Fengshen: I, Emperor Xin, Work Hard to Cure the Disease

I want to laugh when I think of the ten deadly sins later listed by the literati for Emperor Xin. The first one is to destroy people for sacrifice, and the second one is to use slaves. I have forgotten what the next few are. The funniest thing in history is that because his eldest son and second son took the initiative to open the gate of the capital to surrender when Zhou destroyed Shang, they did not receive rewards from the Emperor of Zhou and had their merits wiped out. They were not even recorded. Instead, in order to appease the surrender faction, the youngest son of Emperor Xin and Daji was enfeoffed into a vassal.

I think many people feel that human sacrifice is not good. In fact, it was very common at that time. If you are in a good mood, sacrifice one, sacrifice one if you are not, sacrifice one when you are hungry, and sacrifice one if you are not hungry to thank your ancestors. It feels good, it seems to be Qiang, and it is useless if you don't kill people. Can you mine and pave roads?

In fact, I hate to belittle King Wu of Zhou to the point where he seizes the power to surrender and carve up the fate of the human race. It is acceptable to accept that King Zhou is not pure in mind and is ambitious. After all, the Zhou Dynasty has given China too many intentions. The Yuan Saint Zhou Gongdan has etched etiquette into our bones. Confucius said that self-denial and restoration of etiquette are the influence of Zhou Gongdan on China. The repercussions are unavoidable. In recent years, those who have blamed King Zhou have brought the King of Zhou and even the Zhou Dynasty into disrepute. This book is about King Zhou, but we cannot let King Zhou be such a clown. Anyway, most of them are our sages. King Wen performed the gossip, King Wu established the dynasty, divided the princes, Jiang Shang was the chief priest of Wucheng Temple, King Wu Cheng, the military ancestor Taigong Wang, Zhou Gong formulated the Zhou rites, Cheng It is an important reference for the etiquette of later generations and has a profound influence on later generations. I cannot accept that the author really writes about Zhou Dynasty like the introduction. I also hate that Taoism is raised so high, higher than Fuxi, Huangdi, Haotian, etc. Taoism is the latest to appear, and he is the earliest to compile Taoism. The disciple should be from the human race. This is the sage. I don't like to ruin the Buddha. The Buddha means the enlightened person and is human-oriented. The status of Zhunti and Jieyin in Buddhism is not high. Buddhism is very much like the work of the devil's son and the devil. Buddhism is essentially closer to our Confucianism and does not need gods and Buddhas. Now the gods and Buddhas are put together.

I want to ask, is this a pure world of gods or one with the prehistoric worldview added to it?

Isn't it true that the Shang Dynasty was worse than the Zhou Dynasty in terms of belief in gods and ghosts? The purpose of King Zhou or the kings of his previous generations was not to oppose theocracy but to fight for the right to interpret with the sacrificial class. It was more about centralizing power and taking all the sacrifices to himself. Almost all the laws of the Shang Dynasty were made by gods. How could he go against his own orthodoxy?

Without the strength of a saint, the result of becoming a god will not change. Leader Tongtian can block three (the four saints will break the formation), and Nuwa can fight for it. If you also have the strength of a saint, the outcome of becoming a god can be changed.

The Shang and Zhou dynasties have also been polluted by online literature. Many people do not distinguish between real-life backgrounds and novel processing. They feel that they are systematically subverting traditional Chinese history. They always post some so-called Zhou who changed the history of the Shang dynasty in the previous dynasty and lowered himself to the status of human emperor. Carefully screen and do not be fooled by the pseudo-historical theories from the source! Pseudo-historical theory has destroyed China's traditional history by using various literary inquisitions or novels to spread unofficial history!

Daji got the first blood 😏😏

Different people perceive different historical figures. If you don't accept the characters in the novel, they will look awkward and you won't be able to read them. Jiuchi Meat Forest? Are there those conditions? Debauchery? In history, Emperor Xin has only one son, but in romance, he has two. King Wen of Zhou Dynasty had dozens of women, so how many women would he have to help him give birth? ! Di Xin, Shihuang Huang, Yang Guang, as well as Zhu Qizhen and Zhu Houzhao, I think they are all men with careers and ideas! The history books are all slandering him! With him!

I remembered that there was a book about working hard in the past.

Hey hey hey, isn't it? Just three chapters after it's released. It's too censorious 😰

Xia Jie, Shang Zhou, Sui Yang, who else?