Weird Talk About Rules: I Can Randomize Entries

① The three golden chapters are considered useless. No explanation. Just read one chapter and you'll understand. ②Many plots only have consequences and no reasons. There is no mention of the content of the game, speculation about the worldview and background, or the psychology of the protagonist. It feels like it is too eager to get to the point, which seems a bit baffling. Inadequate shaping ability and difficulty in leaving an impression. ③ I didn't read the author's homepage, but I blindly guessed that he was a novice. The writing style is too shallow, the word order is strange in many places, and commas are missing. I feel like the author could learn some narrative skills properly, and remember that writing a novel is like telling a story, it doesn't just tell you information and then it's done. There are many places that could obviously be expanded upon, but they are just mentioned in one stroke. How can it be called a novel? If this book becomes better later, readers are welcome to come back and step on mekkkk... I will be happy to review it again.

Typos are okay, but author, your question marks and periods mixed up really affect the perception.

It's here to introduce poison. I haven't looked at it. I'll keep it first.