Simultaneous Transmigration: Merging Worldviews

It's quite novel. It's not the common sharing of cultivation or talent, but the mechanism of sharing each other's world. The best thing is that the mechanism is only useful around the protagonist. The protagonist can pass the mechanism to his friends as he wishes. I won't say that once the protagonists merge inexplicably, and then the whole world shares it to the extreme, it would be really difficult to fight in that case.

The setting of this book is a bit new. It is different from the traditional Tongchuanliu. The setting of this book is that every time a protagonist is added to the world, the settings of the other protagonists' worlds will be upgraded. For example, there are 00 more Ouchi secret agents, a new lightning strike and internal force setting; there are more Douluo, JoJo's stand-in can add soul rings... And the protagonists are always ahead by virtue of the preview of the version, this idea is OK, and I look forward to the follow-up story

How can I write about a protagonist who would fight for someone else after just a few days of friendship? If there is no benefit to saving people, just take risks, just like a deadpool.

The biggest problem with the same time travel is that there are multiple protagonists, and each world is a different protagonist, which makes the sense of substitution extremely poor. There's no main plot and no real protagonist, it's all, a little bit here, a little bit there. Then gave up. I hope the author doesn't follow the same old path. . . .

The setting and the imagination are very interesting, but I still slipped away. The writing is good, but it is incoherent. The world jumps here and there. When I see the excitement, I jump away. It is like watching the Divine Eagle to destroy the Meng Yuan Dynasty and prepare to go south to destroy the Song Dynasty and become the emperor. However, he jumped to the world. He is really prone to internal injuries, so he slipped away. Many times. Xiao Li's flying knife is also the same. It's a great killing. Jumping around the world, I can't stand it anymore

I laughed so hard, I was so entangled, so pitiful

I collected Lin Xianer when I was not here, so I had to collect it when my shoes were broken.

To be honest, the author had a problem with the outline from the beginning. Why did Jojo change it to Ruthless Swordsman halfway through writing? What does the previous paragraph mean? The writing of The Ruthless Swordsman is also a bit shaky and too discouraging. If you feel it's hard to survive, you can read Huang Tian's book. Might as well be designed like that

The setting is relatively novel. The author likes to write weak words, such as the description of weak characters. The descriptions of Hong Lingbo and the two little girls are too weak, and there are also problems with the description of the protagonist's perspective. It is the right time to cut off one interesting point. I deeply doubt that the author will think that we readers want to read the subsequent interesting points and follow his books.

The creative writing is very good, but the writing method is wrong. The audience attracted by the shared worldview wants to see the performance of different systems in a misaligned world. Otherwise, it's just a fantastic use of animation abilities in a misplaced world. The beginning is well written and has a good look and feel, but what about after ten chapters? What did you write? Selling dog meat on a sheep's head, JOJO barely passes the test, what the hell is Cologne? If you want to see the grudges and grievances, the outbreak of violence, and the saintly appearance in front of people, will you read the beginning of you? Besides, this paragraph was not written well. The purest thing is that the addition of Stephen Chow's worldview in the movie directly improves the protagonist's combat power system. Directly leading to the most core setting, a shared worldview is more numerically inflated than shared power. Moreover, the core setting also causes the improvement of the protagonist to be continuously diluted by the things in the world (after all, by the middle stage of writing, you will have at least a dozen systems, as well as the funny movie type system at the top of the contempt chain). I can't even understand what I wrote in the article. Can I understand the numerical value when I write it?