Detective Conan: What's Wrong with a Detective Liking Money?

There is something wrong with his outlook on life and his logic is wrong. For the sake of money, he just left the murderer alone. The key money was not given by the murderer, but by the protagonist to blackmail an outsider. The outsider gave you the money and didn't ask you to let the murderer go. So you just ignored the murderer and turned the case into a suicide case? If the protagonist loves money, it would be reasonable to let the murderer pay for peace no matter what!

There is something wrong with your three views. If you are doing it for money, then it is an opportunity to make money. In the first chapter, the poison is exposed. If a man cheats on someone, moral criticism or a small punishment or a big warning is OK. He does not seek to make money from the girl nor does he want to harm her. This woman killed someone and put the blame on others. From a purely human and moral perspective, this woman is far worse than the man. Authors are always prone to write mistakes. The book about ruthless gangsters was deleted only after fierce battles between the Self-Defense Forces at sea. I didn't notice that the two books were written by the same author.

Author, do you know why this book's scores are so low? The biggest highlight of Conan fandom is to remove CP and include the women in it. Take a look at what you wrote.

The copywriting shows that the three views are not correct, how did it pass the review?

The so-called refined egoism is a fig leaf for the incorrect outlook of the protagonist in this book! Self-interest is normal for everyone, but adding the so-called refined self-interest is a crime, which advocates incorrect three views. It is like three people with two chances of survival. Self-interested people will work hard to seize the chance of survival just for themselves, while so-called refined ones will want to grab two or destroy or sell them to benefit themselves. There is a certain essential difference between the two for a normal person. People all have feelings and sympathies, and it's okay to have a little bit of subjectivity or personal feelings, especially when this book is in the public's eyes. Many murderers are worthy of sympathy. Some of them can be helped by the protagonist of the novel, but some of them cannot be helped! I am not someone who wants to see a positive protagonist. The protagonist can be good or bad, kill decisively for self or benefit, do bad things, and have his or her own character. But after reading one chapter, I felt extremely disgusted by the character of the protagonist. This is not something that the author's so-called refined self-interest can cover up. I have read many Conan fanfics, and there are good and bad protagonists, but this is the first one that made me feel sick.

Why are there so many moral defenders in the comment area who are worried about little Japan? . .

If you need money, you can collect Maple Leaf gold coins, take advantage of future trends, stocks, invest in popular companies, etc.

What do you mean? Is the gangster coming to an end?

You write well in the large account. Why do you suddenly want to open a small account? Don't do it. The books on both sides will be broken later. Azu, please use your amazing wisdom and speech!

At the beginning, you should take it all. By the way, you also want the woman's money and her people.