In the Entertainment Industry, Love Makes You Reckless

Ah, don't get excited. In fact, the author said in the comment area that it's not that they are together, but that they are relieved. At least he no longer uses his life to retaliate against Zha Gong, but that doesn't mean he forgives, let alone being together. I say I feel sorry for my parents, but that's not true. If Shou really used his life to avenge Zha Gong, he would be sorry for his parents' efforts. My parents did so much to keep Shou alive, and even died because of it in the end. Why should they throw away this life casually and use it to take revenge on Zha Gong? Of course Shou will never be together with Gong again, because the rift will never heal. The most important thing is that I actually don't think I can live a long life... Heart disease is very fragile. I missed the best treatment period, and I also experienced the great tragedy of my lover betraying my parents and passing away. This is completely inconsistent with the basic principle of calmness required by heart patients. Even if the heart is replaced, how long can we guarantee that there will be no rejection reaction? What's more, I have a history of delaying treatment before. It would be a joke if I lived a long life. Maybe five years, maybe ten years. In short, it is hard for me to imagine that Shou will live until the age of normal people. And even if he is alive, he cannot be with Zha Gong. Because if you want to live a healthy life, you can't be happy or sad, and there is no doubt that Zha Gong is a person who can make him emotionally unstable. First of all, it is impossible for him to completely forget the betrayal and the death of his parents. If he is really together with Zha Gong, it will inevitably be a mixture of sorrow and joy, and he will undoubtedly die faster. So Shou, who has experienced the preciousness of life, will never risk his own life to be with a scumbag, unless one day he can treat Gong calmly. The question is, do you still love him when you can calm down? If you don't love each other, there is no need to be together. I don't think that not being together means BE, so it's not wrong for the author to say that the ending is he. It is completely impossible for Gong and Shou to be together. The only thing Gong wants is for Shou to survive, and Shou has also changed from being passive to realizing that living is the most important thing. This is he.

No torture?? Not happy! ! ! !

Why is it that the more I watch, the more I feel like the protagonist is seducing? ? The Holy Mother was drunk even to this point. Completely regardless of how his parents died. Try every means to be with Chu. What torture? To put it nicely, it means I don't want to hurt anyone who has nothing to do with it. At worst, it means I am being mean and want to flirt. The protagonist doesn't feel like he's sorry for his parents Never thought so. So selfish. It's also really disgusting. What revenge. Totally flirtatious. It makes me feel distressed. Holy Mother. Do you really think that even if your parents die in Chu's hands, you can forgive them generously? Why do you still sleep with Chu? Totally understand the incompetence. They are your parents. You. I really don't want to say anything. It's even more hypocritical to be mean. How disgusting.

I think this article is not like those "three wrong views" mentioned in the comments. It is because the three views are too correct that it leads to this result. I can't imagine that the flowers in a greenhouse suddenly transform into overlord flowers and kill everyone. The strength is so well controlled, that's why it's soft and artificial, and it's the character's own characteristics that you can't hold it up and put it down. But I don't accept it... Forgive me for being a bit idealistic and partial to perfection. Barriers already exist, not to mention this kind of double deception involving life and feelings. If they can live without grudges, I can only wish them to torture each other until they grow old. In addition, most of the author's articles are quite academic. Although not very formal, they are still outstanding. Q: Your boyfriend treats you like this, what do you want to say to him? Fang: What are you talking about... Of course I forgive him!

... I think this is be, they are basically torturing each other, it would be better to live forever and not have any contact with each other.

Crying like a dog, this is the difference between a good person and a bad person

Dear author, can you understand that the truth I got from this article is actually "people are bullied when they are kind". With Xiao Fang's character, it's normal for this ending to happen. But he is so nice that he doesn't know how to hurt others. Of course, the price of fake suicide is very high, but it also has the meaning of calculation anyway. And Gallo's reaction cannot be called OOC, but what if Gallo loved her more deeply? I'm afraid just one Gallo will drive Xiao Fang crazy. Although, do good deeds and don't worry about the future. However, a "good person" like Xiao Fang has no ability to protect himself. If something happens to him, it will be a tragedy. Even if they are together, I still think this is BE, Xiao Fang's tragedy.

It turns out that I have also read this article_(:з∠)_

The author worked so hard to write, so I won't give negative marks. To be honest, when I first read the book review, I really thought it was the author who was wronged. Now it seems that I just spent money to ruin my mood (=′ー`) To be honest, attacking is really rubbish and receiving is really cheap. The whole article is probably a story about a guy who was forced to commit suicide because of his unrequited love, but the guy still had to post it, and there was also a story where the guy attempted murder and made the guy almost sick, but even like this, the guy changed his mind quickly while pretending to commit suicide (? Or was he pretending to be hypocritical?)? To be honest, based on the sadistic sentence in the author's copy, I was really not in a good mood. There was not a single bit of sadistic abuse during the whole process. All in all, it felt like... Spending money to pay for the pain?

To illustrate my point: 1. The death of Shou's parents had nothing to do with Gong. After all, you could be killed by a meteorite while walking on the road, and the article has made it clear that his parents accidentally encountered a street massacre. 2. I think the method of revenge given by the author is incomprehensible: If you want to abide by the law and not harm others, why don't you sue him for murder? Since the author does not promote excessive revenge, I think the charge of attempted murder is entirely appropriate. Of course, there is no need to write such words, and I can understand that. 3. I cannot accept the ending of HE. Especially when it is mentioned in the article that Gong is not a suicidal person at all. I hate this kind of person who calculates everything from beginning to end. Stripping away all external factors, Gong is just using means to get what he wants, such as feeling relieved; but putting it in the name of love will make him look great and upright. 4. I didn't see Gong's reflection, which is inconsistent with the author's previous statement that Gong realize his mistakes. Gong only knew how he had hurt others, but he did not realize the essential nature of his behavior and reflect on it. 5. I didn't see what the author was trying to promote in the article, which may be a deviation in expression. If I hadn't seen what was said, I might not have known that the author was trying to convey these views. 6. I actually agree with the author's moral values. 7. I don't like the way the author chooses the ending based on the reader's preferences. I can understand the author's behavior of cutting down the outline based on readers' suggestions or data, but the ending can be said to be the soul of an article, but the author actually asked whether he should HE or BE? Although it seems to have not changed in the end, how can the author change the character's inherent nature at will? Well, I'm talking about OOC. 8. Forgive the person who murdered you? I think the author can make the shou make compromises with the attacker, either the shou loves the attacker in return, or the shou understands that life is precious. But where does this leave the life of suffering? Is attempted murder not murder? Just because you didn't realize the seriousness of what you did can you be forgiven? Some people may say that the attack has already paid for life. Although it is a calculation, Shou does not know it. So what happened to your final relief? Life is important now, but life in the past is not important? Does Shou not have nightmares in the middle of the night? Although Shou doesn't want to die and knows how precious life is, I really don't think Shou truly knows how precious life is. Of course, this may be because I am a little sensitive, because I have always been concerned about the lack of life education in China. 9. The expression is a bit confusing and the words do not express what I mean. Please give me some understanding. 10. I just posted my thoughts after reading it. I don't mean to discredit the author, so we won't tear it apart. I really won't tear it up.