Make Your Debut, Fairy

What does this book say? The author may want to take care of both, but personally I feel that it is comprehensive but not comprehensive - there is an information gap in bringing an ancient fairy to modern society, and it is exciting to watch her adapt to the environment; it is also exciting for modern people to travel through the ancient world of immortality and use modern thinking to open up blue oceans... But every time I go back and forth, it is exciting at first or stops when I change the map halfway through, and it is not exciting anymore. The author still has some writing skills, but lately, he has been hurriedly changing scenes at every turn, and he can't keep up.

The shortcomings of most books are that the details are poorly written. In this book, the writing and details are all right. On the contrary, the plot outline made me feel a bit sloppy, the meaning was too fast, and there was no connection between the plot and the plot. One second, I was engaged in self-media, and the next second, I went to entertainment. The transition was too abrupt. The plot that should be focused on is described in one stroke, and the plot that should be accelerated takes a lot of time to write, which looks a bit awkward and uncomfortable. But the small details such as emotional description, character creation, and daily dialogue are really well written.

The more I write, the more I get off track. . . .

Chapters 71 and 72 are becoming more and more interesting. In fact, this raises a question - that is, must all actions be based on utilitarianism? Or to put it more bluntly, do we have to act in a more "successful" way? The setting of this book has aroused a lot of discussion - you have the power to cultivate immortality and can crush anyone to death at will, why do you still act like an ordinary person? Are there actually any problems with these ideas? No. The protagonist of a novel is often the entry point for readers. In reality, we are all ordinary people without power. Then novels naturally have to play the role of satisfying readers' wishes. However, some trends always cause dissatisfaction among various readers. Why? That is, everyone's pursuit will not be the same. Some people want to cultivate immortality on earth to gain powerful power. This is essentially a desire for power. Some people want to see the love and interaction between the male and female protagonists, which is essentially the yearning for love. Some people want to see a harem and watch the heroines being obsessed with the hero, which is essentially a vision of glamour. These are the pursuits of readers. It's hard to tell which one is good, which one is bad, which one is right and which one is wrong. For example, this comment in the picture. Is he wrong? Yes, quite right. But not pertinent enough. Where is it not pertinent enough? This is what this reader said [The setting of cultivating immortals and the content of fighting skills are not really interesting or engaging. The specific plot of the realistic part and the positive feedback brought by the corresponding benefits are what the author is good at. Using the golden finger of cultivating immortality to make profits in reality and then feeding it back into cultivating immortality is the main line of career before this book, and the positive feedback loop established. This is also what readers are looking forward to seeing. What he [expects] is a [main line of career] such as [using the golden finger of cultivating immortality to make profits in reality and then feeding it back into cultivating immortality]. This is the right side of him, and as a reader, of course, I have the right to ask for this. Then why do you say he is [not fair enough]? Because he arbitrarily identifies what he [thinks] and [expects] as [what readers expect to see]. But [daily emotional communication and spiritual cultivation] are defined as [virtual things], and [space is too unconvincing]. Is that really what all readers of this book want to read? Not really. I believe there are many people who also want to see this kind of daily emotional exchange. Otherwise the data speaks for itself. Of course, you can say that the readers he mentioned do not refer to everyone, but this is somewhat self-deception. These criticisms have always existed, so the author gives his own answer through these two chapters-that is, it is not impossible, but unnecessary. Everyone has their own pursuits, and so does the author. The historical novel "Lin'an Nightless Marquis" is also a historical novel that focuses on career, but "The Ruyi Little Man" is more focused on emotions. "The Knight and the Wand" and "The Saint Comes Without Food" are both fantasy novels, but the former is more inclined to the history of the struggle of a low-level person who has made contributions, while the latter is a realistic opera of an idealist. Every author has his own choice, and every reader has his own choice. It's all free. Through these two chapters, the author turns readers' comments into the confusion of all living beings, and he is the one who is fascinated. But, he knew it. What the author writes is the tone of the book and what he wants to write. And readers can come and go as they choose. He knew very well that a novel could not satisfy everyone's preferences. Big guys like Yueguan, Dancing, Elbow, and Squid are still dissatisfied under their book reviews. There are still many people who choose to leave after watching it. So the author answered all the readers who questioned it through Meng Bai's lack of ambition when he was a child. This is not a matter of whether it is possible, but a matter of whether or not it is possible. Of course he can slap to death everyone who doesn't deal with him, he can let himself control the whole world, he can make himself the hidden king of the world, but Meng Bai [can not act]. He can [move or not move, not others, but me. Not everyone wants to write "Success and Fame", and not everyone wants to read "Success and Fame". You can be "in front of flowers and under the moonlight", and you can "walk freely". Why does the author say, "Each of your comments, whether they are pertinent like yours, have the same emotions as others, or others, good, bad, complimentary, or scolding, are all filling in the plot and adding persuasiveness." Because this is the [mystery of all living beings] that every author has to experience! Everyone expects you to be what they expect. Those who can solve this mystery will move forward, while those who cannot solve this mystery will disappear. If you have been in contact with the author circle, you will have heard the saying "As long as the data is not lost, don't care what the readers say." Why don't you care? Because of arrogance? No. It's because of the bloody reality. There are not many authors who reject their work because they obey the readers of their speech. Only by being able to clearly see these things under the "mystery of all living beings" can one become an accomplished writer. Reach the upper limit of what your talent can achieve. So what are the things under these [mysteries of all living beings]? The author's story is already very good. No reader will comment on their expectations for a novel that they don't like to read, because it's just rubbish and they don't want to read it at all. The reason why readers tell the author their expectations is essentially that they think the story is good-looking and want it to be more in line with their own tastes. These are from novels. So outside of novels, don't we all have to face the [mystery of all living beings]? Your parents, teachers, friends, and bosses all have expectations and requirements for you. Their expectations may be unrelated or diametrically opposed. So do you want to listen to all this? I don't think so. You always have your choice. Sometimes, your choices are different from theirs. It's completely your choice. But in their view, your choice is not "correct" or "successful" enough. They will definitely feel that there are "better options" available to you. Just like what readers expect from the author. But in fact, as long as you walk on an objective and real path, take responsibility for your own choices, and accept the price you bear, there is no such thing as "more correct". Just like the author, he has chosen a path. This path may not meet the expectations of some readers [leverage strengths and avoid weaknesses], but this is his choice. I also decided to bear the consequences of my choices, and that was enough. Of course, what I am talking about is just a small personal opinion, and I am also a member of all living beings. These are sentient beings This is also sentient beings These are all sentient beings.

Those who clicked on this name must have wanted to see the story of the heroine's debut on the earth's short video platform or in the entertainment industry. What they wanted to see was the collision between cultivating gods and the city, the interweaving of traffic and incense. The plot of the modern city was both addictive and foreshadowing at the beginning, but the plot of twenty or thirty river drums was inexplicable.

I read the hype a few days ago and read through the author's previous books. There is a problem that the author may not have noticed. Every time I write a good point, it disappears inexplicably halfway through the writing. The hole dug in the front is not filled in. To write a good point, you have to start from the beginning to the end. For an inexplicable transition, you have to bring back the previous good points. Reading novels is for fun. Who will read novels if they are not happy? I hope the author pays attention to this book. The subject matter and content are good. I hope you will work harder.

The writing in Tianjie is not interesting, and the subject matter is poorly written. It's nothing more than a pretense and a slap in the face after returning from cultivation.

I remember an anchor said that the essence of a successful anchor is to create a group of bottomless licking dogs, use them to PUA and filter leeks, and then package a unique personality around them. Fame, advertising and the big brother on the list will come naturally.

The writing is actually pretty good, or rather pretty.

The subject matter and creativity are good, but personally I think the pace is a bit slow. While the author changed himself, he also gave up his previous advantages. If you can't attract others to follow you, you can add some rhythm or create a little climax.