I Really Didn't Let the Villain Enlighten the World.

Foreword In an era where ideas are promoted, people are always eccentric and energetic. People will always seek explained answers to what they want to know. The fierce conflict between doctrine, conjecture and reality breeds the germination of cross-era ideas. Reading Thoughts This is the tone of the text that I feel when I read Chapter 50 of the book. Up to now, the plot in the article is like slowly unfolding the scroll. The rhythm is quite good. In the peace, I can feel a trace of the pioneers in action in an era that cannot be described. Maybe I have not seen works with similar themes. This is different from heroic epics. It parted the Red Sea in front of Moses, which symbolized the story of kings and emperors, and opened up a unique path for people's ideological enlightenment and recording. This new The strange feeling is quite good. The last time I had this feeling was when I read about the space race information and the records of the Crazy Century. The unique farsightedness and ideological collision in the cold era made people shudder, but it still fascinated me when I was a student. I sincerely hope that the author can capture more of the pioneer epic feeling and bring more silent thunder. Good varieties of grapes and skilled craftsmen will definitely produce mellow and delicious wine, right? Finally recorded some thoughts Religion has always been a part of culture and art, and it is also one of the cornerstones of progress. People will never pray to the faith they identify with just once, and people will never look up at the stars just once. People will grow old, and people will die, but the world will always get younger. Readers here also sincerely hope that the author can persist in writing until the golden age when ideals are everywhere and the world gradually enters, and let technology declare that when the world is young, long live ideals! One reader or more

The best thing about this book is that the characters are very three-dimensional, which is completely different from the mainstream descriptions that label characters to save trouble. Although the protagonist is behind the scenes, he is very humane, and the dialogue with the people who support him is humane. Not for the sake of pure pretense and hard deception. I also like the inner changes and conflicts of the characters very much. Also, I must praise the author for not specifically looking for a bunch of women to support him. I came here to see the career, not the awkward emotional drama. Spoiler Warning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . The conflict between the first person's ideal and reality is quite good. It is also reasonable that the protagonist's lack of insight into people's hearts and overconfidence in himself leads to tragedy. But I can't accept that the beast is inexplicably ineffective, and then the character quickly dies for his ideals. It feels too deliberate. Author, you'd better have some foreshadowing and explain the reason for the failure later. Otherwise I will be angry at you😡 I like the second person's exploration of the possibility of human nature very much, but I feel like it's all a lie. I really hate the trend of stigmatization and whitewashing. A person's heart is complex and will change. The growth and transformation of the characters in the story are necessary. I really don't like the character-changing descriptions that don't allow for labeling. Most of the villains have tragic pasts. Whether they were touched and changed later, or they are still stubborn. As long as the character's psychology is clearly written and the motivation is reasonable.  …but I am actually a little worried about this book. I am afraid that the protagonist will get out of trouble soon and start messing around on his own. I feel that the unblocking progress is very fast. To be honest, isn't behind-the-scenes writing just about looking behind the scenes? Once I'm out of trouble I don't want to watch anymore. Every time I see the main character in front of the stage, I run away.

The writing is quite good, but for me, the death of the first character did not reveal the emotion of the whole thing. I just felt like an insignificant person died, and there was too little content behind it, so I had no idea to continue following it.

I only watched the first character die and then stopped watching. Simply say how you feel. ①The first character died very ridiculously. A child, whose research has not reached the bottleneck and can continue research for decades or nearly a hundred years, then says that he can't do it, dies with a heliocentric theory that is not correct, and passes his hope to future generations to continue. Don't understand the author's idea. Why does a genius believe that there will be someone smarter than him in the future who can solve problems that he cannot solve? ② Did the death of the first character cause any sensation? What kind of big shot is he? What kind of influential person is he? Is the heliocentric theory that he finally wrote out perfect? Has it been published? What he said was to allow more people to study the truth and accept death calmly, did he do it? To fight, to publish, to practice your own theories, and fall down on the road for this, I understand. But what the author wrote is very childish. ③Why didn't the beast appear? Why did the author suppress this force and come out? If you don't write it, I won't be surprised. If you write it but don't use it, it will become a loophole. ④The church has mastered the beast, so why can't the nobles, kings and armies master the power of the beast? The world created by the author is not very reasonable, at least not in the first chapter, which is unreasonable. ⑤ You can become stronger by enlightening a stone, denying God, and finally turning yourself into a god. It's so strange. Why can you become stronger by enlightening a human being? There are often this kind of systematic novels, which follow this routine, but what the author writes is not like this. I can't understand the inevitable connection between the two. ⑥The first character encounters a bottleneck, but Shitou refuses to tell more truths about the universe. Why? What I want to ask is, there are theoretical physicists and experimental physicists in reality. Has the theory of relativity been completely confirmed? Has quantum mechanics been proven? Physics is developing vigorously, making bold assumptions and careful demonstrations, but the author insists on assigning the first character to be an experimentalist. If Shitou talks more, will it affect his research? It shouldn't have any impact, just like Fermat's last theorem was just a theory proposed at the beginning, but it will affect the author's rhythm of writing this book. Because the author wants to enlighten him step by step according to the process of human history. But the overall feeling is still too rough. I have only seen the first character, so I only have some superficial opinions. People who have seen more of the following characters can comment on the unreasonable aspects of what I said.

Regarding certain issues and settings in this book, I think it is necessary to explain it to the readers here. 1. Power system. This book does not have a strict upgrade system, and is more biased towards low-level magic and medium-level magic. Therefore, it basically does not describe too much about the events that increase the character's combat power. As the title of the book says, this is a story focused on 'enlightenment'. 2. Time span. The time span of this book will change greatly. Due to my writing skills, I even directly took the outline in many places. In one sentence, several months may have passed. Please forgive me. 3. Possibly misleading label: behind-the-scenes flow. Strictly speaking, this book is not a behind-the-scenes story. The protagonist does not have the ability to dominate or organize the world. He is also an individual with a clear purpose from beginning to end. 4. Some errors that may occur: I am not a professional. There may be fallacies in the description of enlightenment in the book. If readers find it, please point it out and I will correct it and mark it immediately. 5. Plot: Those who cannot accept the death of supporting characters can leave. Not everyone will die, but there will always be some sacrifices. ... Also, catching up on reading on Tuesday... Is considered a relatively important thing, right?

Genius + future pope + super ability He died within a year. It would be better to let him rise to a high position first and then cause trouble.

If there is such a power as the beast, the nobles and the church will first fight for this power, and they will not be as harmonious as you wrote

It's so sloppy, let's just give him a three-week movie. The golden finger of the second-week movie's protagonist does nothing but give clues, and in the end he still hasn't persuaded people to come back.

Interesting setting and concept, but I feel it would be more difficult to write

The creativity and writing are pretty good, but it would be better if the storyline had some ups and downs. After reading the current chapter, I feel that the plot has relatively few ups and downs. It is easy to get carried away by writing a web article like this, even if you are very creative. . . The most criticized thing is that the first "protagonist" was rushed offline. I recommend that the author adjust the story structure to three acts. Once the structure is adjusted, the future is promising.

It doesn't look good, and there's nothing interesting about it. Disharmonious

The protagonist is like a protector, guiding earth civilization towards the stars. And the protagonist also undergoes a transformation in the process, becoming a god who controls the rules of physics.

Please change your name and introduction when you have time. The title doesn't match.

Let me guess, this Vivas is not the Lord Cow of this world, right?

Don't cut it 😭😭😭 Common books look boring This is the only thing that can put me in the mood to read Can I give you my monthly ticket? 😭

He should have done more

Food and grass, but I think the length of the first character is a bit too short, and the entire description is also a bit weak. The author can refer to "Who Stole My Body" more. It is difficult to stand up for a main character with only twenty or thirty chapters.

I'll take a sip of milk. It will be amazing to finish this book. No one saw this at first. The author is steady and will finish the book with perfection.

There are too many dyslexias. Normal people won't have the patience to continue reading once the nouns and settings are introduced.

Surprisingly, this quality can still maintain around 5,000 updates per day There are rare high-quality works that can be read word by word and sentence by sentence.

The author must keep writing.

A very good novel with a very novel subject matter

Stupid is the most annoying thing. . This word "Yade" perfectly fits the word

This novel is not bold enough, it is too conventional

Am I the only one who put this book on the bookshelf because of the author's avatar? ()