Hogwarts: The Wizarding Revolution

If you fight head-on, the wizard will lose. Either provoke a world war, or use witchcraft to assist capital, become a big capitalist, and control the world

Many people overlook the fact that in the Harry Potter world, ordinary people can also learn to use magic indirectly (that is, making spell props and alchemy), but they cannot cast spells spontaneously. James Stewart, the second headmaster of Ilfamoni, was clearly stated by Rowling as a Muggle. He was willing to learn from his witch wife and was willing to teach, and he became a master of enchanted items. His works include the Pukechi Sorting Statue and the Snakewood Wand. Even Wikipedia described his wand-making skills as "extraordinary magic." In the end, he even took over his wife's position as principal, and has always been a professor (not a faculty member like Filch, but a professor). The scariest thing is that he even discovered a way for Muggles to make wands without any consequences. This shows that if you really want to take over the magic world, you will not be a match for the Muggle world. It is impossible for wizards to resist the Muggles' huge and complete scientific research system. If you rely on your blood to cast spells, can't I develop a plug-in magic system to assist you? What's even more frightening is that the relationship between wizards and goblins is so bad that the main body of goblins wants the wizard to die all the time. If the goblins turn to the Muggles to help them get through the initial period of time, and provide samples of magic items for reference. Later, when the technology matures, it will be simply killing indiscriminately, not to mention the problem of the Muggle wizards taking sides. So in this regard, the original wizard protection law was not the loophole-filled reason given by the Ministry of Magic at all, but to ensure that magic and the use of magic would not spread on a large scale. Later, it was probably that the wizard couldn't bear to lose face and recorded it in the history books, causing the original reason to be lost. This can also explain why Grindelwald insists on grabbing time, because the marginal effects are mutual. If the time given to the Muggles' huge scientific research system is used, the wizards have no chance of winning, so they must be fast, accurate and ruthless. The wizards' biggest advantage is being in the dark, defeating the Muggles before they can react.

Originally I thought I could have two thousand points to myself, until I saw the words "signed", my eyes darkened and I fainted on the ground.

I was confused when I read the introduction. The scary thing about wizards is not their destructive power, right? It's about mobility and weird and hard-to-detect magic, right? I really don't understand, how can humans win in front of wizards who have three things: Apparition, compound potions, and the Imperius Curse? Even if the wizards are all reckless, it would be difficult to win with the technological level of mankind at that time, right? Not to mention that the leader of the wizard side is the prophet Grindelwald. Not only does he have brains, but he also knows that human beings are terrible. He can take advantage of the world war to sneak into the capitals of many countries to control political figures, and then weaken the military power of various countries, and wait for humans to think of themselves, and finally come out to clean up the mess? Did I overlook something? But I really don't understand how the wizard lost? Is it possible to fight against various human weapons? Hope the boss can clear up the confusion

The conditions for the birth of wizards determine that in the event of a full-scale war, wizards will lose. Because wizards will definitely split, and in the end the war will inevitably end with a group of wizards fighting ordinary people + mixed-race wizards.

It is a very speechless novel that has great power but is restrained. This seems to be the same-sex version of the female novel. Strength is the reason to be king. I have such great power but I have always been submissive like a slave. I can see the cowardice in my heart from here.

Not sure which direction this book is going to take? The protagonist disagrees with wizards, and is completely in favor of Muggles. Like Dumbledore, he cooperates with Muggles. Like Grindelwald, he advocates wizards dominating Muggles. He is also a terrorist like Voldemort. The protagonist neither wants wizards nor Muggles to die. He is neither willing to listen to others nor has his own opinions. But in the terrifying environment the protagonist is in, how can it be possible for you to stop and look around? In all kinds of snobbish conflicts, how can there be a way out without overwhelming force with absolute strength. The Holy Mother is not to be desired.

When Muggles and wizards go to war, all Muggle wizards are naturally traitors in reserve. Either guard the concentration camp and kill all the more aggressive ones. In the end, wouldn't it be the purebloods fighting against the purebloods and the mixed-bloods sitting on the fence? The Muggle-born Muggles with conversion syndrome fought harder against the Muggle-born purebreds who also suffered from the disease. Real-life example: Japanese Americans in World War II. Chinese Americans on the Korean battlefield. There are Chinese traitors, Japanese traitors, beautiful traitors, legal traitors, moral traitors in the world... But in most cases they are described as "anti-war people" 😜😜😜😜

Author, do you have an outline? When will the revolution begin?

In recent years, HP articles have become more and more in-depth.