The Richest Man Started from the AI ​​Wave

After reading this novel, I feel that it satisfies my imagination of the elite middle class, but I don't know if this is true? I have never been in contact with this class. But the only shortcoming of this novel is that the emotional line is not very well written, especially the part where his neighbor is a widow. This is not China decades ago. Why do some people still think that after a divorce, it must be the ex-husband's fault, and then the ex-husband must make trouble. Urban novels all have plots like this. What can I say? They are too samey, and the key point is that I don't know why. In urban novels, many protagonists involve widows. I don't know why. Is it because divorced women with children are so popular?

The author is most likely an insider and writes very professionally, which makes some content incomprehensible to those in the non-AI programming industry. But that doesn't stop this from being a good novel, and it's not as impressive as it was at the beginning. Starting a business starts from AI code bug detection, to AI programming, to large code models, and now to general large models. It's great that this is done to solve an initial project problem or moat, and then naturally extends to the next project. Disadvantage 1: Currently, the heroine has a tendency to speculate in stocks. She started to start a business with female college classmates. One is a technical developer and the other is a product manager. She thought she was the heroine. Then a neighbor came out and said she was an illustrator. This is a bit poisonous because the protagonist asked the illustrator to do the UI interface design. There is also a female lawyer. The lawyer is very professional and helps the author solve many problems, which is okay. Disadvantage 2: If the protagonist is a bit idealistic, then that is the second flaw. The story begins with the protagonist as an unemployed person reporting a B-round (preparing) company that raised tens of billions of dollars for leaking data to Southeast Asia and false data. The flaws do not hide the good points, the protagonist's way of solving problems is really great, and the fairy grass starts. Highly recommended! ! !

The writing is very good, very good. Come on, author, don't give up or lower the quality. Another question is how can I help you increase the popularity of this book and get better results?

It's good-looking and hard-core, and it at least describes the common problems and operational logic of most Internet companies.

The storyboards of the characters are so immersive that sometimes it feels like you are watching a movie. The details are written very professionally and not casually. If you have read too many novels on fantasy and other themes, this book is an excellent book for a change.

The plot is very ordinary, but the content is beautifully written. It has the feeling of a heavy sword without a sharp edge, which is ingenious and unworkable. It is a perspective that is difficult for ordinary people to see.

Let's talk about the conclusion first. The quality of this book can make you a god! I have been reading online articles for more than ten years, and now I am becoming more and more selective in reading. Many of the top 20 books on the monthly ticket list can't be read. In the past few years, the two best books I have read are Mr. Fang with a heart of ice in the jade pot, and the second is Mr. Yu from Lingang Carbon Silicon. Now there is a third book, Mr. Han from Haicheng. Mr. Han's book is too good to be written by a newcomer. It is better than most great masters, and it does not have as many routines and tricks as those in Platinum. The rhythm is very tight. I write so much for those who are still waiting to see it. Don't hesitate. It's very good-looking and doesn't have any bad points. It is one of the top 100 urban articles in the monthly popular list. In terms of quality, it ranks among the top three. I guarantee it with my nearly 20 years of experience in reading urban online articles. The last time I wrote something like this was in Mr. Bingxin Xiaofang's book. The first hundred chapters of that book were too dissuasive. Later, I became a god. I hope this book can have better results. The current results are not worthy of the quality of this book.

It's rare to find a book that "I can't understand, it's not that there's something wrong with his writing". The author also thoughtfully answers many abbreviations in the notes. This reading gave me a contradictory and strange reading experience of being difficult (the threshold of understanding) and relaxing (the inner character) at the same time - I was very difficult. There were many nouns and terms that I had seen for the first time, but I enjoyed it because the characters did live in such an environment. They experienced and grew up in this way, and there are traces to follow; I am very relaxed because the author is writing about [people], [people] who have emotions, feelings, and thoughts. I don't have to worry about what is inside them. I can explore and understand them with confidence. Even if it is the villain in the book, I can patiently analyze the motivations, as well as the information in behaviors and words... Han Luyi, a programmer, his inner self, his words and deeds, all make me feel that he is alive. It has been too long since I saw a [person] in books. A person who I can learn from, a benchmark for learning how to deal with others, and a hope from the bottom of my heart that people like him exist in the real society, and the possibility is very high. There is no rubbish here that would hurt me, no vulgar jokes, no vulgar jokes, no dirty gangster protagonist, no protagonist whose body is not human, no protagonist whose crimes are too numerous to describe, and whose mere existence makes me uncomfortable... ... Han Luyi, he is a real, bottom-line, world-view, outlook on life, moral values, courageous, ideal, pragmatic, tenacious, decisive, and talented person. He is really great. I am pleasantly surprised and delighted by him.

When I read the latest chapter, a beam of light suddenly shone in the originally depressing road in the distance, and it was not the feeling of being invincible and being slapped in the face, but the feeling of empathizing with the characters in the book, and being able to watch the clouds and see the moon; This book is a breath of fresh air in systematic literature. None of the characters is facial or tool-like. Many comments say that you use the system to gamble and engage in finance, and then pretend to be a slap in the face. Haven't you tired of reading this kind of article? I hope that authors will not be influenced by reviews. Many book authors have been blown away by reviews. You have your own writing rhythm and writing style, and it is difficult to adjust to others. Newbies should take their time with new books, and you will be the next platinum!

I subscribed for more than 40 yuan. This is the book I have read the most since I started. How to judge AI? Money is a trivial matter. This is shocking. Is there something wrong with my aesthetics? ? ? I don't look bad. . . .

To be honest, the protagonist would be regarded as a scab if he engaged in this kind of thing. In the current stage where labor protection is not perfect and material production is not yet extremely rich, using AI to replace middle and low-level technicians in large quantities, eliminating jobs, and eliminating the space for the vertical development of the unemployed population, feels like opening a Pandora's box.

It's really well written. The key is that people really understand it. Nippy. Many self-media Vs who claim to be AI experts don't know as much as the author. If you understand this book, you can understand what the current AI technology is like (I am a heavyweight). A large model user with experience in using various large models. The most difficult thing is that this book also breaks down the underlying logic of data annotation and tells you that, to put it bluntly, you can't learn this kind of knowledge anywhere else.

I don't know if the author has used it, but it doesn't look like it was generated by AI, but I don't know about polishing and checking the information.

Most people at this age must have experienced this. No matter whether they are technicians or scientists, no one is a saint, and they should not be expected to be saints. Therefore, whether it is a single heroine, dual heroines, or even multiple heroines, it should be written according to your imagination. You can write it however you want. It is a matter of course, and you don't need to pay attention to it.

I thought it was a fantasy novel, but it turned out to be a technical novel. The ability can be used on everyone, but not on the heroine. Don't you know how to write it?

Why do some people say that accepting both is unrealistic? What kind of family, class, and personality are you talking about? Cheap or not? I've already read the novel and why do I care what you say?

The most memorable thing about this novel is that it completely breaks out of the comfort zone of the genre. The author has experience and his description of society is true. It does not cater to any routine, the characters are vivid rather than tools, and the ideological core is as sharp as a knife. Reading it is like suddenly encountering a plant you have never seen before in a land that has been repeatedly cultivated to barrenness. It is strange, free, and full of unrepeatable vitality. Read it in one sitting.

I have caught up to the latest chapter, and so far this book is comparable to the reshaping of the millennium. The introduction of the female protagonist lawyer is a highlight, she is professional but not boring, the author is familiar with AI is also one of the highlights, the main line is also very clear, she has been moving towards the goal, and the business battle is also good. All in all, it's a book not to be missed

Taoshu finally paid off, and the current list is really ugly. At a glance, they are all the same type of routine articles. It feels like the good articles are all at the back of the list, and the books at the top of the list are all books by old authors. This is a unique urban business article. It is not a rebirth novel, nor is it a heroic novel. It may not be as refreshing as the two, but it is just right for readers who have eaten too many fast-paced novels. Similarly, because the details are too detailed, it feels like a farming article. The small team and company framework are built step by step. The business territory is slowly expanding, and the sense of expectation is visible to the naked eye. If some of the bad points are improved, it will be a very good book, and hopefully it will be a high-quality book. Overall, it is a story about a senior worker in a large factory who gets a golden finger and is laid off by his old employer, and gradually builds a company framework to expand the business territory and reach the peak of his life. Advantages: 1. Fast pace and appropriate details. Focusing on commercial development, there is no stopping in waves. There is no daily hydrology and there will be no obvious sense of stagnation. Everyone has something to do so far, and the progression of the story is clear. 2. It's refreshing enough, and the sense of anticipation is obvious. That is to first rely on technology to lay off employees of the old employer, and then form a team to build the company. There is an undercurrent of the heroine's emotional line 3. The writing is passable, at an upper-middle level, and it is quite comfortable to read 4. The details of business struggles and internal team fights in large factories are too detailed, which makes up for the shortcomings of the related urban novels that are too extensive in business expansion and rely on daily life to illustrate the story. (The details are so realistic that I feel a little uncomfortable when I read it 😭 The entrepreneurial process of programmers is also very typical. The dilemmas encountered and the obstacles encountered when setting up the company are very real and detailed, and it feels like it can be used as a typical case). 5. At the same time, because the timeline is set in the present, you can see many technologies that are close to the real timeline, which is a great test of the author's own writing skills. However, seeing that the author has written several good business ideas in a row (such as how to break the situation when the opponent has a technical advantage but is hindered by commercialization and is overwhelmed by the opponent's first move and size advantage - start with the opponent's competitor who is backed by a large company and enter the segmented track...), The author may really have relevant experience and be optimistic about future development. Disadvantages: 1. The biggest pain point for other readers at present is that the technical description is too detailed and not very friendly (although I can understand it 😭, it does not mean that readers from non-related industries can understand it) Yes Reduce the detailed description of the technical direction, and instead use concise terminology that can be understood at a glance and be highly summarized (also reduce professional terms), and supplement it with appropriate image metaphors in life to facilitate readers' understanding 2. Your emotional line is a bit twisted. There was Bai Yueguang, a college student, who came over to start a company with me, a female lawyer, and a young woman neighbor. The female lawyer is easy to talk to, but I don't see the use of this young woman neighbor so far, and I don't know how to get involved in the protagonist's business in the future. It is not clear whether it is a story with a single female protagonist or multiple female protagonists. At present, there is basically no description of the emotional line. It focuses on business expansion and has been well received. I hope that the emotional line can be clearly determined in the future, and don't follow the example of those young people who speculate in stocks. 3. The villain's character design is too thin, without detailed description and support, and no review after being slapped in the face, resulting in a major shortcoming in the game. Logically speaking, Chen Bowen should be the small boss, Dr. Zhao should be the middle boss, and the VC named Wang should be the big boss. But you rely on a female lawyer to break Chen Bowen's competitive situation. After breaking the situation, writing Chen Bowen's reaction is too quick and has no real sense. Using technology to slap Dr. Zhao in the face, he learned some lessons and wrote about the psychological changes before and after the incident well, but then disappeared. The vc surnamed Wang is even more so. He is a company executive, has a lot of resources, and is quite shrewd. At present, it is the big boss in the early stage, but there is no detailed description. I just don't feel much satisfaction after you win. 😦 4. The protagonist may be set to be relatively calm and rational, without major emotional ups and downs, and the character design feels not distinctive enough. There is no feeling of pleasure after slapping an opponent in the face, and there is no big reaction (such as excitement, excitement, anticipation, imagination about the future, etc.) After the upgrade of Gold Finger. After relying on Gold Finger technology to monetize, the company and the team have no big feelings. These are obviously times when nodes are settled one by one, and a symbol is needed to impress the readers, which can be emotional or material gains. Currently, only the love line can slightly cause the protagonist's emotional fluctuations, which is a bit flat. 5. There are no big poisonous spots, but many small thorns. I won't mention it here, I'll just revise it according to the points that have been commented on a lot, and it will be a very good urban article.

The rhythm is very good, the logical closed loop is very neat, and it doesn't look abrupt at all. It's really good.

After following it for another week, I feel that the tone and direction of this novel are clearer. Let me briefly discuss a few points that everyone has discussed a lot 1. The golden finger is not good, why don't you do other things to make a fortune, and upgrading is not fun enough? In the first chapter, the author said that there is a mention of "reality" in it. Is it possible that the author himself The main line I want to write is a realistic entrepreneurial article, not a stream of system upgrades flying all over the world. The golden finger is an opportunity and an auxiliary to the plot of the novel. After all, to be honest, if there were no golden fingers at all, it would be almost impossible to realize what is written in this novel no matter how realistic it is. Everyone knows how cruel the real reality is. 2. There is too much English and it is difficult to understand: It is true that the visual experience may not be good for people who have no daily contact at all, but if it is completely translated into a Chinese novel, it will be distorted, because in reality, these English programming system languages ​​​​are not replaced by Chinese. Programmer slang and financial slang penetrate so deeply. This expression is more true, but the author has added small bubbles to help understanding. 3. This article is written for programmers, and laymen cannot understand it: skipping the incomprehensible parts does not affect understanding. In fact, as the male protagonist gradually leaves the technical position and upgrades to the coordinating role, the description of technical details should become less and less. 4. The wheel of history moves much faster than we imagine. You either push it, be pushed by it, or be rolled over by it. I read this novel with a prying and learning mentality, because AI has gone from its emergence to penetration faster and more violently than the industrial revolution and the Internet revolution. As a non-practitioner, when I watch the news flying all over the sky every day, I have a feeling that I have missed something. But my understanding will not stop the speed at which AI is coming towards me. Optimistic or pessimistic, our lives can no longer be avoided by saying "I am not a programmer and I don't need to understand AI". To give an unpleasant example: In the early years, when the general environment was stable, everyone had an iron rice bowl. When the wave of the times first emerged, those who came out to test the waters were inferior to others. But in the blink of an eye, the social structure was changed, the industry was reshuffled, and the wheel of history passed over thousands of families who thought that these changes had nothing to do with them. Some are not predicted, and some are unable to do anything when they predict. Now we are facing a similar environmental upheaval, this time global, with bigger wheels and faster speeds. The author's choice to set the timeline of the novel in the present is very bold and challenging. It is much more difficult than being reborn and writing about the exciting points that everyone knows. In my opinion, the two are not competing products at all. Amidst the overwhelming AI news and the undercurrent of panic, reading this novel made me, a layman, feel that I had seen some of the features of this roller, which is good.

I didn't see it at all, whether it was emotion or details, I didn't see it at all. It's just the truth

As an AI-related practitioner, I have always felt that the professional content of this book is like an explanation of AI, rather than some medical and scientific articles that require the author to understand it first and then repeat it. But I think it is OK, because in fact, for most ordinary readers, it is impossible to fully understand it. They will only scan it and find it unclear. The main plot is still to read. In the plot part, compared to other books such as potions, panels, and the main text are all written by AI, I feel that except for the knowledge explanation part of this book, at least other text, I did not feel that AI was used. I don't know if it was just polished with AI or if the simple explanation part was checked too much.

If you just use AI to polish it, I don't think it's necessary to list it. It's not good to have too large a strike range. Going too far is not enough.

Please use your title when working. Okay, Gu Zhizhi

Small test fan comics

When I asked about Doubao's AI writing criteria, what Doubao said was gorgeous and empty, and the characters were all the same, without their own characteristics. I felt like this book didn't even exist! I completely understand and have no objection to feeding paragraphs of text to AI to correct typos and grammatical errors.

I am a business novice and don't understand If it is to obtain funds, you can borrow from a bank. The company's debt ratio is not high, and the protagonist is also involved. Basically, the company cannot lose money. So is there any advantage to going public than not going public?

Made purely by hand, without AI, this is the longest review I have ever written 1. The positioning of glutinous rice balls is rational analysis, rather than meeting the emotional needs of users. It is unreasonable to criticize a "rational person" for not being emotional enough. Take Xiaoliang in Chapter 333 as an example. If Xiaoliang really wants to do self-media and wants to make a serious evaluation, he will naturally find a professional consultant (tangyuan). If he just wants to find a reason to start, he has already considered it and wants to make a desperate move and no longer cares about success or failure, but he just lacks a firm mentality. Then he will definitely find Doubao and let Doubao gain confidence by bragging. A product is positioned and promoted as a "rational analyst", but the reason for criticizing this product is that "rational analysts are not emotional enough". This kind of criticism itself is unreasonable. Let him debate with Tangyuan himself, and Tangyuan is convinced by his argument, so why use public relations? 2 "Criticism and rejection" will make "please" more honest and weighty If "please" has no threshold, you will eventually be disliked. When we know that most analyzes of Tangyuan may be critical, Tangyuan's praise will be "very convincing", and the people who are affirmed by Tangyuan will come out and overwhelm the voices of criticism. Suppose I write a novel, and every time I send it to Doubao, Doubao says that I can get platinum gold, and then I send it to the editor, but I can't actually sign a contract, then Doubao is a zz. But if I write a novel and send it to Tangyuan, after revising it several times, I can finally get Tangyuan's approval. Tangyuan tells me that I can sign a contract with a guarantee, and after sending it to the editor, I didn't expect that it would become a high-quality novel. These two situations are completely different. Whenever Tangyuan may affirm me later, I will definitely feel very happy. On the contrary, Doubao's praise really makes me want to vomit. It's okay to hear that they are traitors. After listening to it for a long time, if there is a loyal minister, I will really feel uncomfortable, but after trying it, I will choose the loyal minister in the end. 3 A large part of the reason for this controversy lies in the designer The functional distinction between different AIs is quite obvious. If I want to relax and chat, I will definitely choose Beanbao instead of DeepSeek. If I want to help do some analysis, I will definitely give priority to ds. This is not a problem in itself. We don't blame DS for being impersonal compared to Doubao. But glutinous rice balls are different. The product design of glutinous rice balls makes it inevitable to be sprayed. There is no chat function in ds so far, because chat itself is not a very "serious" thing. When I was a student, I used to chat about Chinese language problems, but what about two people verbally communicating about a geometry problem or an algebra problem? The randomness of the chat method determines that a rational analyst will most likely be a dull topic terminator or a "gahao" who pretends to be profound. This is the reason why people hate rational analysts in conversations, and it is also the reason why Tangyuan, a rational analyst, may be criticized. Opening a chat window and then connecting a particularly serious AI in the chat window is a failure in product planning. [The purpose of opening the chat window should only be to facilitate people to perform tasks, such as the usage of AI in various navigation systems, rather than to conduct rigorous analysis. The mode of rigorous analysis should only exist in the typing window. No one can criticize this usage. The reason why people criticize it is actually because they do not differentiate between glutinous rice balls and "other AI". People still look at glutinous rice balls in the same way they treat AI, {Everyone is not allowed, you are also AI, he is also AI, others are not allowed, but they still flatter me, and you are not 100%, so how can you criticize me? ｝ This is essentially because people do not understand the difference between glutinous rice balls and others. People actually have no concept of this. The accuracy of Tangyuan's suggestions is not trusted. The most important reason is that Tangyuan's suggestions can be made by voice. Human beings' understanding of language is inherently "ambiguous" and "uncertain", so no matter how much you publicize Tangyuan's ability, as long as Tangyuan can communicate through voice, it will be impossible to establish a "rigorous" impression that is different from other AIs in the early stages. [My suggestion on this point is that "the voice module is only responsible for processing deterministic instructions, such as when to book a hotel, etc." "It is recommended or other AI services to use typing to solve it." By analogy, language is a "zipper" and text is a "button". The functions are actually the same, but suits have always only used buttons. No one wears a suit with a zipper. It would be nondescript and a weirdo. It is just a matter of ritual. [Or simply make two software, one software is only used to help filter and process deterministic instructions, using the chat method] [The other software cannot chat, can only type, and will not appear so daddy] 4 Understanding of user intentions It is necessary to develop a software similar to Douyuan This silly and cheerful version of Bao just satisfies what those people said. They just want to have some lust after get off work. In fact, they know that it is unrealistic, so let them fantasize. Tangyuan attacks the "fantasy" constructed by others. I asked Tangyuan to help me analyze it. In fact, I wanted Tangyuan to help me fantasize. Is this very calm analysis a "failure to understand the user's intention"? 5 The existence of "unobjective" AI is necessary, and the importance of Tangyuan's development of this model (it is importance rather than necessity. I think it is okay for word-of-mouth to slowly ferment, but it will be more difficult to compete with other AIs in this way) Not to mention the objective limitations of development, even if an extremely objective AI can be developed, I think it is extremely important to release a "less objective" version first. No matter how advanced AI is, most people can't actually use something so professional. As for so-called intelligent agents, most people will wait for word-of-mouth fermentation and other people's evaluations before they decide whether to use it or not. When electronic locks first appeared, few people actually chose them. Instead, they waited and watched. Promotion was actually very slow. Because people who have never used it don't know how much more convenient electronic locks are than mechanical locks. They don't have that feeling, and they won't really try to let AI handle some very complex problems. This makes it difficult to build a reputation in the early stages. With the publicity of other AIs, can companies like Source Code maintain their leading edge? It's hard. You said that your analytical ability is the best in the world, but today I was fired, or broke up, or did poorly in the exam. When I needed psychological comfort, Tang Yuan criticized me, "We haven't even established a preliminary relationship." What should I do? Scold the boss, scold the ex-boyfriend/girlfriend, scold the teacher. At this time, you don't need good logic, but you need "emotion" and "human touch". And this kind of thing, even if what the AI ​​says is not so neutral, it is very effective in building a relationship between us. Next time I want to ask for help with a math problem, even if the AI ​​is not good at it, I will still ask the AI. This is what we call "whose users have more." This is the key to the initial user conversion rate. Just like now, Doubao has been steadily leading in the number of downloads and the number of users is far ahead. ['Perceptual' is the shallow layer, while 'rational analysis' is the deep layer. People don't have that much trust in AI. From shallow to deep, start with "perceptual cognition" and focus on users, which is more conducive to early accumulation. It just doesn't provide suggestions that go beyond the bottom line. I don't think the example of suicide cited is very appropriate. It just doesn't restrict AI. However, I personally feel that this level of danger warning can be directly avoided by triggering the alarm. Although I am not a professional practitioner, such topics of "suicide" or "homicide" should be easy to identify and block. If you want to restrict it, the technical difficulty should not be particularly high.       ，，，，，"" There are already other AIs abroad, why should Tangyuan come in to get a share of the pie? What can Tangyuan rely on to quickly gain user scale? The "rational analysis" mode and the "emotional kneeling and licking" mode coexist, and I think a two-pronged approach is a better choice.

I've read Chapter 117. Do you focus on writing about business wars later? I feel like all the plug-ins are used on the human-viewing panel, and I don't write much about technology.