Wandering the Worlds: Starting with a Blind Swordsman

Make up a poem number for the protagonist The sky is blind, the earth is blind, the heart is like a mirror, all worlds have infinite meaning, draw the sword One finger breaks the destiny, the spring breeze is down and everyone is at ease.

All Heavens Infinite Flow The character of the protagonist is a passionate blind man with a chivalrous heart and a strong sense of justice He has just come of age, does not think well, is easy to get into trouble, is used to blaming himself for everything, and has a savior mentality In this case, it is best not to involve too much in the emotions in the dungeon. To put it simply, do not leave worries in the dungeon. The bell is the first tragedy that the protagonist actively creates The protagonist practices his own chivalrous ways and a heart of justice. Kill evil people and save good people. Killing evil people will not make you feel guilty. Failure to save good people will indeed lead to regret and self-doubt. The protagonist is a bit like a perfectionist policeman in his heart. He is too noble. The protagonist's inner beliefs and behavior style are too separated I think if someone with this kind of personality in reality would die very quickly, and he would be the one who caused his own death.

The introduction is too vulgar and the main text is too elegant. Those who like to see vulgarity will not appreciate your youthful spirit. Those who like to see elegance will not click in after just one look at your introduction. That means those of us who are casual will still like you. If you can change the introduction, just change it. In fact, it is not difficult to change it. Let me tell you my personal suggestions. Delete the lines above the dividing line. Delete them for the sake of morality in your heart. Delete the sentence from martial arts to fairy. That's almost it. Let me tell you my reasons. First of all, the audience of your book will definitely not be able to stand the series of adding points. Subconsciously, they will feel that they cannot write this kind of book and it will be too homogeneous. The second point is that you can write a good guy protagonist but don't leak it in the introduction, because it is difficult to write a good guy. The number of truly good guy protagonists who have a good starting point and are still on the serial list can be counted on two hands. The third point is too vulgar and too big. To put it bluntly, who gave you the courage to think that you can write both martial arts and fairy tales well, just based on your 50,000-word Little Eunuch? Yes, these are my true thoughts when I saw this introduction. If I really didn't have any books to read, I would never click in.

Qiao Shan is here. If you want a 298 package massage, why don't you take off?

The writing is quite good, but would a time-traveler believe in officials or ancient scholars?

Est but the author's writing style was good for some logical problems. This problem may also be the reason why other readers feel that the host is being abused. First of all, this moral issue, I have only read Chapter 12, but in the second chapter, I feel a little bit like Jian Yu, but the big difference from Jian Yu is that everyone in it has no choice, so they can't retreat and fight. The author felt that there were many supporting roles written by him, so many of them dropped out.  Then the question comes, the protagonist has a choice, you don't have to go, no, because morality is due to kindness, then the contradiction arises, how can you repay the kindness of the little mute? What does the little mute want, just be safe and sound, how can you repay the kindness of the little mute's family? The thirty or so moral things are like walking a tightrope. I don't know, the author didn't mention it, so I will treat it as a risk within the controllable range. But I feel that Mr. Yang's matter, through the author's description, is uncontrollable. There are standards for morality, and there are different levels of kindness. If you can't distinguish between big favors and small favors, big righteousness and small righteousness, then there is no standard for values. I know the author wants to write about righteousness, but after all, it is written for modern people. If you have received modern education, are Chinese, and know about socialism, you will not expect the great master Qingtian. There has never been any emperor who can make decisions for the people. If you want righteousness, you must have an organization to practice it. There is no organization to build and no ideological foundation to spread. China relies on agricultural society and the liberation of farmers. Of course, writing it like that would deviate from the chivalrous theme of this book.                                                                                                                            The reason why you have to fight so hard for Master Yang is not clearly explained. The description of Master Yang is also not good, not vivid enough, and it is not worthy of making people feel that he should fight for his life for the time being. I know that the author wants to advance the plot and wants the protagonist to complete the task, but there must be standards for moral kindness. The kindness of a drop of water is repaid by a spring of water, but what about the kindness of a spring? Why repay kindness with kindness, repay kindness with kindness, repay kindness with kindness.

It's well written but not to my liking. A vote to break up.

Zhu Tianwen, the protagonist is sentimental and has a lot of inner drama. It's not necessary. Just be more free and easy. The protagonist is a blind man who has seen enough of the darkness in people's hearts, so let him live a free life. The world belongs to everyone, not just to the protagonist. He is not the savior.

The book is good, but I think it would be better if there was no resurrection. Life is precious, and death will be heavy and memorable. Adding the setting of resurrection makes it feel like child's play no matter how difficult the conditions for resurrection are. Ling Dang's character design is actually a bit thin, but if she is not resurrected, no matter what female character appears later, readers who read this book will remember that there was such a girl

Hello everyone, I am your good friend who updates twice a day. Nietzsche is not at home. As you all know, this is my new trumpet book. I wanted to try some different styles, so I opened this Zhutianliu. I also know that I have many shortcomings, so this book is also an exercise work (just bad money). I didn't want to post it originally, but after seeing some comments, I felt it was necessary to post it. (I have deleted those comments.) So for the sake of my mental health, I specially posted this. First: I welcome all book friends to speak out and leave comments about this chapter. Second: I will read all your suggestions and opinions. Third: I will also adopt [reasonable] suggestions and opinions to make changes in design and settings. Fourth: Useless comments that talk trash without any use, as well as trash comments that talk nonsense about me besides useless comments, I will delete them when I see them. Fifth: When I'm in a bad mood, I'll lash out at you with rubbish comments. After I'm done, I'll silence you. If you don't want to look at your claws, do you think I'm going to slap you in the face? Sixth: If you think the plot is unreasonable, please communicate in a friendly manner. If you don't like it, we will still be friends if we meet again in the future. Seventh: It's still the same sentence, if you have something, change it, if not, encourage me. Whatever attitude you have, I will have the same attitude. If you are friendly, friend, then we are friends; if you are a trash, you sell swords, then I will decide how to treat you according to my mood. Above.