Our World War

Who stipulates that those who travel through time will definitely succeed? They will definitely not make mistakes? Who stipulated that time-travelers can lead a country to complete reform and rejuvenation from the inside out? Who stipulates that a dynasty will not decline after it becomes strong? Who stipulated that a time traveler must be a genius who knows everything and can do anything? Can't this time-traveler only know how to fight and not develop? Can't his empire be restored or retrogressed? If we treat aliens with modern hatred, we will definitely succeed, and it must be correct, right? In this novel, the time-traveling Emperor Apocalypse is not the protagonist. He is just an ordinary person who made meritorious deeds, made mistakes, and finally left the world. Some things he did, some things he had no time to do or would not do at all. Isn't this okay? Isn't it interesting to not watch how living people develop and forge ahead, but to dwell on a dead person and a piece of past history? Finally, Long Ling just wants to ask: Do you really believe that a person who travels back to ancient times can use the things in his mind to change many issues, from social forms to scientific systems, and then to cultural ideas?

A novel that could have become a god, I don't want to just disappear into the data at the starting point.

What a pity - this book! It could have been a very good book, but it was emasculated by the author! Because this book itself has grand historical scenes, characters that can be explored deeply, and finally there are fierce conflict scenes that can be carved out. All of these were eunuchs that the author could not control, and he suddenly gave up when he could have been getting better! But who cares about readers' feelings? What a cheat!

Well, these chapters seem a bit out of touch, but the main point I want to express is how the Ming Empire transformed from decadence to enlightenment, and finally reached its current situation. There are natural disasters and man-made disasters, internal strife and external wars. Of course, there are about 2,000 words of "private goods". If you don't like it, Long Ling apologizes to you here. This is really not intentional... It's just that Long Ling felt it was necessary to briefly describe the cause and process.

The idea is good, but the description of the world structure is unrealistic, as well as the details of the peace talks. A large empire is timid when several countries say they want to block the door. Although there is a number one Britain, but looking at the pattern of this book, what kind of colonies does Britain have to maintain a global presence? In reality, the UK relied mainly on India and North America to maintain its global presence. India was the exporter of raw materials and North America was the dumping ground for goods. The decline of Britain began after the independence of the United States. If the Qing Dynasty had not replaced the position of the dumping ground for American goods, Britain would have declined long ago. I don't understand how the British national power is so strong in the book. Are there only a few areas on earth that can afford such a global presence, or is Ming itself a dumping ground? But judging from the description in the article, it doesn't look like it. Ceylon and Japan are even more unlikely.

Feudal society was already backward, and I was confused when I saw this mixture of World War II style and Ming Dynasty feudal society.

The author's understanding and generalization of bolt-action rifles and individual rapid-fire weapons is simply ridiculous. During World War I, how many bolt-action rifles had an effective range of one thousand meters? The understanding of trench warfare is also full of errors. Battleship combat is also full of errors.

In fact, the book that the author chose to give up is the real masterpiece.

To be honest, this kind of subject matter is not flattering. The author himself may not realize that such a subject matter must be very hard-core in order to be good. The background layout is unattractive. Maybe it's because the story is easy to write, maybe it's because of the habit of thinking. The enemy still hasn't changed his facial makeup. This is the kind of subject matter where detail and imagination are everything. Otherwise, it is better to write a cool article about ZTE and Ming Dynasty leading various East Asian brothers to confront Europe and the United States.

After the Ming Dynasty Industrial Revolution, can the Jin Dynasty and the Japs still rise? What the hell?