Exorcist Priest, Your Tentacles Are Showing

It can be said that the polishing of the plot and character design can be seen with great care, but unfortunately the control of the fun points and plot development is not good. At present, the overall plot is developing steadily in a somewhat depressing direction. As a result, the writing mode of using the protagonist's perspective to unfold the plot will not give people a particularly good reading experience for the time being. My suggestion is to try to determine the overall plot context and figure out what role the filler subplots should play in the overall plot. If a book wants to give readers a good reading experience, it must at least have some ups and downs in the plot, rather than arranging a depressing plot all at once, and deliberately creating the biggest explosive and exciting point. Of course, this is just a suggestion based on my own reading experience. It would be best for new authors to stick to their own ideas and then summarize after they have achieved results.

Edward Byrne, alchemist and bearer of the stigmata.

Thank you all book friends for your collection, reading, comments, recommendation votes, rewards and monthly votes. In the name of the seven archangels, I wish to express my most sincere gratitude. 😍😍😍

Father Anderson, reminds me of the one from Hell Song.

The author will insert pictures into the text from time to time, or publish character concept drawings in the comment area to give book lovers a better reading experience. Note that the pictures are for reference only, the actual content is mainly text, thank you for your support! Finally, I beg you all to continue reading, please!

Moran Anderson, the young priest of Sainte-Chapelle, the tentacle-parasitic exorcist, the breeder of the children of hell

I feel like the plot is a bit depressing, and the protagonist's hard power doesn't increase much.

Faz, the vain duke from hell

Evelyn Drake, half-blood, exorcist

The classic misunderstanding is that the Hebrew word helel means morning star, which is not the name of an angel at all. Lucifer is the Latin transliteration of Jerome, lux (light) + ferre (bring), the thing that brings light. Even Jesus was called Lucifer The meaningful affix is ​​not fel but el, ~ God's, Hebrew, michael = mi (who) + cha (such) + el (god) = Michael - who is like God? -Godlike person, raphael=rafa (healing)+el (god's)=god's healing=healing angel, Israel=yisra (wrestling/fighting/ruling)+el (god)=a place to fight with gods/a place to rule for gods, Israel The term Lucifel is most likely brought by Japan, although they should not have this problem locally, because they fight hard Lucifer is a ルシフェルr and an l is not distinguished. It was passed from second hand to third hand to China, and it became a well-known saying when it was spread on the Internet. He was originally Lucifer before he fell into the sky Is it necessary to break down hell? Is it hel~el? The prefix is hell and the suffix is god, but hel is a Germanic root and Hebrew is not from the same period and language family. It is impossible to write "Microwave Suitable" on the bottom of porcelain in the Qing Dynasty.