Confessions of a Cat Servant

Recently, I suddenly remembered this article. I had no choice but to forget the title of the book. After thinking about it for a few days, I suddenly remembered the author's name. I touched it and read the ending. I was fed a good knife? I love the characters of the Lieutenant Colonel and Bit, so why did the Lieutenant Colonel sacrifice? When I first read it, I thought it would be better to separate the Bit line and create a separate world. How sweet that would be. Also, although I can't accept the NPC, I would rather the three of them be together than the ending where the Lieutenant Colonel sacrifices himself?

No one complained about this article? Everyone is so kind. I've always liked this story, it's so cute and adorable. However, if you are a novice, you must have the self-consciousness of a novice! If it weren't for Su, would you, an ordinary person, be able to raise a humanoid military dog, or would you be an all-round licking dog? The whole background setting basically serves Su, but in the end you wrote the lover to death? You are strong, you read this article just to prostitute a military dog, but he died, just like the male protagonist of a love mobile game died, and the protagonist of Long Aotian's script died. Isn't it funny? Don't talk about deep sadness, it's all a joke given your background setting. If you have a grand background, involving bloody struggle, fighting against fate, etc., Then the role of the sword is to lyrically sublimate the theme. If you give me the role of the sword, which is so white, then you are irresponsible for the role. Does your article have a theme? Do you have feelings to express? Do you read the psychological description of your character for fun? You succeeded in disgusting me. There is no foreshadowing at all, and suddenly Paragon has an enemy, suddenly the protagonist is kidnapped, and suddenly Paragon dies. Are you writing a plot or just teasing me? After reading this article, this feeling of depression has been stuck in my chest. After all, I really loved this article, but I just saw a great author say, "If it is not suitable for a knife, never knife, and you cannot knife for the sake of the knife. If a main character cannot die with value, appropriateness, and impact, then it is better to live. Trauma for the sake of trauma is not gentle enough." I immediately thought of your article, which is a benchmark of "Knife for the sake of knife". Are you more than "not gentle enough"? The plot has no logic. My first reaction after watching it was not sadness, but "What the hell". Even though Avengers 3 is logical, a lot of people are criticizing it. What do you think your article is? Of course it cannot be compared with Avengers. I just hope that after watching Avengers, you can understand this feeling. After all, I liked you, and I hope you can really like the child you created. Even if it is a novel, the characters are loveable. You are so ruthless towards the characters you write, and "The Heartthrob" can be regarded as an excellent cool novel (it is said to be a cool novel because all the characters have super flat images, which are basically read by Su). Because the protagonist is not in love, this ruthlessness can be regarded as an advantage. But you can't be so cruel all the time, right? What supports your writing? Is it because you want to abuse the character? It can be seen from your new article that you want to write a good article, but the pace is slow and seems to be a drag (even if I am a subversive person in the college entrance examination, I think so), and the character is still flat. Loving him basically means loving the character. In the final analysis, I am afraid that you don't love the article you wrote. You just "want to write a good article to challenge yourself." You don't care what the article is about, you just want to write "good". The above is my wild guess, and this is the feeling the author conveyed to me. Suggestion: If you don't want to waste your brain, just keep writing. The protagonist has no emotions and is a heartthrob, and the audience will be wide. If you want to really write a good article, carefully feel the emotions and thoughts of the characters, and don't write it over and over again and it will still be a blank article, then why are you bothering? Finally, it is normal for readers of Jinjiang to criticize the author, and Jinjiang is only for girls, and the people are kind. Think carefully when reading book reviews and be sensible. If no one complains, I won't have any burden.

After all, it's JJ's fault. If it were flowers, there wouldn't be so many rules.

I like Bit, Lieutenant Colonel... That's it. I only like loyal and cute puppies. I can only say that if they are inappropriate, they are inappropriate. Being naughty and cowardly cannot gain true love.

The protagonist said that the death of a supporting character was sad but acceptable (.

I have to say that I really have a good sword. I have been in the sweet literature world for so many years, but you are the first to write Shou to death. What a big sword!

The dog world of Zhenxun, military dogs and Pitbull are my memories to this day. . It's really well described, but I haven't seen any other articles with this kind of world view yet.

Speechless, the ending is like shit, it's better to cheat than to feed shit. At that time, I was thinking about how to deal with this triangle relationship, because it was so inconsistent. I never thought that if one of them died, the other two could be together? It's true that you feed the knife and the knife is right. Although I also like Bit, I have to say that this ending is like stabbing everyone several times. The characters are all incomplete and incomplete. When I think of the characters in it spending the rest of their lives incomplete, I feel that the author has no love for the characters in it, let alone enemies. Author, you are just enjoying destroying the characters.

No one complained about this article? Everyone is so kind. I've always liked this story, it's so cute and adorable. However, if you are a novice, you must have the self-consciousness of a novice! If it weren't for Su, would you, an ordinary person, be able to raise a humanoid military dog, or would you be an all-round licking dog? The whole background setting basically serves Su, but in the end you wrote the lover to death? You are strong, you read this article just to prostitute a military dog, but he died, just like the male protagonist of a love mobile game died, and the protagonist of Long Aotian's script died. Isn't it funny? Don't talk about deep sadness, it's all a joke given your background setting. If you have a grand background, involving bloody struggle, fighting against fate, etc., Then the role of the sword is to lyrically sublimate the theme. If you give me the role of the sword, which is so white, then you are irresponsible for the role. Does your article have a theme? Do you have feelings to express? Do you read the psychological description of your character for fun? You succeeded in disgusting me. There is no foreshadowing at all, and suddenly Paragon has an enemy, suddenly the protagonist is kidnapped, and suddenly Paragon dies. Are you writing a plot or just teasing me? After reading this article, this feeling of depression has been stuck in my chest. After all, I really loved this article, but I just saw a great author say, "If it is not suitable for a knife, never knife, and you cannot knife for the sake of the knife. If a main character cannot die with value, appropriateness, and impact, then it is better to live. Trauma for the sake of trauma is not gentle enough." I immediately thought of your article, which is a benchmark of "Knife for the sake of knife". Are you more than "not gentle enough"? The plot has no logic. My first reaction after watching it was not sadness, but "What the hell". Even though Avengers 3 is logical, a lot of people are criticizing it. What do you think your article is? Of course it cannot be compared with Avengers. I just hope that after watching Avengers, you can understand this feeling. After all, I liked you, and I hope you can really like the child you created. Even if it is a novel, the characters are loveable. You are so ruthless towards the characters you write, and "The Heartthrob" can be regarded as an excellent cool novel (it is said to be a cool novel because all the characters have super flat images, which are basically read by Su). Because the protagonist is not in love, this ruthlessness can be regarded as an advantage. But you can't be so cruel all the time, right? What supports your writing? Is it because you want to abuse the character? It can be seen from your new article that you want to write a good article, but the pace is slow and seems to be a drag (even if I am a subversive person in the college entrance examination, I think so), and the character is still flat. Loving him basically means loving the character. In the final analysis, I am afraid that you don't love the article you wrote. You just "want to write a good article to challenge yourself." You don't care what the article is about, you just want to write "good". The above is my wild guess, and this is the feeling the author conveyed to me. Suggestion: If you don't want to waste your brain, just keep writing. The protagonist has no emotions and is a heartthrob, and the audience will be wide. If you want to really write a good article, carefully feel the emotions and thoughts of the characters, and don't write it over and over again and it will still be a blank article, then why are you bothering? Finally, it is normal for readers of Jinjiang to criticize the author, and Jinjiang is only for girls, and the people are kind. Think carefully when reading book reviews and be sensible. If no one complains, I won't have any burden.

What is the difference between this kind of BE and a meteorite falling from the sky and killing everyone? Still don't BE for the sake of BE. Obviously the protagonists have a hundred ways to live a happy life.