Liu Bei: Great Ancestor, Please Bless Us!

It's really a great experience. I found that some people think that Liu Bang is inferior to Liu Bei and Cao Cao. I can only say that the historical blind identification device is well-deserved.,,, Some people may think that Liu Bang unified the world in seven years, and the three heroes in the early Han Dynasty were super capable, and the unification of the world was a bit smooth, not as exciting as the ups and downs of the Three Kingdoms story.

When it comes to dealing with people, Brother Bangzi is the ceiling🤭🤭

It was a bit too fun to advocate Lu Zheng at the beginning and give all the blame to Hu Hai. The whole country turned against him within half a year of taking the throne. Hu Hai couldn't bear the blame. Did Liu Bang go to Lu Zheng before he died and gave the blame to Hu Hai? Interesting

No, author, how did you come up with the idea of ​​writing a novel about Liu Bang commanding Liu Bei in an earlier period? Cavalry tactics were matured during the Han Dynasty, and people cannot transcend the times. Although Liu Bei saw that Liu Bang was quite effective, I really don't think it will have much effect. After all, Liu Bang focuses on employing people, but the problem is that Liu Bei is also very good at recognizing and employing people. Liu Bang can win people's hearts, and Liu Bei is also good at it. These two abilities completely overlap. At most, one is strengthened and the other is weakened. Assisting Liu Bei in other novels is actually about the time traveler helping Liu Bei to change the fate of Wuhuanhua! But Liu Bang, as an ancient, did not have this awareness. In other words, whether Liu Bei lost or won, what was the point? It's just replacing Wei with Shu, and Liu Bang can only play a starting role in the military, which is too limited. The author's description of Liu Bang is quite interesting, but Liu Bei is almost uninteresting. Their rival scenes lack tension, and Liu Bei is quite boring. In fact, this idea is quite interesting. I think if it were changed to Zhuge Liang seeing Liu Bang, or Cao Cao seeing Liu Bang, it would be more interesting than Liu Bei seeing Liu Bang. For example, Liu Bang instructs Zhuge Liang to find dogs and women for him. How will Liangzi maintain his character? Liu Bang teasing Zhuge Liang will definitely be more interesting than teasing Liu Bei. Another example is Cao Cao stealing a widow, and Liu Bang is commenting on it, is it fun? Another example is Cao Cao compiling the Han in front of Liu Bang, would he feel guilty? Secondly, Liu Bang did not have much pursuit of power, and his desire to restore Han Dynasty was too weak. But if Liu Bang was changed to Liu Che, Liu Che, a creature of power who frequently kills people, would be full of conflict with Liu Bei's benevolence and righteousness. The relationship between Liu Bang and Liu Bei's ancestors and their descendants didn't even have the opportunity for conflicts, so how could it be written in a long way? Also, the beginning is too poisonous. Don't write about how many people have died. If you don't know how to write, just skip it. Don't be a literary person, let's be straightforward. The people in the city heard that Cao Cao threatened to massacre the city and asked Liu Bei to take them with him. Liu Bei couldn't bear to abandon them. In order to protect the people, he was overtaken by Cao's soldiers and eventually lost his troops. It's as simple as that. Don't make the logical relationship too complicated, keep it as simple as possible.

This comment section is so terrible. The old hooligans are not very powerful. Is Emperor Hanwen even more rubbish? 🤓

In history, those who can mount battles on their own and unify the world to achieve great unification are not outstanding people. Even if Cao Cao had 7 mines in the Three Kingdoms era, he still did not complete unification.

Seeing Ye Xian, Liu Bei and Liu Bang talking a lot about each other, and discussing whose fault it was to massacre the city, and Yu Yunuonuo saying something shouldn't be like this, the taste of moralist self-promotion almost overflowed, it was simply disgusting, benevolence and righteousness and morality in the modern sense are completely different things, the Liu Bei in the author's book should be in the Animal Protection Association.

Liu Bang is not good at internal affairs, but he is good at employing people and thieves. His battle performance is average, but he is strong in strategy. He can lose dozens of games without breaking his bones. His personal ethics are lacking, but he is always clear-headed in the face of big rights and wrongs. He is a very awesome person. It really conforms to the meaning of Tao, the great sound and the sound. He seems to be ordinary, but he gets things done quietly. He can occupy a high position or crawl at the bottom. No matter where he is placed, he can sit still. When talking about the conflict between Chu and Han, the first thing that everyone thinks of is Xiang Yu. Xiang Yu is very famous, but the winner Liu Bang is very low-key, and even has a low reputation. Logically speaking, history books are written by the winners, and Liu Bang's reputation is not as good as that of a loser, which is abnormal. The reason is very simple, that is, Liu Bang is bragging about Xiang Yu, and Xiang Yu is a generation of heroes. It is a pity here, but a pity there. When it comes to himself, he is like a cockfighting in the village pissing into other people's hats, but anyone who knows a little bit about history knows what Xiang Yu is. Slaughter the city, kill and surrender, kill the emperor himself, who is headstrong and does not listen to others, and is despicable, shameless and indecisive. Let's take some of the more famous things as an example: threatening Liu Bang with his parents. Isn't this a villainous act? Liu Bang became a villain instead of being threatened. Is it true that threatening others with their families is what a hero does? Really weird. It was clearly agreed that he would enter the Hanzhong King first, but what was the result? Liu Bang advanced, but Xiang Yu was unhappy. Needless to say, the process in the process ended up being that Xiang Yu took a good place and left Liu Bang in a remote area. Setting up a banquet at Hongmen and planning a sneak attack is an act of a villain. Although I gave up on my own initiative, I wanted to do something bad to you and regretted it halfway. Do you still have to thank me? This is outrageous. Looking at various events, people say that Liu Bang is a villain and Xiang Yu is a hero. I really don't understand it. Anyone who has a sense of right and wrong will know who is right and who is wrong. It can be said that Liu Bang is underestimated by many people.

All the advantages of Cao Cao, Liu Bei, Sun Quan, Yuan Shao, and Yuan Shu are combined into one character. The panel is not as good as Liu Bang.

Brother, just say a few words. Who knows if the late emperor can hear it?