The Beloved Concubine of a Commoner

It's really strange. Why do you say plagiarism? You can check the publication time.

I finally finished reading it, and it turned out to be a comfortable read. I can't say it's plagiarism. I've read about a quick-travel system with this setting, and you can choose the gender of your child. I hope I can still remember that book "Good Pregnancy" in a few days. This article is meant to relax the mind, but it also causes so many things and makes me sad.

Coming from the legendary plagiarized article, we can only say that there are some similarities in some settings. For example, the emperor only has one princess who has been childless for many years, and the heroine enters the palace with her beautiful sister. But these are the only similarities. Both articles are very good and make people happy to read them. Objectively speaking, there is no plagiarism!

Where is the plagiarism? It's not the same at all.

Someone plagiarized your article

Why is it still empty? Can I get a refund if I have two empty chapters?

Why is it still empty? Can I get a refund if I have two empty chapters?

It's good to watch, although there's no thrilling plot, but overall it's still good!

It's good to watch, although there's no thrilling plot, but overall it's still good.

No matter what happens, you can't treat your own children equally with those of others. There will always be a biased side.