History Spoilers: Starting with the World Wars

Many history novices actually use the terms "Qin Shi Huang" and "Han Wudi" as insults. Even the most incompetent rulers of ancient times wouldn't want to be associated with them. Han Wudi is somewhat more neutral, receiving both praise and criticism. Qin Shi Huang, however, is consistently condemned. People admire his system, not the person himself.

Or maybe we could let the mutants from the Eastern Han Dynasty go, and then a bunch of people would go and ambush Hua Tuo.

I haven't read it yet. Is this book a Qin Dynasty fanboy/fangirl book? Is it trying to whitewash the tyrant?

Let me write a review. Overall, it feels very disorganized, quite different from the popular review articles of the past. It lacks a clear theme. I initially thought the author was simply chasing trends or looking at data, writing about whichever type of reader had the most readers and the easiest data. But now I realize I was wrong; it's just very scattered and lacks focus.

If it's just marketing content, then don't bother reading it. As a Three Kingdoms enthusiast, I was immediately infuriated when I opened Chapter 5. Are there so many Han Dynasty haters these days? They say Guan Yu's only achievement was beheading Yan Liang, and that Yan Liang wasn't very good, and that's his only accomplishment? Why don't we talk about Cao Cao instead? One despicable thing after another...

The museum displays a stone from the Warring States period with an inscription that roughly translates to: "Greetings, gentlemen of later generations! We are called xxx and xxx, and we are fishermen and guardians of the king's tomb." When I saw this artifact on the program, I felt a resonance with it.

Man and ape parted ways. Only a few stones had been ground, in childhood days. Flames roared in the bronze and iron furnace; when will we ever understand? Just a few thousand years of heat and cold. Laughter is rare in this world; on the battlefield, bows are drawn against each other. Blood has flowed across the plains.

In matters of life and death, Ying Zheng was indeed less magnanimous than Liu Bang! Liu Bang believed that life and death were preordained, and wealth and honor were determined by Heaven! Since the disease couldn't be cured, then there was no point in trying; what was the harm in dying anyway? Empress Lü asked, "What path should the Han Dynasty take in the future?"

Why are there no short video novels comparing modern times to criticize feudal dynasties? They all praise emperors and ancient people. Damn it, we probably don't know as many modern heroes and outstanding figures as we do about ancient times.

Did Guan Yu have a record of fighting alongside Sa Na? 1. While Guan Yu's feat of beheading Yan Liang is acknowledged, it's merely icing on the cake. Xun You was the main contributor, with Zhang Liao providing support. Only then could Guan Yu launch a surprise attack and kill Yan Liang. Yet, it's been exaggerated to claim it as Guan Yu's achievement, a solo frontal kill of Yan Liang.