Infinite Civilization Simulator

This book is indeed quite novel and to my liking, but it also has shortcomings. What are the shortcomings? That is a limited time chapter, there are quite a few. Your civilization simulator can indeed change the history of the real world where the protagonist lives. The protagonist wants to use his existing history to infer his own choices. This is true. We try to compress the time into one to two pages. Even if we want to lay out some foreshadowing, I will limit it to 1 It ends within 2 chapters. This novel starts talking about real things in chapter 31, and then it doesn't start talking about the simulator again until chapter 36. I know you are talking about foreshadowing, but it takes a lot of ink. Even if you divide chapters 31 to 36 into three paragraphs, it will be better than you can say in one breath. You have to feel comfortable after talking about six chapters of reality. I don't want to see how much your reality has changed. You can just talk about the end of chapter 1 to 2 of reality. Because you can't talk about reality too deeply. If you talk too deeply, you will easily enter a small dark room. So what I want to see is the protagonist's mentality as a gamer and the thoughts and ideas of a flower grower who grew up under the red flag. Transforming into ancient times, modern times or modern times, in this regard, the same sentence can be said, just end it with chapters 1 to 2. You told so many realistic stories from chapters 31 to 36 that I almost didn't let me give up this book. Your book is called Simulator. We see that your book is also about the reality in the simulator book. How is it going to develop? It doesn't matter if you don't have a sense of immersion. What's important is that the protagonist travels through time with the player's mentality, changes history, and doesn't make fun of it. Just like Liu Qiang buying melons, it's uncomfortable no matter how you look at it. The player's mentality is that he is not afraid of death. At worst, it will be restarted, but it does not mean that the player's mentality is a fool. I am a fun person. There are indeed fun people among players, but those who like to play simulators definitely belong to the textual research party and the plot party. You can have fun, but don't be too abrupt. Just go to the dog meat shop with you, and inexplicably say "Liu Qiang buys melons." How does this seem inconsistent? Qin Shihuang swept across Liuhe and unified the world before he had an accurate title. Then Qin Shihuang was destroyed by you. How did he pop up? It was also the kind of scale that weighs weights. How could it be the same as Liu Qiang buying melons? So at first glance, it seems inconsistent, and I suggest you don't have fun, don't make random jokes, and your book is not funny at all. This is what I think after reading more than 40 chapters of yours. This is how I am. If you have something to say, you can delete the post or block it. If you are not satisfied, you can delete the post or block it. Anyway, this is my idea. I have been blocked and deleted a lot for speaking out, but I can't change my faults. I still like to speak out. This book of yours should not be a joke or a joke, but give me the impact of different ideas on how to change history in a serious way. My belief as a player who is not afraid of death has made a breakthrough, so don't let me become a fun person. Let me reiterate again, especially your story about Liu Qiang buying melons. How does it seem inconsistent?

The northern minority that Emperor Taizong of the Tang Dynasty faced was the Turks, not the Huns. During the Han Dynasty, the Huns in the south were included in the territory, and the northern Huns moved westward and were basically no longer in northern China.

I've skipped these pictures, but in the later plot, you insist on arranging that little fairy to be the heroine. If you don't write about this girl, your data will at least triple. This girl will dissuade many readers.

I skipped through a few chapters. Author, why don't you delete the real-world plot? The main character looks like a retard. Just write the plot of the simulator specifically. Changes in the real world can be briefly mentioned, or don't write about the interaction between the protagonist and other characters, just write about historical changes.

There is a beauty in missing a brain. Is this performance art?

The productivity of science and technology determines the lethality. The result of the intrusion of science and technology is why history still develops as it was before and why there are still so-called border enemies. The world feedback from the British who started the industrial revolution is that the sun never sets on the empire, leave you alone

The logic is completely wrong, and crazy criticism also has internal logic. This novel has no logic at all, and I can't find the thread. Goodbye.

You want to laugh me to death, right? Originally, your book had a lot of flaws, but in the end, a crazy woman took advantage of the fact that the male protagonist, a top swordsman who had practiced swordsmanship and was skilled in swordsmanship, was pinned down and bitten by a dog. You can't even maintain your standards, and your crappy book isn't even good writing.

There are two players who are a bit toxic, why should we add one more?

Keep writing simulations, brother, and don't worry about your urban cool articles. I couldn't stand it anymore and ran away.