Ruling Hollywood

The protagonist is too double-standard. Don't let others set the unspoken rules and then do it yourself. Movies are not made to make money. If there are big-selling movies, don't make them to create niche ones. Completely incomprehensible. The author is completely illiterate. I can't understand the main character's thoughts at all. On the one hand, I am innocent and at the same time want to be romantic. I just want others to come to me and then I can walk away. There is no need to pay any responsibility

There are a lot of informative texts about film and television, such as some rules and conventions of American dramas. . . Etc. Large paragraphs of informational text, plus a lot of off-site descriptions. What I mean by off-site descriptions is, for example, the background introduction of the predecessor of the bishop at the beginning, which is a rather large paragraph of text description. I am not saying that this is not necessary, but I think it needs to be as concise and condensed as possible. Although the background of the predecessor can promote the plot, I think it can be explained slowly and continuously in the subsequent plots. There are also too many related explanatory texts during the heart-to-heart talk between the bishop's father and the bishop, such as independent movies and so on. Originally, readers were not interested in learning about these things, and I still wanted to know more about them. However, I felt that such writing was too concentrated, and it felt to me that it was tearing away the coherence of the plot. A plot emerges, like dialogue, like action. Then there is a long paragraph of informational text, which is really uncomfortable to read. Then there is a lot of nonsense. For example, the views on plagiarism only appeared twice when I saw the fifteenth chapter. In my opinion, it is completely unnecessary. Why explain so much? Everyone who reads rebirth novels knows that if you don't plagiarize, what the hell are you doing? As a reader, not a writer, my writing skills are insufficient, and my commenting skills are not very high, but at least one thing is the comfort of reading. I may not be able to analyze a work as thoroughly as a critic, but I will experience whether it is comfortable or not. This is not to say that this article has serious flaws, but some things, at least to me, do not seem to be very smooth, and the reading comfort is somewhat lacking.

Originally, I wasn't very impressed by Theron, and I thought it wasn't that important. But her confession---if the author writes about winning stories, then there has been improvement, and it's not like others say that she is not good at writing about women. I thought she was the heroine of King Kong