Gotham Detective

How to put it this way, the problem of the "no-kill" principle of DC's mainstream heroes is quite common, involving human nature, morality, bottom line, social impact, etc. Although it is a bit troublesome, I still want to explain it in detail for you and the others (some sentences are from other places, borrowing flowers to offer to Buddha). After all, this is a hurdle that fans who like Dachao or other heroes who have the no-kill principle must pass. First of all, for Batman personally, the bottom line of "no killing" is the last criterion he uses to distinguish himself from the criminals he hates. Whether in movies, comics, animations, or any official description, Batman's name as the Dark Knight is not just to look cool. Everyone should have seen his methods of dealing with criminals. In front of him, he used lynching, violent methods, mental intimidation and the like without any mercy. Even in most people's hearts, Batman would be considered a sadist. In fact, some works do have this tendency. There is an original plot that some Batman fans like very much. The master said, "On Tuesday, Wayne Enterprises donated $350,000 to the Gotham Association for the Disabled." So I won't feel guilty if I cripple a criminal on Friday." The various means used by the master to achieve his goals are sometimes beyond the reach of criminals. He will not hesitate to take advantage of the kindness of his opponents to win, ignore the right to privacy and monitor everyone - no matter enemies or relatives, and formulate plans that can destroy the alliance and target comrades who are close to him in life and death - of course, his original intention is not to destroy. His behavior is not just that of a good old Superman. Many heroes in the league have considerable objections to this, because Batman often looks far more dangerous than a criminal. But even if many heroes have objections to Batman, distance themselves from him, and are disgusted by his cold personality, no one can really ask him to correct himself and still trust his command. Even most heroes in the league respect him instead of being hostile. This is because although such a "Dark Knight" is cold, he also has a clear bottom line of rules. They all know that he will never cross that line - "killing people", and as long as he remembers this, he will not really lose control. Just like what Nietzsche said, "Whoever fights with the devil must be careful that he also becomes a devil in the fight. When you look into the abyss, the abyss is also watching you." - Its meaning is far heavier than the literal meaning. Secondly, for society, it is correct to say that Batman's non-killing is to protect himself, but it is also to protect those innocent ordinary people. Some people are going to say, like the Joker or other dangerous and cruel super criminals, they keep escaping from prison after being caught by the heroes. If they don't kill them, there will always be more victims. Why can't Batman or other superheroes kill one person and save more people? Could it be that you are afraid of getting your hands dirty? Then he proposed that if in reality, those criminals really appeared around us, everyone would definitely think that the person who can kill the clown is the real hero. Regarding this point, I will not say anything like "reality is different from fantasy world. Fantasy world itself is a projection of people's theoretical world, and there is no point in discussing these." "Screenwriters have a hard time coming up with a classic villain. Killing them in one round is too wasteful." "In reality, the country can definitely send troops to kill criminals - terrorists - without mercy, and no one can become a super criminal." I have mentioned these reasons in one sentence (although they are all correct). People who really don't understand will definitely be dissatisfied with these words. I just want everyone to imagine for themselves, when you know that there is a person around you - or a person in an alliance - who has the power of life and death freely outside the existing laws. They possess ultra-modern technology to monitor the world, and possess terrifying force that cannot be contained by the state. They act independently and go their own way. Their method of justice is through violence and killing. As for the destruction and death of innocent lives caused in the process? No one dares to stand up and accuse, because they are above everything and become the sanctioners of mankind. Do they feel like the emperors or gods described in the book? But everyone must understand that no matter how wise the emperor is, it is impossible for him to never make mistakes. When heroes exercise their divine power of judgment,

I didn't kill Boren, but Boren died because of me. I look down on Batman's principle of not killing. Rather than punishing rape and eradicating evil, it is more about satisfying his own sense of justice. To a certain extent, Batman is also one of those villains. I like to say that forgiving him is a matter of God. I am only responsible for sending him to see God. To eliminate evil is to promote good. Goodness without principles and bottom line is not advisable.

😄 Starting point There are almost no fan fiction about DC, and the rest are basically Marvel. I'm tired of reading them. The routines are basically the same. Marvel mainly has a grand background, many people with super powers, and complicated relationships. DC mainly focuses on Lao Ye and Da Chao. It is simple but difficult to write. After seeing this from the author, I hope I can stick to it.

I really have no love for DC. . . . Too dark. . . . . . A bunch of bad guys, no matter how many people they kill and how many bad things they do, Batman will protect them. As long as they are not killed by others, they will continue to do bad things after being caught by Batman.

It's too poisonous. Halfway through the movie, Barbara was kissed by a mud monster? The description was so detailed that I was convinced by the author.

Gotham City is a city with simple folk customs, Arkham has many talented people, and the real criminals are Black Gate Prison. The crazy clown, the sexy thief Catwoman, and the lustful and greedy Penguin. Hell and Heaven Two-Face, Clue Crime Riddler, and Mr. Freeze. The despicable scarecrow, the kaleidoscopic sludge monster, and the environmentalist Poison Ivy. The broken-backed madman Poison Bane, the murmurer, and the deformed and bestial Killer Croc. The crazy and witty Mei Hali, the extremely narcissistic Mad Hatter, and the undying ambition Lei Xiaogu. Psychologist Dr. Strange, underground leader Black Mask, self-inflicted murderer Zas. The 100-year-old is a pig-faced man, a sinful and conspiratorial person, and a half-matched twin. The top killer Deathshot, the mutant monster Dr. Phosphorus, and the Black Glove Gang Painbo. Crime date calendar man, greedy crazy great white shark, criminal organization network nerd. Bizarre criminal mime, drug-addled bat monster, second generation Robin Red Hood. A wretched brother, a crippled catman, a rainbow monster with paint sprayed on his body, a weird and criminal kid. Violent law enforcement and brutal prison guards, tragic massacre of reapers, and frightening female conspirators. The pyromaniac Firefly, the genetically mutated killer moth, and the ventriloquist woman with half her face disfigured. The copycat Kingpin is a sleeper, the underworld gangster Anthony, and the ventriloquist thug Fat Rhino. A disgusting and perverted ogre, transformed into a threesome, disguised as a Zorro Knight. The harmless Templer on the surface, the old kung fu master, and the new dark side of the crazy dean. The time criminal Clock King, severely delusional Maxine, fat Lipu Big Tent. Rex, a super-combustible phosphorus fire, meets the enemy with a crowd, a trihedron, a humanoid toad monster. The powerful and perverted Frago, the rice fucking Thalia, and the fire-stealing god Pros. Split Personality Reptile, Holy Warrior Death Angel, Servant of the Lord Paladin. Two perverts, big fat kids, have severe fantasies about the Pharaoh, and the gangster killer Black Zeiss. Kung fu strongman Mei Xiwa, martial arts master Whitebird, and gangster Rupert. Falcone Roman, son of Rome Abeto, inquiry echo beauty assistant.

It's really stinky and long, and the character development of the protagonist is really awkward. A person who became a detective just for fun, but after time travel, he inexplicably has a no-kill principle.

A bunch of people are against DC's no-killing principle. I'm stupid. Didn't the DC editor show you what these people look like after they break through the bottom line? Injustice Superman, the Batman Who Laughs team, etc.

I want to complain about Queque but I don't know where to start. It can be said that this book is wonderful when taken apart, but when combined, it is a bit miserable, because the protagonist relies on brainpower to win at the beginning, but after meeting the clown, he starts to become Shazam (exaggeration). In fact, these are okay. For me, I just don't understand why the protagonist should be set to be closer to Batman. What the protagonist has experienced is very different from what Batman has experienced, so not being like Batman is the right approach.

The main character in Gotham is Lin Shaotian, who is extremely poisonous.

Damn it, even if you haven't watched Batman, Batman's identity is not a secret. He is about six feet tall, weighs about two hundred pounds, is about thirty or forty years old, a well-built white male, and has a lot of money and scientific research power. He can develop Batman fighter jets and other luxury protection equipment... Who is this person? It's almost obvious... How can he be a detective? ? ?

I also agree with what some people in the comment section said. The protagonist is like a schizophrenic. When the detective is a genius, he uses his brain. When fighting, it's like another setting where he doesn't use his brain at all to force injuries or mistakes. Then the writing always emphasizes that the protagonist still makes mistakes after using his brain. I can understand it once and twice, but it is always inconsistent with his usual settings, okay? The writing was good at the beginning, but starting from chapter 170, the setting started to not follow logic. The appearance of the bishop is the beginning of the plot collapse. Other readers will slowly understand it.

I still prefer Marvel. DC's non-killing may have various reasons, but none of them can cover up the consequences caused by their non-killing. How many ordinary people have suffered avoidable harm because of this. I prefer "kill to stop killing".

Some people have been complaining about the no-killing principle of superheroes. Isn't it normal for a good person not to kill? Some people also say that the reason why criminals come out and kill innocent people is due to the no-kill principle of superheroes. People who think this way have no brains, right? Shouldn't it be the prison guard's responsibility to let criminals escape? Isn't it to blame that the death penalty is so difficult to execute?

A very simple question, you can kill people by yourself, but what if one day you kill by mistake? 🙂

Why are so many people discussing the no-kill principle? Although I don't know what happened, I will provide you with a point of view. These superheroes, what people generally call them because of what they do, what else are they besides heroes? Vigilante. Yes, they are not righteous judges, righteous prosecutors, or righteous soldiers. They are vigilantes. So, it is none of their business to kill or not. If they are defeated, they can just leave it to the government to solve the problem. How are criminals judged, what are the consequences, and what does it have to do with the [police]? When you see a criminal, you stop him, arrest him, and hand him over to the judiciary for trial. When a criminal threatens your life, you should use your right to self-defense. Whether you want to defend yourself until the other party absolutely loses the ability to threaten you (death) is your own personal consideration.

After reading it for the second time, I suddenly realized that there are actually many details worth pondering in this book. For example, the psychological activities of many characters are not fully described, leaving gaps for the foreshadowing of the characters' actions. It is recommended that Stranger also think about it carefully to lay a better foundation for the new book. American comic lovers can also put forward more suggestions and opinions to help the author improve, so that we can see more and better new books. What do you think?

Regarding the no-kill principle. The brave man defeated the evil dragon, and the brave man soaked in the dragon's blood became another evil dragon.

The description of the protagonist doesn't look like someone who works with his brain at all. He almost looks like a schizophrenic. Is this what the so-called genius detective looks like? It can only be said that the excellent writing conceals the shortcomings of the plot.

Personally (emphasis not to criticize) I think Sin is a good American comic and I hope the author will return. Like please

It feels like an American drama (personally, don't comment if you don't like it)

I drew it a year ago, but I haven't posted it yet. To some extent, the detective hero has always been very good🎉❣️🎉

I couldn't stand the silent film anymore after seeing it. The movie was a piece of shit, and here, at least where I saw it, it was completely copied from the movie.

Who knows who the heroine is, let alone Barbara, I am more traditional and can't accept that kind of woman 😥

{"TopicId":"1134215008248266752","TopicName":"Collection of Masterpieces"} This is an old book I read back then. I really miss it.

The best book by Moke, bar none

Is the heroine of this novel the Mad Hatter's sister Alice in the American TV series Gotham?

It's very well written, and I recommend a new book of the same type, "I Was a Detective in Southeast Asia". [Criminal Investigation] + [Reasoning] + [Anti-Crime] + [Single Female Protagonist] Chinese police detective Link relies on his extraordinary ability to "look back at crimes" to solve criminal cases and sweep away all the major evil and dark forces in Southeast Asia, becoming a legend.

Gotham without the death penalty

It is indeed possible to write, but it may conflict with my current needs. I originally thought that the protagonist would be in a detective setting, which means that the protagonist should use his brain and layout to achieve corresponding success. He usually builds some equipment such as long-range technological weapons. However, after looking at it for a while, the protagonist completely looks like a replica of Batman. It is a bit strange that Batman's uniform is paired with a detective character.