Ruling Hollywood

The writing style of the novel is very good, but there are many awkward points. As a photographer, I take some photos and exaggerate other people's reactions. Then I shoot the MV, and the consumers praise the MV when I write about it. It's really embarrassing! Actually, these things are really not important, no one cares about them!

Two shortcomings: 1. Over exaggerating the protagonist's achievements. Just let the stars fawn over you when they shoot a MV. In fact, American singers make more money than movie stars. How can anyone expect a MV director? It's better to just take charge of it yourself when you're not interested. The rest of the shoots for magazines, film photography, etc. Are all similarly over-exaggerated. He didn't achieve much, and a lot of Hollywood stars were fawning over him, which was embarrassing. When Zhu Dazui first became famous, he dared to act like a big star with Spielberg when he filmed Captain Hook. What does the protagonist mean? 2. The characters are clearly divided into good and bad formations. In fact, American Entertainment has shed the pretense of fairy tales since White Thirteen and set a dark tone. Chicago has even connected American Entertainment with American politics, society, etc. So if you look at Korean entertainment, it is often about fairy tales, pure love, and freshness, while American entertainment is about power and money trading, red sofas, etc. This is the default tone formed by readers. The same goes for entertainment characters. No one is absolutely good. Everyone uses each other. Although this book does not describe the supporting characters as too pure, the people who appear on the protagonist's side will always be on the protagonist's side. Although their intentions may not be pure, they are not necessarily good people; and those who do harm to the protagonist will always do harm to the protagonist, and there is never an example of the protagonist turning around and cooperating. The author may not have written it this way intentionally, and there may be one or two exceptions, but that's generally the case. When reading other entertainment articles, readers are always worried that the person who works with the protagonist will stab him at any time, but this book will never let readers have such a sense of crisis. The monotonous camp division is very ancient style. The above two points make this book feel like a fairy tale. The protagonist is just like the protagonist in the children's animation. He holds a dragon-slaying knife (Golden Finger) and fights all the way to the end. Although the journey is not without twists and turns, there is nothing to worry about. This is an advantage in Pokémon fan fiction, but in entertainment fiction it becomes too peaceful and loses the sense of reality, making everything look like the protagonist's obscenity.

In fact, I don't think Scarlett is very good-looking. It's just that the role of Black Widow made her famous. Hollywood has never been short of beauties. Some have succeeded, some have sunk, and some have disappeared. It's like the waves behind push the waves ahead, and the waves before die on the director's bed.

I know you respect Zunlong, but don't think about the context of the writing. Americans can call their parents by their first names when getting along. Don't you feel awkward when you, a white director with over 100 million in Hollywood, are always talking to a yellow actor? Just say you're fine

Chapter 180, private goods are a bit disgusting. I praise you to the heavens even if you are a dragon. Returning to a god-like character! As a result, I searched for Zun Long's works and awards in the United States. Hey, he was nominated for two Golden Globe Awards in the 1980s. The other awards are all unheard of. Furthermore, since the 1990s, there have been surprisingly few works, and many of them are from Hong Kong and Mainland China. There are only a few movies produced by Hollywood. There are only a few films in more than ten years, except for Jackie Chan's major role in Peak. In other Hollywood works, there is no role at all. At this time in early 2000, there was a high probability that he wanted to come to the mainland to make money. This is actually praised to the heavens by the author!

Can the protagonist not be so low? Isn't the point of entertainment about money, beauties, mansions, and luxury cars? You cut it in half. Nowadays, many people who write about entertainment have become big bosses and are very rich. As a result, they have no assistant when they go out and no nanny when they come home. The explanation is for privacy. In fact, to put it bluntly, it is low. Your article is the first time I have seen a Hollywood boss who does not live in a villa use this explanation. Don't read the news and treat it as the truth. According to your logic, villas and luxury cars in the United States are not bought by the rich?

Chloë Grace Moretz, 2005, about eight years old, interviewing for Fifty Shades of Grey?

What is the name of this novel? Dominate Hollywood? Until it was put on the shelves, it had nothing to do with Hollywood. No matter how many music videos and advertisements were shot, it was still not as good as one movie. As a reborn person, I don't want to try my best to copy a movie to become famous, and I am still here copying advertisements. Who likes to see advertising creativity? It is not really original and they are all copied. Why not copy movies? Not copying songs? An excellent movie or a popular song can earn at least tens of millions. No matter how good your advertising creativity is, you can only make tens of thousands of dollars a year if you do dozens of projects, and you have to keep doing it. Once the creativity is copied, it has no value, and film and television songs still have copyrights that continue to create value. As for making a MV first to gain fame and then making a movie, it's even more ridiculous. No matter how good the MV is, it will not be recognized by the film production company. You can only try your luck. Luck is not the author's final say, so why not get the opportunity to make a movie without starting? In the final analysis, it's the title of the book!

It feels boring to watch. The theme is to shoot commercials, make music videos, and then make movies. The running accounts are the same, and the movie-making process is too omitted. This is why I don't like to read simple director's books. If I don't look up the background stories of each movie, the writing of the creative story will be very dry. Actors or acting and directing can write more about the shooting and acting process. One of the selling points of this book is its venomous tongue. It felt a bit novel at first, but then it became really boring and I got tired of reading it.

If you don't play with women, I'll introduce you to your brother every day. Did you come here to write about brothers playing with girls? Is there nothing to write about? I'm not saying I'm not allowed to write, but what's the point?