
Traveler Civilization
旅行者文明
- Status
- Ongoing
- Length
- 1.2M Words
- Genre
- Sci-Fi
- Audience
- Male
- Subgenre
- Ancient Martial Mecha
- Updated
- 2d ago
- Source
- Qidian
Stats
0Monthly votes
103Recommends
0Fans
162Chapters
Synopsis
Reader comments
Readers also read
Oh Yeah! I've Seen Fake People
Doomsday Convoy: I Can Extract Unlimited Entries
My Low-Dimensional Universe Model
Psychic Worlds: the Paladin Forges His Body into a Numerical Monster
Warhammer: in the Name of Nirvana
1982: from Nightclub to Business Legend
Warhammer: What? Are the Female Primarchs Coming True?
Alien Hotel
Fusion Is the Most Noble Way of Summoning!
The Peak Crazy Young Man in Huadu
If You Hit a Ghost, You'll Be Awesome
Ancient Demon Emperor Zun
"The history of the science fiction world combines the key scientific theories of martial arts for the first time" in "Traveler Civilization" is really a great idea! Hard science fiction combines numbers and shapes with high logic, is interesting, and has a loving encouragement to social life! Very innovative! The so-called meaning of scientific and technological innovation should not be the pursuit of absolute accuracy, but rather the use of knowledge to create as much as possible {"Url":"https://qdreaderpic-1252317822. File. Myqcloud. Com/29 088756/d0d23f83703a4cc7847f5c271698b99b_original. Jpg","Width":"1080","Height":"2400"} Is it possible? We must be prepared for danger in times of peace and hope to spread technological innovation and martial arts. Explaining the operating principle of Tai Chi with this technology can give many people hope for life: Hot comment from the last talk: Real martial arts is the ability to directionally mobilize electrons in the body. And Tai Chi, which can truly stimulate the Lorentz force, can also definitely cure terminal illnesses, that is, it can specifically rejuvenate and purify one's own Lorentz force system. Because the real old man who can fight in history is the martial arts master Zhang Sanfeng. His Tai Chi Pure Yang Wuji Kung Fu is derived from the Nine Yang Manual. The Nine Yang Divine Kung Fu can restore and purify the internal energy system. As for whether the Lorentz force can be stimulated, it depends on whether the data shown in the statistical analysis of the data system of the super-energy pulse table produced after 2035 by the 2023 Physics Nobel Prize attosecond light pulse (the process of measuring electron movement and energy conversion with extremely short light pulses) technology meets the standards. Ordinary people still have to control human body electronics through the Riemannian subtle technology system of the watch. Don't just consider the "perpendicular problem" between the direction of the Lorentz force and the direction of the charge. The key point is the partial acceleration, variable acceleration, and overlapping magnetic field produced by the Lorentz force generated by the orientation v. That is, if A (the original new partial velocity) is substituted into the second new magnetic field under consideration, A will be consistent with the first new magnetic field. The direction of the Lorentz force generated by the original velocity coincides with the original velocity (also A) of the second new magnetic field, which is perpendicular to the direction of the Lorentz force generated in the second magnetic field. It will do negative work to generate energy. To reiterate: the generation of the Lorentz force will generate downward (in the figure) acceleration, thus generating a downward component velocity. No work is ever done because the particle motion is irregular and directional, not because the Lorentz force is perpendicular to the direction of the particle motion. The Lorentz force generated by regular changes can also produce acceleration, thereby generating new partial velocities and doing work. The electrons are negatively charged, which is negative work. The size of F Luo is according to the formula F Luo = qv electric b. V electricity itself is close to c light speed. First, move diagonally downward to the lower right corner of the figure. After 1 to 2 seconds, the downward component velocity of the electron will exceed the initial velocity to the right and continue to increase. Therefore, in these processes, Riemannian microtechnology needs to position the redirected electrons and control the variable movement directions of high-speed electrons. The Riemann Hypothesis can derive the prime number law☆, thus reversing all the repeatability laws☆. Infinitely improve accuracy☆.
Technological innovation theory explains the world of martial arts - Tai Chi
"For the first time in the history of the science fiction world, the key scientific theories of martial arts are combined" We must be prepared for danger in times of peace and hope to spread scientific and technological innovation in martial arts. Explaining the operating principle of Tai Chi with this technology can give many people hope for life: Hot comment from the last talk: Real martial arts is the ability to directionally mobilize electrons in the body. And Tai Chi, which can truly stimulate the Lorentz force, can also definitely cure terminal illnesses, that is, it can specifically rejuvenate and purify one's own Lorentz force system. Because the real old man who can fight in history is the martial arts master Zhang Sanfeng. His Tai Chi Pure Yang Wuji Kung Fu is derived from the Nine Yang Manual. The Nine Yang Divine Kung Fu can restore and purify the internal energy system. As for whether the Lorentz force can be stimulated, it depends on whether the data shown in the statistical analysis of the data system of the super-energy pulse table produced after 2035 by the 2023 Physics Nobel Prize attosecond light pulse (the process of measuring electron movement and energy conversion with extremely short light pulses) technology meets the standards. Ordinary people still have to control human body electronics through the Riemannian subtle technology system of the watch. Don't just consider the "perpendicular problem" between the direction of the Lorentz force and the direction of the charge. The key point is the partial acceleration, variable acceleration, and overlapping magnetic field produced by the Lorentz force generated by the orientation v. That is, if A (the original new partial velocity) is substituted into the second new magnetic field under consideration, A will be the same as the original new magnetic field of the first new magnetic field. The direction of the Lorentz force generated by the velocity coincides with that of the original velocity (also A) of the second new magnetic field, which is perpendicular to the direction of the Lorentz force generated in the second magnetic field. It will do negative work to generate energy. Reiterating: The generation of the Lorentz force will generate downward acceleration (in the figure), thus generating a downward component velocity. No work is ever done because the particle motion is irregular and directional, not because the Lorentz force is perpendicular to the direction of the particle motion. The Lorentz force generated by regular changes can also produce acceleration, thereby generating new partial velocities and doing work. The electrons are negatively charged, which is negative work. The size of F Luo is according to the formula F Luo = qv electric b. V electricity itself is close to c light speed. First, move diagonally downward to the lower right corner of the figure. After 1 to 2 seconds, the downward component velocity of the electron will exceed the initial velocity to the right and continue to increase. Therefore, in these processes, Riemannian microtechnology needs to position the redirected electrons and control the variable movement directions of high-speed electrons. The Riemann Hypothesis can derive the prime number law☆, thus reversing all the repeatability laws☆. Infinitely improve accuracy☆.
Chapter 11 is a good introduction to falsifying "Pi does not exist" and proving "Pi exists".
"On proving why a particular small algorithm by a known scientist challenging pi cannot become a proper subset of another complete large algorithm that can be used today to find pi using composite functions?" ", Signed "Lin Xijia swing in the past". At that time, mankind's calculation of pi had exceeded one quadrillion digits, but it was still trapped in the iron cage of "infinite non-circulation". Under Li Changan's news, messages from "Zi Yan" (the anonymous ID shared by Lin Xi and Swing) were like a string of encrypted codes, popping up intensively in the half hour after 20:52, cutting through the layers of a mathematical logic that subverts cognition. "If computers all over the world do not have algorithms for solving the laws of composite functions, it is normal that π cannot be found. The deterministic existence of the standard sphere within the large space lock itself shows that it has laws - Lin Xi + 1." This sentence is like a stone dropped into the calm academic pool: The "high-precision π" that humans have spent their computing power building up is just spinning around the "deterministic existence" of the standard sphere, but it has never touched its core algorithmic laws. Immediately afterwards, "Zi Yan" made a sharper conclusion: "It also shows that π is actually a rational number - a swing." In order to make this counter-intuitive conclusion come true, "Ziyan" used the simplest number game to build a logical framework: - ① Original algorithm: 9+16=25 - ② Small algorithm: disassembled into (1) 4+5 = 9, (2) 9+7=16, and then add the two through (3) to get 25 - ③ Big algorithm: directly use (5 squared) = 25 "①② is related, ①② has nothing to do with ③" - this line of words is like a gap, completely separating the "small algorithm" from the "big algorithm". "Zi Yan" further explained: (1) (2) of the small algorithm are the "proper subsets" of the original algorithm ①, but have "no intersection" with the big algorithm ③. Just like the π calculated by humans using thousands of small algorithms (splitting, approximation, iteration), they are just fragments of the "original algorithm" (the deterministic existence of the circle), while the "big algorithm" that can truly define π completely is another completely independent logic - it does not require splitting, but directly points to the essential law of the circle. "The intersection of numbers does not mean the intersection of algorithms." This sentence is the highlight of the entire argument: the result (number) of 25 can be obtained through different algorithms, but the "splitting logic" of the small algorithm and the "essential logic" of the large algorithm are two paths that will never intersect. Corresponding to pi: The "high-precision π value" calculated by humans using small algorithms and the "rational number π" pointed to by large algorithms may partially overlap, but the barriers of algorithm logic prevent the former from becoming a "proper subset" of the latter. This is why scientists who challenge pi have exhausted small algorithms, but they have never been able to touch the true form of π. At the end of the post, "Zi Yan" left a meaningful sentence: "So, please all the scientists who failed to challenge pi are just following the path of big algorithm ①, and there are big algorithms ③ that I won't tell you now." There is a youthful cunningness in his tone, but there is an edge to pierce authority - just like humans at the beginning of the 21st century, who thought that billions of computers could crack the mystery of π, but did not know that they had not even touched the door to the correct algorithm. Under this update, Li Changan's post seemed to be a tacit response. He repeated the example of "Small Algorithm Dismantling 25", as if he was handing a decoding key to fellow travelers on the dark web. And "Zi Yan"'s phrase "Never lose hope in something you once loved" adds a touch of warmth to this cold mathematical argument - what they challenge is not only the algorithm of π, but also the cognitive boundaries of human beings' "existence": Those seemingly unsolvable puzzles may just be because we use the wrong logic. At this moment, Feng Jiangyu, who was far away at the National Space Administration, stared at this old news from 2025, and ran his fingertips across the composite function graph on the virtual light screen. He suddenly understood that Lin Xi (Swing) had laid the groundwork as early as 2025: the "5²" corresponding to the big algorithm ③ was the prototype of the energy equation of the standard sphere core reactor - while humans were still spinning in the maze of small algorithms, someone had already stood on the top of the algorithm and saw the truth of π as a rational number. This paper, regarded as "heretical" by the scientific community, overturns hundreds of years of human cognition at the beginning: "Even if a small algorithm calculates a correct approximation, the result of a large algorithm may be completely different!" In the text, Swing revised the abstract "big algorithm ③" in the original paper to "the square of 5", using the most concise expression to open up the gap in authoritative assertions. Feng Jiangyu studied word for word, and his fingertips ran across the formulas that seemed simple but hid mysteries. He suddenly remembered what Lin Xi once said: "Simplification is the beauty of mathematical problems and solutions. Only a freshman in high school can understand it, and that is the true transparency." Thesis The core proof by contradiction goes straight to the point: "Pi is derived from the area of a circle. If you change it slightly, the entire circle will change!" Swing gives an example in the article. If the area of a fixed circle is an established fact, then the key factors that constitute the area - radius and pi, should be equally certain. "It is a fact that area is fixed, and so should its required factors be fixed! Pi cannot be an exception." This paragraph is marked with a striking red underline, as if it is declaring war on the entire scientific community. Feng Jiangyu retrieved the pi research files from the early 21st century. Human beings have spent computing power to make pi accurate to more than one trillion digits, but they have never been able to get rid of the shackles of infinite non-cyclicity. Therefore, the authoritative conclusion emerged: pi is an irrational number. But Shuqian sharply refuted it in the paper: "The authoritative scientific community today asserts that scientists who failed to challenge pi in the past used countless correct small algorithms to obtain infinity of π, that is, they directly deduced that π is an irrational number. This assertion is wrong!"