Rebirth Before the Doomsday: My Backing Is the Country

The protagonist repeatedly revisits the ten days before the doomsday. The theme of time loop is not new, but the protagonist of this book directly chooses to cooperate with the national power after rebirth. Through the rapid mobilization ability of the state machine and the coordination of scientific research and industrial systems, he looks for clues to the doomsday. The entire plot advances at a very tight pace and has a strong sense of reality. It is a high-quality hard-core science fiction novel that makes people excited without knowing it.

Time loops back and we take advantage of the situation. The writing is very good. The flaws in the first few scenes do not hide the flaws. The protagonist changes quickly. I can only say that he is worthy of being the protagonist. I also recommend a book of the same type, "Will the World Be Destroyed Today?" Is also very good.

The protagonist repeatedly revisits the ten days before the doomsday. The theme of time loop is not new, but the protagonist of this book directly chooses to cooperate with the national power after rebirth. Through the rapid mobilization ability of the state machine and the coordination of scientific research and industrial systems, he looks for clues to the doomsday. The entire plot advances at a very tight pace and has a strong sense of reality. It is a high-quality hard-core science fiction novel that makes people excited without knowing it.

When the country comes into contact with the protagonist, it is too petty. It is not like the country is like a small lord or a small city-state facing outsiders.

Rewrite the first chapter of "Where do you eat barbecue"? If I hadn't been recommended by a group of friends and skipped "Where do you eat barbecue", I really wouldn't have been able to see those exciting parts later. After all, you are eating barbecue at the end of the world. It is too outrageous. If you rewrite the first chapter of eating barbecue, your grades will at least increase a lot. Look at how many people are stopped by your barbecue.

The summary is 8.5-9 Points for "Xiancao Yiben" From 2 o'clock in the middle of the night to reading the latest chapter in one breath, I read it for 3 and a half hours The characters have distinct personalities, from small to large, the main plot is clear and not cliché, the suspense is enough, and it is unbearable Keep watching The shortcoming is that the interaction between the protagonist and the female character Zhou Yu is a bit inappropriate. Everyone around them is busy working. Some of their "flirting" descriptions made me feel inappropriate, but it's okay because the protagonist The description of the line has very few scenes for the two of them, and this shortcoming is not obvious In summary, this is a fine film that is delayed by the name. The plot of the little characters in the middle under the mobilization of the country is very brilliant, but the description of other countries It's also a little bit intellectual And if you write too many scenes of little characters serving the country without asking for compensation, you will get bored easily, which will test the author's subsequent writing skills But for the current hundred chapters, it's 100% 8.5-9 Points.

Read Chapter 116. Wonderful. A very powerful idea. It is a pity that in the face of the crisis for all mankind, we failed to organize the world. The country in the story is powerful, but also too lonely. In fact, starting from the third rebirth, you can join the senior management and slowly build a global assistance platform for future male protagonists. There are also scientists, who should establish a global assistance platform for the male protagonist's future rebirth. But in the story, it is a bit unreasonable to insist on going your own way even if there is only a 20% success rate. Is China a global public enemy? Or the top management are completely unaware of the serious challenges and do not consider seeking global resources for the male protagonist (now and in future rebirth). Are you stupid? The writing is a bit too red. I estimate that there should be global cooperation in the future. Anyway, during the early rebirths, when faced with the crisis of annihilating the human race, high-level decisions were foolish and the opportunity to rule the world was missed.

I started waiting for the refresh at 11:57 today. I subscribed as soon as possible after the refresh. After reading it, I found that it was ranked 61st. I guess book friends are using plug-ins. I will try to be in the top ten next time. The article is very good, but there are too few updates. The author still browses the comment area when he has nothing to do. It seems that he has more time.

The writing is smooth and the rhythm is tight. It is worth reading!

The subject matter is not new, but the plot does not have any intellectual appeal. The whole process is compact and basically without any moisture. If it can maintain this level until it is put on the shelves, and there will be some plots of the Gao Dynasty when it is put on the shelves, I can guarantee that this book will be booked 100,000 times

I passed this book several times, but when I saw the name, I had no desire to click on it. Fortunately, I came in and read the comment section, otherwise I would have missed such a good book.

How can I put it? The first doomsday was very exciting. The second time around, it felt like it was plummeting. You've already had a battery revolution. The results were not reflected at all. The Yamauchi team actually relied on manpower to carry supplies and solve the problem of energy density. With 26 years of technology now, everyone can have a power armor; and in the first apocalypse, every country can rely on supercomputer AI to arrange everything in an orderly manner. However, in the second apocalypse, technology has been developed for decades. In order to forcefully describe workers and sensationalize, the tasks issued by the recruitment factory do not match the manpower of the factory, and another factory is required to support it spontaneously. Why is it that your supercomputer does not allow manpower and cannot distribute tasks to two factories at the same time, or that you cannot directly synchronize the recruitment support tasks of another factory? And you, a logistics director, did not immediately think of additional supplies after the number of workers doubled. Instead, he waited until after the meal was finished before thinking of telling the factory, and then went to purchase. Why don't you know that doubling the number of workers means more food, or do you simply not know the material inventory of your factory? Even if you don't know it at first, when preparing food, you should know that it will be insufficient and start emergency purchasing, instead of arranging for spontaneous support from a hotel near the plot. Even if your integrated government supercomputer AI will not coordinate and arrange the logistics supplies of each factory, it will just be a simple recruitment and task indicator.

I have read Chapter 204 so far, and I have caught up with the latest chapter. Here are my thoughts after reading it: 1. This book can be said to be food and grass. At present, it cannot reach the level of fairy grass. The reasons are as follows. 2. It can be said that there is a natural unequal relationship between the protagonist and the reaper civilization. Of course, the advantage is the protagonist, because the protagonist has the ability to infinitely restart the cycle, and the opportunities are unlimited. As long as he dies, he can start over. Although it is said that every cycle has failed to lead mankind to avoid the doomsday, the opportunities are unlimited and success can always be achieved, even if the most extreme and impossible method is used, there is a probability of success. For example, during the second apocalypse, all mankind builds a spaceship for the protagonist that can sail very far, and allows the earth to be destroyed. Then the protagonist bets on encountering other alien civilizations during the voyage, and then establishes contact. In the next cycle, he will directly contact this civilization to avoid the apocalypse brought by the reapers. Even if no alien civilization is encountered in a certain direction, the protagonist can rely on the ability to cycle and sail in another direction next time, and there is still a chance of success. Although it is small, it has turned the so-called desperate doomsday into a joke. 3. Regarding the description of the supporting characters, although there are new plans and different story descriptions of the supporting characters in almost every cycle, it is too samey. Although I admire the behavior of the supporting characters in the article, it is too superficial. The author should refer to some top talents in reality. There are some special hobbies or habits, and even if a top-level talent has some special bad habits, the country will make corresponding adjustments and concessions because of his ability. This kind of role can actually be written to be seasoned, otherwise it will be too facial. 3. I have seen Chapter 204 so far. The only flaw is that the protagonist's positioning changes too quickly at the beginning. In the first cycle, the protagonist's image design can be said to be very good. He plays games in the base, which is consistent with the image of young people and does not understand the pattern of major events. However, in the second cycle, he directly starts to think from the perspective of a superior and issue commands. This lacks the process of foreshadowing and transformation, so here is a negative review. 4. Regarding the first issue I raised about the inequality between the two sides, I suggest that you set a limiter for the protagonist. For example, once the protagonist dies at the beginning of the second apocalypse, he will return to 100 days before the second apocalypse (not counting hibernation). Add a limiter to this rebirth. After the second apocalypse begins, the first cycle is 100 days before the doomsday, the second cycle is 99 days before the doomsday, and so on. The more urgent it is, the more urgent it will be to put the Reaper civilization and the protagonist at almost the same level. Otherwise, the protagonist will be given unlimited opportunities for trial and error and error tolerance, and there will be a lack of urgency. Although we all know that the protagonist will definitely solve the doomsday problem, a little sense of urgency is needed and readers want to know how the protagonist solves the doomsday in the future when time is getting shorter. This limiter will also promote readers' pursuit of reading. The author can refer to it. 5. According to the current situation, the protagonist's cycle will definitely be longer as time goes by. The first doomsday is 10 days, the second is 100 days, and the third and fourth doomsday will definitely be longer. Based on what the author has said, it may be a span of thousands of years and hundreds of thousands of years, so it is necessary to lay an anchor point for the protagonist. Otherwise, if the cycle continues for a long time, the protagonist will definitely change, not only in mentality, but also in body. Even if humans research hibernation equipment infinitely, the protagonist will definitely die normally. If he is not in a doomsday crisis at the time of normal death, then the protagonist will really die permanently. 6. To summarize, at present, this book is definitely considered a fine product. You can read it with confidence. Except for the protagonist's thinking change in the opening chapters, there are almost no poisonous points in the follow-up. There is no peeing point before the first doomsday. As for before the second apocalypse, it seems that the author deliberately speeded up the development and omitted a lot of unnecessary nonsense and filled it with stories of supporting characters. However, this also brought about the problems mentioned in my third article.

I have to admit that there are also smart foreigners who can roughly guess what Dongda is going to do based on clues and observations, thereby prompting their own country to join this plan to save the doomsday. In the end, humans asked the protagonists to unite and allocate resources, but it is a pity that the author could not write it. The Three-Body Problem is about smart people from different countries working together to face the wall and save humanity. It's not even interesting, but it's better than the terrible science fiction nowadays. Monthly vote has been cast

In the new book issue, follow-up reading and monthly tickets are very important. I beg you readers for your support! !

I was attracted by the first few chapters. Many articles that are published in the newspaper to embrace the country ignore a very important and refreshing point, which is the process of making the superiors believe from scratch without pretentiousness or intelligence. So far, the plot is compact and reasonable. I personally feel that it is the best among this type of novels.

It's not as good-looking as some reviews say, it can only be said to be above average.

The beginning is too blunt and too anxious. The protagonist suddenly realizes the truth, accepts the facts, and suddenly decides to save the world. It's a bit fake and has no sense of immersion. A normal person who just wakes up from death should think for a while, then quickly check the status of his family and friends, then fall into doubts about himself, and then immediately start to collect "time back" related information in the Internet library. At the same time, he begins to silently collect and corroborate world news within these ten days to see how the world is compared to the world before his death. Is it the same one, and then tries to save himself, hurriedly waiting until 12 o'clock on the last day, when the protagonist hides in the most closed safe house he can find, in front of dozens of mobile phone and computer screens, playing outdoor and indoor live broadcasts from different countries, regions, and fields around the world, but when the time comes, everyone is still dead and starts the second week of the show. After discovering that he will die in the second week, the protagonist is like a walking zombie or a death row prisoner with a fixed sentence. He quits his job, wanders around, and has a mental breakdown. On the last day, he walks on the street/sitting in the center of a crowded square/stands in a city center building overlooking the crowd,,, and then watches a large number of people die to start the third program. The protagonist of the third project gives up, quits his job, and spends the last ten days with his family to prepare for his death. After four weeks, the protagonist began to use the last ten days to have fun and have fun in the city every day. Fifth, Sixth, Seventh, Eighty-Nine... The 100th week begins with a nationwide and global journey to appreciate the world. After one hundred weeks, he started to engage in illegal activities, racing, robbing, rushing to get cards, and self-destruction. One Hundred and Fifty Zhou Mu was so disheartened that he began to find a deserted place to sit there until he died. Bibai Zhoumu awakened and began to accumulate and learn various skills to gradually strengthen himself. Three Hundred Weeks learned countless knowledge and became a complete protagonist. At the same time, we began to investigate all over the world to see if we could find any clues about the cause of death. The Four Hundred Weeks summarized countless investigation experiences and found that it was difficult to make any progress, and decided to tell mankind everything and work together to solve it... The main plot begins.

I remember reading something about handing it over more than ten years ago. It was popular at that time to use dissection as a guinea pig for research, but now it has started again. I really don't know what I think. I will think of handing it in, and I won't be afraid of dissecting you.

The author has some "good news" for you. I saw your book in Daily Guide 😏

The biggest shortcoming of this book is the lack of deductions about the technological development of future society. After the victory in the first retrospective, a section about superconducting material batteries was mentioned, but in the second retrospective, there is no description at all. It gives the impression that the world has not changed in the 34 years that the protagonist spent in hibernation. After 34 years, the description of the engineering contributions of ordinary people in the world is still very different from that of 34 years ago.

I knew that in the later stage of science fiction, when it was really impossible to promote the plot based on scientific principles, it started to play rear politics to attack the opponent. After all, it is almost difficult for science fiction to break through the existing cognition, which is understandable, but, alas

Really, I don't have the patience to read the details in many of the 50 pictures, including the three-body problem. It's true that the author wants to portray a person in the doomsday crisis. I like to see the results of every effort, but really every picture describes in detail the principles of building rockets. As a reader, I can't bear to read. What I want to see more is the results and the truth.

In fact, it is enough to watch the first apocalypse. The subsequent ones are directly mechanically ascending and traveling in a fleet. It is very boring and too fragmented. To put it simply, the first and second apocalypse can be regarded as popular literature, while the following ones are pure science fiction.

After reading Chapter 369, I feel that it is not that the earth in the book has a path dependence on the protagonist's time cycle, but that the author has a path dependence on the description of the crisis. The core is the same: encountering a civilization crisis, finding the only way, and then reaching the production limit. It seems that every crisis is like this, and the aesthetics is too tired.

First write about 10 days of rebirth, and then write about 100 days of rebirth. Do you want to start a routine and go down the road? The handling is extremely bad. There are many lines that can be continued. I don't understand why the author chose such a repetitive routine. First of all, if the aliens do not come for more than ten days, it does not mean that they will not come in the future. You can write that they will come after a year and be killed. Then you need to use this year and 10 days to find a way to avoid being discovered. , This method may be very costly, but you can survive for a long time to think of a better method. Use this method to ensure that you can avoid the 10-day crisis. After the middle text is decrypted, the routine can be that the alien civilization will take over the planet after a hundred years, and continue the apocalyptic story. The transformation can be written to bring about technological breakthroughs, and the sci-fi revenge story can be rewritten. Finally Finally Finally Don't rely on the point of "having great ambitions to sacrifice for something" to keep attracting readers. Although many readers have a correct outlook on life and will feel excited when they read this, you can use him as a hook. Don't rely on this to turn points 🙂

The plot is really passionate 😃 Gou's emotional drama 😰 The plot is really passionate 😃 Gou's emotional drama 😰 The plot is really passionate 😃 Gou's emotional drama 😰 The plot is really passionate 😃 Gou's emotional drama 😰 The plot is really passionate 😃 Gou's emotional drama 😰 The plot is really passionate 😃 Gou's emotional drama 😰

The protagonist lives until the end comes and then dies. As long as the protagonist is killed before the end comes, there will be no end.

😥 It's a science fiction film, and you're doing a sociological experiment with Mao. Abandoned😒

In my opinion, the relationship between authors and readers should obviously be mutually reinforcing, but now I have seen too many books and readers who are purely blind fans. Obviously there are flaws and unreasonable things, but someone pointed it out and the author considered revising it, or even asked again. This in itself is a kind of growth and progress for the author. But if there are many fans, they are there to help the author forcefully explain, "This is reasonable", "This is no problem", or simply wallow in "I like it, I think it is well written". So, what will the author do when he sees this situation? "It's not that he doesn't want to make corrections and doesn't pursue progress. What does it have to do with the fans?" Those who can remain sober despite being surrounded by numerous praises and even actual honors (benefits), and even reflect on themselves, are all outstanding among outstanding people. People themselves tend to deceive themselves and blind themselves. They all want to hear good things and don't want to hear bad things. This is human nature. Without these blindly supportive fans, many authors would actually be able to maintain their standards and improve through introspection with the help of readers. But there are too many such situations now. As far as this book is concerned, I have seen the second apocalypse, with more than 150 chapters. As long as someone raises a question in that section of the chapter - "The specific plot description is inconsistent with the future world background set by the author himself, and is more like the real world decades ago", there will definitely be fans who will reply "This is reasonable, this is not a question, this description is very good, I like it". So do the problems pointed out really exist? Will this problem disappear on its own because of fans' support and support? Will the author's level continue to improve because of these praises and love? I didn't read the following chapters, and I don't plan to read anymore, because the ending is obvious at a glance. It's just like the many books I've read. Surrounded by fans, the author never reflects on the problem, and his level never improves. It's a blessing if he doesn't regress.