Common Man in the World

Good people deserve to die, right? Author. According to what you said, people who do good deeds should die.

What kind of answer is that? Good people should be held at gunpoint

It's obvious that the author didn't write this book to make money 🤭 Play with the literary youth fan

It can be seen from the opening chapter that the characters created by the author all have their own omissions and are not flawless characters. So can I make the following deduction? According to the author's logic, these victims deserve revenge for their loved ones. Regardless of whether Lord Shen is a good person or not, he is the murderer of his relatives, so Lord Shen deserves to die. Then the people who were saved by Master Shen before also have reasons to come to the door. So how will the previous group of people respond? Will they be killed at the neck, or will they defend their lives to the death? If it is to be killed at the neck, then the logic has completed the closed loop. If one person is involved in another person, there may not be a few people left in the world. If you fight to the death to defend your own life, it will become a game no bigger than a fist. If you are more skilled, you will survive, and if you are less skilled, you will die. There is no reason to explain, and the final outcome may be death on the roadside. After all, no one in the book is perfect, and there are always times of negligence. Both of these endings will cause a large number of people to die, and are full of realism. It always feels like the spirit of martial arts is lacking. After all, martial arts is a kind of romantic fantasy, which is about wanting a kind of perfection without reason, strong martial arts, saving people, it is so chic and classy. However, these realism factors added by the author make the novel less martial arts, and the chivalry is not perfect. It always has to choose between dilemmas, but it doesn't look like martial arts anymore. This is just my humble opinion, I hope Haihan will accept it.

The writing is quite good. It describes the sentient beings behind the heroes. Those who were accidentally injured by the heroes have reason to take revenge. After all, it was the heroes who hurt them. No matter what the reason is, whether it is for the common people or for righteousness, the heroes' deaths are not innocent. Saving people and killing people is not a matter of quantity, but the main reason why the heroes died was because they had too much responsibility for the world. If it were Han Li or Fang Yuan, this problem would not have occurred. Ha ha.

In the first chapter, people are not dogs. People have the right to deal with dogs because dogs are not people. According to the logic of the protagonist, after killing Shen, he should commit suicide.

The logic is untenable. Killing for money? When you can't even determine what's right or wrong, you have no martial arts skills and it all depends on luck.

The writing is good, but the plot is poorly handled.

The familiar name turns out to be the author of Xuan Xia

The first two chapters were absorbed immediately, and they are full of ancient flavor. But will the direction of values ​​​​be a little inconsistent with the taste of some book friends? Can it be downplayed, or can it be patched to leave room for leeway?

Personal feelings, Chapter 2, will let me know why there is a bad world with five turbidities, making bad things worse, *good*, everything has a reason if

I haven't read it yet. Is the content interesting? If I feel confused and uncomfortable while reading this article, I still won't read it.

I don't understand why the author wrote this