Give the Fragile Girl a Heart of Steel

After skipping through dozens of chapters, I personally feel that the protagonist of this book is really twisted. It may be that the author's writing skills are not strong enough. The author seems to want to write about the "weak mentality" and "strong mentality" discussed in some serious literary works. He wants to write some stories in which the protagonist bursts the ideal bubble of "weak women"'s self-imagination, so that they can recognize reality and fight back against the suffering of reality. However, when I was reading this book, I did not feel the strong spirit of the protagonist, who is "cold in the face of thousands of people, bowing his head and willing to be a coward". I only saw a guy who despises the suffering of others to gain a sense of superiority. His methods of saving "weak women" are extreme, his purpose is not pure, and the protagonist himself is not a "strong man". This results in a distorted perception of the reader. And in this extremely twisted rescue process that struck me as particularly ridiculous, the male protagonist turned the "weak woman" into a kind of "believer" instead of a real "person". Really, it's hard for me to accept it. I thought the author would write about how a "weak girl" could become a "superman" herself, but in the end, the idea was only superficial and crude. Finally, I hope the author will take a good look at the "Three Transformations" thought from the philosopher Nietzsche

The result of the drug test: There are ideas, but the writing is not good. The rescue that the author wants to write has a darker style, which is to constantly use suffering to break through the bottom line of the female protagonist, in order to achieve a "self-awakening" result. If you think of rescue as a game, there are three endings: good end, successful rescue bad end, failed rescue true end, blackening or suicide Logically speaking, in fact, this kind of dark rescue is more likely to lead to bad and true end, but it seems to me that the male protagonist has never thought about whether he will achieve a bad or a true ending, but firmly believes that his method must be a good ending. If not, it must be that the damage is not deep enough. This is too presumptuous. Either the protagonist is a bit darker, saying that this is the fastest and most beneficial way, and that if he cannot be saved, then respect the fate of others. It doesn't matter if you achieve bad or true. Either the protagonist should be whiter, say that he has made preparations and will not let her die, say that he feels a little guilty but you must learn to be strong, and show the protagonist's efforts to avoid bad and true or feel some guilt about his own way of saving. This article does not consider bad and true at all, which is a bit self-righteous. I cannot get the advantages of this character, maybe other book friends can. In my opinion, the protagonist can be a virgin, rational, dark and cruel, and honest and simple, but the self-righteous character is really not likable.

The twisted approach, the twisted people, the superior protagonist, it has a very Japanese feel to it, quite twisted.

Damn, it looks like giving a weak girl the steel of her heart (๑˙ー˙๑)

The iron heart of a man of steel is faith and goal. As a minor, Hinayue believes that she can change when she becomes an adult, but now she still needs to be patient. The protagonist, because he can have basic food and clothing, naturally despises the heroine and thinks it is cowardly, Suppose, as an adult, you have an elder and a younger one, and your salary is only enough to support a family. When you face difficulties from your boss and colleagues, and you are not an indispensable figure, should your patience be defined as cowardice or strength? The protagonist's This approach is not self-righteous. Those who impose their own ideas on children and say that it is better to teach a man to fish than to teach him to fish. With a character like Hinazuki, without the murderer and the protagonist, he will not be humbled in the future because of the "cowardice" that the protagonist considers, and he will get rid of the shadow of his mother.

A very strange book with a very strange description of mentality. The protagonist is more like a childish pervert.

After reading Chapter 20, I wonder if this male protagonist is sick? He has an inexplicable superiority, but the things he does are emotionally sick.

Kanai

I feel like this kind of subject matter is not suitable for the current environment. There are so few people watching it.

Emmmmm, the protagonist stands from a high angle and helps the girl in what he thinks is right. It is very twisted. I always feel that there is something wrong with the three views and is distorted, but it is not that distorted.