described in a long way. In addition to blocking the knife, the only thing she could do was to make trouble in the hospital. Although Song Muxue's emotions are restrained, the author has also tried to work hard in this area. Small details such as asking "Are you willing to study in the United States?" Are worthy of praise. Unfortunately, this kind of foreshadowing is still too little. In my humble opinion, this level of emotional change is completely insufficient to support the intensity of Kou Shuang's feelings for Song Muxue later, and vice versa for Song against Kou. It can only be said that it is forcing love and concern for the development of the plot. Maybe it has something to do with my personal preference. There must be a long trickle before the flood breaks the embankment. It seems ridiculous to me that the embankment collapses without water. It is the best character in this book, and the crazy characters are probably more attractive. Like a fighter who never surrenders, what she has to deal with cannot be conquered once and for all. The enemy is invincible, so why not fight? How can you say you are free if you have never fought for freedom? Don't go gentle into that good night. What she did and could do was to keep fighting, one round after another, rest for a while, and then fight endlessly until she could no longer handle any more rounds. There are many similarities with McMurphy in "One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest": they both exist in a world controlled by ruthless machines; they are both defined as "crazy" by mainstream society that does not like their way of thinking; they both carry the madness of wanting to die if they are not free, and in the end they both underwent "frontal lobotomy" surgery. [The feelings between the protagonists --- triggering the discussion of "love"] The failure in portraying the protagonist led to the result that the emotions between the two people had no depth. An intuitive feeling brought about by this discordant emotion is that people naturally think that Kou Shuang only loves the perfect Song Muxue written in the book (although the author has added some additions in the text, but it is not very effective), the image of a lover she constructed and nurtured in her heart, and then unilaterally announced that she saw love. We often say, I like you, I love you, but we have not thought about what "you" itself is (this concept can even be extended to "I" and "love", but that would be further and further away). Is it a name? A face? A body? A memory? Some people may object that what I love is the soul. Although it is not appropriate, I still want to introduce Kant's concept of "things in themselves and representations" here, that is, we can never know for sure the "original" appearance of things. What we understand is only the things we "see" in our eyes. We cannot touch the soul (thing-in-itself), we can only simulate the soul through a series of behaviors or pictures (appearances). Self-awareness affects the way we simulate, just like when you pour water into a kettle, the water immediately conforms to the shape of the kettle. In the same way, our sensory perception will also conform to our self-awareness. Rather than saying "love you", it is better to say "love your soul that I simulated". In layman's terms, there are a thousand Hamlets in the eyes of a thousand people. What you love is the Hamlet in your eyes, not the Hamlet in the eyes of others. Maybe what people need is not the truth, but an object that fits their imagination. [Nested world - triggering discussion of "reality"] Every time this kind of nested world setting similar to cyberspace appears, there is always a conflict between matter and spirit. Should you choose Descartes' "I think, therefore I am" and firmly believe that you are a unique individual; or should you choose Feuerbach's "thinking comes from existence" and then deny yourself until you die? Most of these works choose the former orientation, and they all have a core theme - escape, such as Different Dimension Hackers, West World, etc. This work is no exception. Whether it is Sun Jiawen's indomitable spirit or the slight entanglement of the two protagonists later, they all express a strong free will: "I exist, and I want to live in the real world." However, who can guarantee that the next world will be real? This is a bit like an endless Möbius strip, and a bit like Sisyphus, the absurd hero who always resists meaninglessness. Even though they clearly and painfully realize that the world is meaningless, these characters still resist tirelessly. Probably when the known reality collapses, people can only embrace the unknown world. There is a line in "Macbeth", "Life is a tale told by fools, noisy and empty." Are those of us who claim to live in reality necessarily true? Are we a story told by a fool? Where can we escape to? There is an outlier in cyberspace that I have to mention, and that is San Junipero from Black Mirror S03. The two heroines uncharacteristically chose to return to the virtual world, but most viewers thought this was a choice worthy of blessing. Correspondingly, there is a rather idealistic statement in "1984": "If he thinks he has levitated off the ground, and if I think I see him levitating off the ground at the same time, then it has really happened. ... What knowledge do we have of anything except through our own minds? Everything happens in our minds. Whatever happens in the mind, really happens." Perhaps we can say that choosing to live after recognizing the absurd truth is a meaningful thing, because it requires a lot of strength, or a lot of love, to believe that life is better than death. As for whether it is truly alive, why should we care? [Gemini Project - triggering discussion of "self"] Judging from the artificially shaped values ​​of Juliet and Song Muxue, another very interesting issue can arise - why am I who I am. This work completely abandons the "innate concepts" of Descartes' rationalism, using the inappropriate popular term, genetic determinism, and instead embraces empiricism, Locke's "blank slate theory", which believes that human beings are born with a blank slate and have no innate concepts. The so-called innate concepts are formed when acquired experiences are reflected in the human mind. Since the idea of ​​"innate ideas" does not exist in this article, let us put it aside for the time being and talk about these so-called experiences that create us. After a child is born, various experiences inherited from the past have been attached to him: family, nation, country, culture... This is a kind of similar feeling that a group of people have among each other because of the characteristics of language, history and culture. Human beings have had consciousness since the dawn of history. Before he could "think," he had been told the origin story of where he came from, the "truth" of the world, the "history" of his ancestors, and the "legends" that gave it all meaning. This innate imprint is an indelible trait that covers the first layer of the whiteboard. When everyone first looks at something, they are wearing the glasses of the native language of the ethnic group and using different grammar, which will indeed lead to different observations and different evaluations. This not only defines what a person absorbs and experiences, but also shapes who he is and will be in the future. Western humanism and Eastern egoism, leading to the different attitudes toward sex today, are a good example. From birth to death, human beings are surrounded by fictional stories and concepts that make them think a certain way, act by certain standards, want certain things, and abide by certain norms. This is how millions of strangers can cooperate seamlessly, following this artificial rather than innate intuition. This artificial intuition is similar to the "experience" I want to talk about. To use a literary point of view, such as Borges, "I think we should be grateful to the entire past, to human history, to all books, to all memories, because in the end, all we have is the past, and the past is a belief." This means, to a certain extent, that self-consciousness is a projection of the past. Perhaps human consciousness is a tragic mistake in evolution. We are enslaved by the illusion that we have a self. A combination of sensory experiences and feelings are programmed to believe that each of us is someone, when in fact, we are nobody. I am a complete nihilist, and I hope you don't take this statement seriously. [The opposition between the main and supporting characters - triggering a discussion of "law and morality"] Another point worth discussing is the opposition between the law represented by Song Muxue and the morality (or private law) represented by other supporting characters. Regarding Ji Xiaocang and Wu Wenyu, Camus's passage in "The Plague" can be used to describe it perfectly, "Evil in the world is almost always caused by ignorance. Good intentions without knowledge will cause as much damage as evil. People are always better than bad. There are many, but the actual problem is not here. But there are differences in the degree of people's ignorance. This is the so-called distinction between virtue and evil, and the most hopeless evil is ignorance: thinking that you know everything, so you think you have the right to kill." Most people believe that law is the lowest limit of morality. However, law is essentially a kind of class will (a very intuitive example is family planning) and has little to do with morality, which is similar to a social contract. The social order of Homo sapiens is constructed through imagination, and law is the coercive means to maintain this imaginary order. Law does not exist for the benefit of all mankind. The reason is that there is no objective measurement standard for "interests". Different classes have different definitions of "right" and there is no objective standard to determine what is better. The law does not pursue a "good society", but morality is the opposite. I believe that morality can improve the efficiency of cooperation and create a better society. This can actually be regarded as a variant of the social contract. However, Nietzsche said in "The Twilight of the Idols" that "moral judgment is similar to religious judgment, in that they both believe in facts that do not exist at all. Morality is just an explanation of a specific phenomenon, and to be precise, it is a misunderstanding." From this point of view, morality is like a collective illusion produced by human beings in order to stay in a corner and comfort themselves. Maybe there is no such thing as wrong or right, good or bad, righteous or evil. Those are just the perceptions that people have when they look back. Finally My mind wandered for a while, I'm sorry, let's get back to this novel. In general, the world structure, character relationship network, and plot planning are all relatively solid, and the logic is not too flawed (however, the setting of Juliet's Philosopher King is a bit biased. The best city-state in the Utopia needs not only the Philosopher King, but more importantly, the justice of gold, silver, and copper to perform their respective duties). If you put some effort into the characterization and carefully carve it out, it will be a good work. Good works require time to be refined. I personally do not support the model of online articles that rushes updates and rushes to be published. (I'll complain again, the interactive interface for writing comments on the Jinjiang app is so bad that I don't know where to start.)

When I read this novel again, I was surprised that so much time has passed! Been through a lot over the years! When I first read the novel, I was still a student who had not graduated, and I was still confused about the structure of the world. Because of this, I have doubted this world, and I have also imagined jumping out of reality, or having another person appear from another reality to save my broken self! After experiencing and growing up in reality, I have become a different person! Looking back at this novel, maybe Sun Jiawen was the script I got! Question, break through, bravely venture into the world, save yourself from the suffering and desolation of reality, no longer force others to understand, just be yourself, and the world will become wider instantly. Maybe in the future, when I open this book again, I may have another surprise and insight, haha, who knows!

Love it! One link after another! Throw flowers!

This article is Bai Yueguang in my heart, I like it very much

It's so interesting, so sweet. Song Zang may have always been a road freak, but he just had the road in his heart hahaha

Finished reading! The author writes very well!

Reading this novel again, I suddenly felt that pursuing freedom does not necessarily require coming to this so-called real world. After Song Muxue left, the world shattered, which was quite cruel. Supporting characters like Fang Laowu, Wu Hongye, etc. Were all gone. All the people and things in the world in the book were gone. The small world built by the readers and the author's mind collapsed before it officially grew. In fact, our world will also collapse with the expansion of the sun in billions of years. Our earth is also using external energy. Now that time travel novels are so popular, I suddenly have a new idea. The author and readers endow the small world with telepathy, which is its source of energy. This energy will disconnect the two worlds after the novel is completed. The small world will develop as a new parallel world and then be depleted of energy and destroyed. Of course, the better situation is that the small world gradually grows and improves itself, and can generate its own energy to maintain its own survival. The novel Whether it is completed or not depends on how strong the reader's imagination is and how good the author's writing is, which corresponds to how much energy the new small world can obtain, which determines the length of their existence. The protagonist can play a role in maintaining the world during the development of the plot. After the plot is over, the world should continue to run according to the logic and rules given by the plot until the energy is exhausted. Tiandao is Song Muxue's subconscious mind. You can change your thinking. After the plot ends, let Tiandao consciousness and Song Muxue's consciousness be separated, and let Tiandao consciousness become more perfect to maintain the operation of the world. Song Muxue accompanies Shuangshuang to the real world, so that everyone can be well. People in the small world can live freely without knowing anything.