Period: My 1984 Dual World Gateway

My family owns a small supermarket. Let me tell you, opening a small supermarket is not suitable for time travel. There are many things to do, and you will be alone for a while. You have to keep an eye on the store! In order to visit the store, I don't even have time to travel through time now.

This kind of double penetration should highlight the contradictions and twists of that era and the ever-present warmth, and write about ordinary people who can appropriately feed back the country and society. After all, you can't help everyone. Unless you learn from the cooperation between the two countries in 1949, you can just write stories about country bumpkins. (Personally, I feel it's hard to say, so I don't accept advice)

There are no good people in the whole village. Why help? It's not easy to make a fortune by yourself.

The people in the village are very nice. Anyone who wants to eat chicken can just go and catch one from their place. ?? Then, the villagers came to eat the house again??

Wouldn't it be better to go back in time and buy design drawings or machinery directly than what you are eating? If you go to Wenzhou and resell an obsolete machine, you can make a lot of money.

It's too poisonous, I can't bear it!

Goldfinger is good, but it is used carelessly. Items from across the ages are brought and used at will. When the news is leaked, it cannot withstand scrutiny and investigation. There are too many traps. It either treats others as fools or assumes that human nature is inherently good and there are no evil people. It is too naive...

I thought it would look good, but it ended up being a mess.

It doesn't look good. There is no overall way to write it. One sentence here and there. As for the subject. There are too many pressing matters

I have endured the first two questions about the author's book. The price of grain in Chapter 83 is 0.174 Per catty, and the price of seeds is only 0.04 Per catty. Don't say it is the contract purchase price, because buying it from outside will definitely be higher than the contract purchase price. Don't say it is because the protagonist wants to help the villagers. If you want to say this, then it should be clearly expressed in the text. Chapter 85: Selling radios, the manager raised the price from 300 to 400. The protagonist disagreed. The protagonist compared five fingers. The manager wanted to discuss the price. The protagonist was about to leave. The manager saw that he couldn't negotiate the price anymore, so he said 400. Just 400, and the protagonist agreed. So what did the protagonist do who was said to be 400? The protagonist uses five fingers to express 400? Okay, I've endured the previous one. In Chapter 27 of the main text, the protagonist went to ask about student clothes sold at low prices. When the protagonist sold them to students, the price was 2 to 2.5 Yuan in big letters (including a set of stationery and a set of clothes), because the director mentioned earlier that the tuition fee was 1.5 Yuan, and the students all brought 4 yuan when they went to school. The protagonist goes to ask the eldest sister and explains that the family is poor, and there is nothing wrong with it, but later they say that the clothes have been sold to us, and you have no control over what we want to do with them, and there is nothing wrong with that. Then the protagonist goes back and thinks about it, and arranges for the student eldest sister to work in the factory in the village, and then sells a set of clothes to the students at a low price. Well, there is a conflict, but it looks too disgusting. You just write that his family member is sick and needs money and sells it without any other options. That is much better. Also, don't be so righteous in what this eldest sister said. If someone sells it to you for more than 1 yuan, then you can sell it outside for more than 10 yuan. The protagonist can still talk like this and help others. The protagonist is not interested in her. If you really want to help a primary school student, you can provide her with food and education. I think it is acceptable. Alas, the author should change it if he can. It would be much better if he changed it.