Starting with the Destruction of Dunkirk

Minor historical war articles. The male protagonist travels from a player who loves war games to the real battlefield of World War I. What will he do? I have also discussed this issue with the author. Should I just pick up the gun and start shooting? My suggestion is that the male protagonist can like war games, but he cannot like war. Therefore, the author spent effort to describe the psychological changes of the male protagonist and various objective coincidences to give the male protagonist a stance to fight. Coupled with the author's solid historical research, the book has a very strong sense of reality. I think readers who like war movies can give it a try.

The author is very good at writing books 👍 I don't have any money to reward you, but I voted for you with all my 4-month votes Write books for the rest of your life! So pretty

I don't know what everyone thinks of this book, but I initially went there for the "joyfulness"—and that's certainly true of the opening plot. But the further you go, the harder it becomes to take on the role of the protagonist. As a time traveler, he had no ideological baggage of being loyal to Germany, but now that he writes, he seems to have lost his personal emotions. Previously, he had sided with the duke and concealed food, but now he was thinking of the emperor in everything. He has made so many achievements, but has only been promoted to major general so far. The author repeatedly uses his age as an issue, but since he is so outstanding, the British regard him as a serious problem, while other domestic factions and the emperor pay no attention to him? In the latest chapter, even his opinions are not accepted because "a mere major general is not qualified" - is this reasonable? Since it was emphasized earlier that the major general is only limited by his age, doesn't anyone recognize his ability? What makes me even more uncomfortable is that the emperor and other factions despise him and feel that he is not worthy of being equal to them. The protagonist himself is concerned about the country and the people, like a selfless saint, without any personal calculations or emotional fluctuations. This kind of character building was really difficult for me to resonate with, and the more I read, the more frustrated I became. The above is just my personal feeling, which can be regarded as real feedback after reading.

So which political line will the protagonist walk? What is opposed is the monarch (reversing the trend). Will he take the devil's rise and replace it with a mustache, or will he take an unimagined path in November? You won't take the blue line, right?

You let the students play the monitor, which is vivid; You let the students play the teacher, which is one-sided; You let the students play the principal, who is catching wind and shadow; You let the students play the mayor, which is absurd and uninhibited. So most authors can only play with the patriarchal system of another world to simulate controlling resources in their own cognitive way, while imitating sages to dilute the sense of distortion. It is said that "the road never imagined" is shocking. During World War I, the information gap, and South Germany, which of these elements have not been written about thousands of times? Just as the first "Douluo" was enjoyable to read, the third "Douluo" was difficult to finish. If this book might not have been able to become a god 30 years ago, it might not have been able to leave memories 20 years ago, and it might not have been commercially successful 10 years ago, it might not be a commercial success now. . . Writing this is both regret and encouragement. I hope the author will work harder and not choose chapter names.

There are too many times in the plot where Lelouch mentions something and everyone looks grateful/appreciative/admiring. This is not to say that this kind of plot is not good. It is indeed one of the main points of the book, but too much will only make people feel boring. The protagonist can give some pointers on big things, but it's better not to mention small things (such as specific tactical planning and weapon application). It's better to let these famous soldiers in history understand it themselves. Because there will be no shortage of such plots of gratitude in the future. If the protagonist does everything, the German army will appear too human-machine, and the plot will be too stand-alone. The protagonist's collection of famous generals will become meaningless, and even hinder the progress of these generals to a certain extent - turning famous historical generals into stand-alone NPCs, how can one become a famous general without the ability to draw inferences from one example? This kind of plot is very taboo in deductions, even more serious than the previous idealized deduction. I hope the author can slightly control the proportion of this kind of plot.

Every time I set myself up in such a good situation, it's so tiring to watch.

Nowadays, the rules of the book review area are corrupt and traitors are everywhere. This is due to the lack of updates. If the author diligently updates 10,000 words every day, then the traitors will be afraid and retreat, and the moral gentlemen will rejoice. This is a feat worthy of praise by Yao and Shun. I have heard that calves born in sheep pens do not behave like sheep when they grow up. You are at the starting point and your computer keyboard is often used, but you have lost interest in updating it. Is this reasonable? Qidian is strong because it has inherited the etiquette and skills of its ancestors. Stop bursting, the pressure has nowhere to release, and instead you become tired. Isn't this the same as abandoning the roots of the tree and pursuing the treetops? If this continues, great disaster will surely happen! The reason why Bai Jin can earn tens of thousands of royalties and not be harmed by villains is precisely because they are willing to listen to what upright gentlemen have to say! But Pujie cannot get royalties, and is even looked down upon by his girlfriend. This is because they are close to evil villains. I hope you can think carefully about the difference. There is one thing for which the author can cry bitterly, and six things for which the author can sigh. Since ancient times, when performing actions, the words are often very passionate. If they are not passionate, they will not be able to move the actor's heart. Harsh words are akin to slander. Author, you should think carefully about whether such a thing is right or wrong. Those authors who rarely updated, delayed updates, or missed updates had no time to feel sad about themselves, so they were drowned in the torrent of works, leaving only later authors to feel sad about them; later authors felt sad and did not learn from it, and future authors felt sad about it!

I subscribed to some of the paid chapters in bulk, but I couldn't stand watching until the end of the first 20 chapters. The author couldn't stand it anymore when he started talking nonsense about combat.

Sofa, No. 1, Finally started a new book

The Kaiser and the main war faction are very hostile to each other, which makes people feel very uncomfortable. It is a bit satisfying to beat the British and French. Can the author find a way to put your father-in-law in power so that readers can feel refreshed?

What a drama it would be for a Westerner to call him "father" or "fellow countryman"! I also saw a dialogue written in a book that said: The king has passed away. How should we translate these sentences in our national language? This is not to say that the quality of the novel is not good, but it feels very awkward. A tongue twister will make my brain burn.

Good guy, have you fucked me directly from the Three Kingdoms to the First World War?

There is a saying, but there is no need to gild it. Lelouch had already wiped out 5 million enemies with Germany II, and even went to the academy to give lessons to others.

It was okay in the past. In the past few dozen chapters, the author has really let himself go. When writing, he was completely immersed in his own world, completely divorced from the world structure and objective reality of the First World War.

After reading the introduction and pulling down the kings on both sides, what kind of government will we build in the future? A monarchy where you are the king? The kind of democratic government or military government that fights to death? A democratic government or a military government that appoints a designated successor? A theocratic government? The parliamentary system, the semi-presidential system, the presidential system based on the constitution from the beginning...

I generally don't read historical texts that don't have any success, because I don't believe that people without special skills could do well in ancient times. This makes me feel like my brain really can't keep up sometimes and I need to read it a few more times.

If you understand it, you will save a lot of trouble

Lelouch

It feels uncomfortable to read it under an alternate name all the time. Why is it okay when my neighbor uses his real name?

I looked at the protagonist's name, let's have a taste

Did you open a big one today? Winning a battle is king and king, awesome. This is probably something that no one expected.

I don't understand. Coal mines are consumables and are more worthy of full possession than iron mines. Just because they are satisfied with being in Hedong for 50 years? The military strength is enough to hold it, and there is no way that the bottom line is given out at the beginning of the negotiation!

The naval battle is about to begin. I like watching battleships bombard each other. It would be better to write about the story of building battleships.

There are too many alternative names. Is even the word "tyrannical president" a sensitive word?

Why didn't Mackensen attack the United Fleet when he broke diplomatic relations? The Anglo-American combined fleet only has 8 343s, 4-6 356s (depending on how many are in service in New Mexico), 4 381s and 1 Princess, while the High Seas Fleet has 4 Helgoland, 1 Seva (German 320 is regarded as the British 343), 5 Caesar, 4 King, 4 Bavaria, 1 Hindenburg, 4 Mackensen, which is actually superior.

Let me give you a suggestion. The name of the country is really funny.

I think that if it is just to avoid the real country name becoming a sensitive word, can we simply transliterate it according to the English name of the country? It is not difficult to understand for Chinese people who have English as a compulsory course. For example, the British name is Ingrid, or Britten, the French name is France, the German name is Germani, the Italian name is Itali, the Benelux can be called Belkin, Luxembourg, and Nazerland respectively, the two teeth are called Spain and Portuga, Austria is called Ostrich, and Russia is called Lacia, etc. In this way, if a new country appears, just read it according to this rule and you will know which country it is, and the author does not have to waste his brain to think of some plausible names. Some country names are directly transliterated, such as Norway and Finland, so they can only be dealt with using variations.

There are quite a few pictures, just like reading a serious newspaper. It's just that a bunch of data on various levels and numbers in naval warfare is not very readable. I don't know what will happen next.

Good looking, seeking refinement