NBA: Coaching the Lakers, Starting with Shaq's Departure

Nash, who was invited back from the thatched cottage three times, gave up after one year. At the beginning, he vowed to ensure that he would win the championship. Is this still cheating? Nash is still the player with the highest favorability and the most supportive of the protagonist. Kobe, Nash, my sister-in-law, any role player, or a dog can play in the finals. The protagonist is worse than a dog. At least the dog knows how to be grateful.

The protagonist of a book can be a good person, an ordinary person, or even a bad person, but he cannot be a villain.

Based on the nature of the novel, the protagonist's betrayal is not a big problem, but Nash's popularity and fans are underestimated. Sports novels can also be considered fan fiction. When a real-life player joins the protagonist's team with an upright image, the issue of fans and popularity must be considered. The protagonist first uses the championship to fool Nash, and gives Nash as a championshipless superstar. At the point where Nash fans realized their dreams in the novel, they backhandedly sent Nash away and replaced him with a new one. The author may not have had that idea, but it looked like he was at the peak of his career rather than just debuting. The final calculation was that it was a direct waste of Nash's year. As a character who started with a positive image, it is reasonable for readers to have such a big reaction now.

Don't you, the author, even read the comments section? Take a look at the readers' opinions. This plot is too poisonous. Peak Nash is replaced by rookie Paul. Still, when the protagonist deliberately breaks his promise and becomes a villain, how can anyone watch it? If you feel that you can't find a reasonable reason for Nash to win the championship, then you can let the system cheat. Even if the system is bigger and the victory is more difficult, it is much better than writing a garbage protagonist.

Nash is really the peak of the genius. He sold it and raised Paul in one year. He has read so many books and was poisoned the first time.

Peak Nash for rookie Paul? Really poisonous, extremely poisonous. It's obviously well written before.

It's poisonous. I begged to sign Nash and then sell it. It's also 6. What's the use of the system?

In fact, it would have been better for the protagonist to coach the Lakers earlier. There was a big fish like Kidd in the free market in 2003 At that time, Kidd did not have to renew his contract, but had the intention to leave the team. He almost reached an agreement with the Spurs that year I remember that the reason why it did not succeed in the end was that Kidd's wife found a job at the New Jersey TV station and refused to let Kidd change teams As long as he helps Kidd's wife find a job in Los Angeles, Kidd can be said to be one of the most suitable point guards for Kobe throughout NBA history What Kidd was best at during the Nets period was leading defensive pressure and defensive counterattacks. I can't imagine how strong the defensive pressure of forming a backcourt combination with Kobe is

First of all, Nash and Kobe can definitely be matched, provided that Kobe plays without the ball in regular time. This requires coaching. Secondly, there are those who have no defense. In Kobe's twenty-year career, apart from Payton who was defensive in 2003-04, which point guard in the other years was defensive? Kobe's style of play is a combination of off-ball and on-ball play. Same as Curry. What Kobe needs is just the right to shoot the ball, rather than holding the ball for a long time like a big core holding the ball Secondly, Kobe can also play small ball. A tall man like Durant is as comfortable as a fish in water in the Warriors' small system. Kobe can also be outside the system like Durant. During regular time, he acted as a shooter without the ball, but his tactics failed to work, so he had to attack in one-on-one situations. Again, you can still be a Thompson and only play without the ball. And Nash is the best poker player, but it's a pity that the author doesn't understand. It is said that the dealer and the pitcher are not compatible Finally, the one who is incompatible with Nash is Gasol inside. It is true that Gasol can be pulled out for long-range shots. However, limited by his physical fitness, his running and jumping ability is not strong and his speed is not fast. You can't play run-and-gun, and you'll get called out if you play small ball. Don't overestimate Gasol's defense. In the 2011 playoffs, he was beaten by an older driver. The two have similar height, wingspan, and athletic ability, but they were beaten by the older driver. One can imagine his defensive ability. Not even a little restrictive. There is only one reason. Driver can shoot threes. Gasol can't defend the three-point line. With small ball play or run and gun play, how could the inside not be pulled out? One characteristic of this style of play is that it is fast, using fast to defeat slow. So Gasol and Nash are the ones who are incompatible. Unless he is allowed to play the position of the Warriors' regular center Bodog, this is tantamount to invalidating his martial arts. And Gasol doesn't have Bodog's ability to protect the inside frame In summary, the author doesn't understand the ball...

Nash was not suitable for the Lakers during that period. I don't understand why I wrote a novel about this.