Moscow in Flames

I have been reading this book a few days ago and finished it the day before yesterday. It is very well written. Let me give you a brief introduction first. The protagonist time travels into the body of a Soviet female soldier named Lida, who is the heroine in "The Dawns Here Are Quiet", but the time is changed to 1941. First person, In terms of writing: it's good and fluent, and the later words are much smoother than the first 300,000 words. Cheating level: low And the author has done a lot of homework, so that some chapters look like direct copies of historical materials. There are some unreasonable things, but the flaws are not concealed. Generally speaking, it is still very rigorous. Perhaps because the author lives in Russia, reading this book feels like watching a Soviet movie, because the dialogues of the characters all have a "Russian" flavor, and the Russian speaking habits are well expressed. It may be because the author lives in Russia. What impressed me most was that the author emphasized the difference between "you" and "you". The former represents guarded alienation, while the latter can only be addressed by people who are close to each other. So you can see in this book that most people use the word you, and there are many more, such as the issue of patronymic and birth name. Perhaps it is because of these details that people feel like watching a Soviet movie. Summary: The dialogue between the characters has a Russian flavor and the cultural details are good. The protagonist, Goldfinger, is not so unfaithful. She has inherited the skills of the original and the knowledge of later generations, and she is doing well. Note that I said "doing well". In fact, the protagonist's early command of the battle and victory are often based on luck, and the author has repeatedly emphasized that the protagonist's command ability is insufficient. For example: Because the protagonist knew in advance how much damage winter would cause to the Nazi army, he decisively attacked in the defense of Moscow and won a huge victory and got the position of major general at once. He didn't show much military literacy, he couldn't read a map, and he didn't even understand the configuration of the army. Perhaps the author wanted to hone the military qualities of the protagonist and asked the impulsive protagonist to shoot dozens of Nazi prisoners because of Zoya's incident (he was Baidu Zoya). Because they were secretly abducted by reporters and reported, it caused adverse effects. She got into trouble, and her superiors wanted to punish her. With the plea of ​​her patron Zhukov, she was only demoted to major, from major general to major (and now major general again). Then her superiors treat her like a panacea, and the protagonist is impulsive and straightforward. When she sees her superiors' mistakes in command, she can't help but come up with a better plan of her own. This immature approach also makes her find that she is thankless. Even if her plan succeeds, nothing will happen to her. I digress. In short, the protagonist is a kind and straightforward person. She sympathizes with her subordinates and hates the practice of blindly using the blood of soldiers to win victory. Although this has caused her a lot of pain, she has never changed her approach. The author has done a good job in this regard. He does not let the world revolve around the protagonist. The protagonist's setbacks make her more mature, rather than using the hand of God to wipe out her enemies and obstacles. This is what I like. The protagonist is like a witness to history, not a person who changes history. She does not bring anything cool to change history. When the Soviet Union believed that the direction of the German army's general attack was not Stalingrad, the protagonist knew that even if she told her superiors, it would be futile, because no one would believe it and she would be angry. However, she still chose to report it. Even if the hope was slim, she was willing to risk her career for it. She asked her superiors who admired her to report to Stalin, but she was scolded. Because the protagonist's thoughts are different from those of this era in some aspects, she is often shot by the violent Ministry of Internal Affairs. Of course, she is saved every time by a backer (all kinds of backers have been found in the early stage). She almost died several times, making readers grit their teeth at the unreasonable Ministry of Internal Affairs. Then the Ministry of Internal Affairs was not retaliated by the law of causality weapon and continued to embarrass the protagonist... The author has always deliberately suppressed the development of the protagonist and prevented her from being promoted too quickly. I think this is very good. Commanding an army group in combat is not interesting. Moreover, with so many achievements, the protagonist will probably reach Zhukov's status in the later stage. It is not easy to write - reporting a Datong number and commanding troops are not interesting. The protagonist is a stubborn person who always

The quality of the book is pretty good. I have a few suggestions. First, you don't have to write it completely according to history. Just like the Romance of the Three Kingdoms and the Chronicle of the Three Kingdoms, there are far more people who like to read the romance than those who like to read the romance. Most of the people who give you rewards are people who like to read the romance. When writing a novel, you write a story rather than a history. The general line is good. Other characters or time can be adapted appropriately. 2. The characteristics of the characters are not outstanding enough. Let's take the Romance of the Three Kingdoms as an example. Many characters in the novel have distinct characteristics and readers can distinguish them clearly. In your novel, if readers who have not watched movies about the Patriotic War will have a hard time remembering who the generals are against. Most of them have the same face. For example, this Vlasov, you can put He portrayed characters like Wei Yan or Zhang Jia (I say him now because his role is almost over and will not have much impact on the author's conception), as well as the previous Soviet generals. Although many died early and had few roles, why not refer to the techniques of Liu Pi, Gong Du, Yan Liang, and Wen Chou in shaping them? Loyal and brave. 3. The way of fighting, the Soviet army seems to be too rigid. The description of the battle is more like the Three Kingdoms. It can be appropriately added with the elements of the romance, and it is a battle of wits and courage. The rigidity of the Soviet army also sets off the low IQ of the German generals, making the process not exciting enough. In fact, these generals are very good, but there are too many, which makes everyone a little aesthetically tired. This is where you can play. The above are just suggestions. If you don't like them, you can ignore them. After all, the author's own ideas are the most important.

Please don't make it! In this historical context, there is no need for such long-term rivalry. . . One more such fictitious non-partner opponent will cause more plot bugs. . . Would you like to be a little more reasonable? . . Isn't it okay if I don't have the blood of a little white dog? I beg the author to think carefully! War is not a TV series, so don't be so coincidental. . . And if there is an imaginary male senior officer, that one is the protagonist. If there is a protagonist who occupies the senior officer, the plot can be changed. . . No matter how many there are, it feels like there are too many protagonists... Having too many protagonists is definitely evil! Not all of this book is heroic. . . . I beg the author not to add a lifelong rival! Just some short-term backups will be enough. . . I beg you and I have been waiting for a year. I don't want to be dragged into the ditch just after updating this book! 😭😭😭

Looking forward to extras such as "Valkyrie in the Far East", "Red War Goddess in the Cold War", "1991, Turning the Tide"...

Recently, I read the book "Struggle in Soviet Russia" from an external website. It currently has more than 900,000 words. The time is one year before Germany attacks the Soviet Union. The protagonist is engaged in intelligence, starting from a small boss. He is currently the chairman of the National Security Bureau and a member of the Central Committee, in charge of foreign intelligence, and is very trusted by Stalin. Highly recommended

Fourteen years have passed in a flash. I only read the first few chapters and didn't read to the end. I didn't expect that I had written so many words. It can be called a masterpiece!

I originally thought that "Moscow is Burning" would be the beginning of Soviet-German war novels, but I didn't expect it to be the pinnacle. Both "Red Moscow" and "Soviet Union 1941" have many problems, and there are many places that are seriously inconsistent with history.

Moscow is Burning is an extremely realistic time-travel novel. The author should have spent a lot of effort to research many historical events and characters of the former Soviet Union's Patriotic War. It mentioned that the extremely arrogant and domineering Ministry of Internal Affairs was one of the reasons for the disintegration of the former Soviet Union.

Only by getting close to Lao Maozi can you know what they are like. As a Northeasterner, the impression I heard from the oldest generation is that the little devil is hateful! Lao Maozi is even more hateful

After looking at the table of contents, conquering Berlin is all? I can't write about the Northeast, there is still a lot of content! The Cold War, the Soviet Communist Party's many years of mistakes, and the fact that it would be about 70 years old in 1991. . . Why don't you explain these? .