You Told Me to Be a Lawyer, So Why Are They All Defendants?

To be honest, I'm worried about the author's safety. It's really fun to write. If you really want to do something, it's not just a name.

The daily guide came in and just tied it. The following book review: 1. Before it was put on the shelves, the parallel interweaving of multiple threads looked very messy. After it was put on the shelves, it was changed to a case-live broadcast-daily mode. The perception skyrocketed, and new readers can tolerate it. 2. The protagonist is systematic, has a low sense of presence, has little effect, is not outrageous but is sufficient. 3. It is not a brainless and refreshing article, the legal writing is quite standardized (although I can't see it), and it is a bit refreshing, although the writing may not be refreshing enough for the general relationship. 4. The protagonist has upright views and is strong enough to stand up for justice at home, even though he is a lawless lunatic. 5. There is currently no female protagonist (the author is hesitant after hearing advice). 6. There are many typos, such as four groomsmen, one dead and four injured, the year is written as noodle, the year is written as n, etc. (According to the standard of some authors offering a reward of 50 cents for each typo, I can eat a Shaxian meal until the tie is reached). It is recommended to join the group to beat him. 7. The author recently promised to guarantee 5 chapters a day without special circumstances, and did not suggest entering the group to smoke him. 8. This author is good at breaking chapters. It is recommended to join the group and beat him.

Little knowledge: To watch the flag-raising in Tiananmen Square, you need to make a reservation one day in advance.

That, sometimes I feel like I'm watching a pirated version. There seems to be a section missing between the end of the chapter and the beginning of the chapter, but it can be connected. Very twisted

Many cases in reality have achieved good results for the protagonist. Unfortunately, reality may not have such good results. When can the results in the novel be truly achieved?

I'm a little confused whether to read this novel or not. I'm a lawyer in real life. I'm afraid it will look like I'm working overtime and I can't help but find mistakes 😥

I feel like the people doing the barrage have a lot of dialogue, and I feel like the protagonist could write a short story and tell it more carefully every time he broadcasts live.

The name of the main character makes me nervous. . . .

The problem is that it is too jumpy and does not describe the causes and consequences, and some places are not overly covered.

The writing is very good, but I always feel that it is a little bit wrong, it is too bland, and there is no online text, which should be more refreshing.