The Flock of Pigeons

"Recommended Copywriting" If you like to be critical or read science fiction literary works with your brain, and like to criticize the author's scientific literacy. So, this is a science fiction literary work that retains the depth of scientific facts cited in the text, and its content involves complex systems, quantum field theory and scientific philosophy - I believe it is your best choice when choosing hard science fiction novels to read. "Work information" Book title: "Pigeons" Author: A Milk Fish Type: Science Fiction·Interstellar Civilization Tag: Hard Science Fiction Popular Science Physics Word Count: 180,000 words Status: Serial Recommendation Index: ★★★★☆ (4/5) "Brief Description of the Work" The first volume of the novel is narrated from the first-person perspective of the protagonist Fang Cheng, telling the story of the protagonist Fang Cheng, a physics student, who destroys and saves the world after accidentally bumping into a beautiful girl. "Reason for Recommendation" The author referred to many documents and books for the popular science part of this novel, and through the author's rigorous writing attitude and complete retention of the depth of scientific facts, he finally created this hard science fiction work that blends the author's accumulated science fiction ideas over the years. The complex systems, quantum field theory (supersymmetry, BRST transformation, Fermi field) and related discussions of scientific philosophy involved in the novel all demonstrate the author's serious attitude towards literary creation. In the author's words, this is a science fiction novel that is very suitable for readers who "like to be critical or read science fiction with their brains and criticize the author's scientific literacy." In order to ensure the rigor of the scientific facts in the text and provide interested readers with some extended reading materials, the author chose to simultaneously publish literature and books related to the scientific content in the text in the "Works Related" section of the book for readers to refer to. "Recommended Group" ❶Readers who like hard science fiction novels; ❷Readers who like to pursue the rigor of novels; ❸Readers who like science fiction literature and have scientific literacy. "Similar Recommendations" ❶"Death on Mars" Tianrui Shufu; ❷"The Last Human in the Universe" Rainbow Gate; ❸"Supernatural Incident Investigation Notes" Nebula Luoyanyu. {"TopicId":"847235287436099584","TopicName":"New book trial reading"}

Seeking refinement, if you are reading this book for the pursuit of hard science fiction, then congratulations on finding the perfect answer at the starting point.

After reading a few chapters, I feel that the author's writing style should be finished and published by a publishing house. Most readers at Qidian like to read cool articles that don't have to use their brains. There shouldn't be many people who can read this style.

Friends, friends, thank you all for your support, this book has received the second round of recommendations. The critical moment that determines the fate of this book has arrived! If you want to support me, I don't ask you for money or votes, I just ask you to click on the latest chapter of the text update (no matter what the content is) and read it all. This data is very important! Thank you all! You are my eldest brother if you read 🙏 Of course, it is better to be able to vote, and the one who votes is also my eldest brother.

It's such a shame, it's a good book, but since one of the female characters lacked guilt for the disaster she caused and was more curious about the creations of the alien allies who came to aid, I couldn't read it. The more beautiful and lovely the previous description was, the more I feared her weak sense of morality at this moment. I couldn't pretend like nothing happened like this female character, so I gave up the book and recommended this book to my classmates in the morning, which was a pity.

A truly hard science fiction work may be the science fiction with the hardest starting point. This book is indeed a "collection of ideas" as the author himself said in the article, but these ideas are very naturally integrated into the text, and many of them even exist as clues to the story. If technology is the skeleton, then the content is the flesh and blood. The science and literature in this book are perfectly combined, and there will be no sense of separation or forced insertion in reading. Instead, it will make people a little excited because of various foreshadowings and references. In short, if you are disappointed with the hard science fiction from Qidian, this book will rekindle your hope. So far, I give it full marks.

Almost all the character names in this book have meanings, and you can take a guess. Also, the "real milk fish" in the chapter review is me. I don't know why the two names are different.

A science fiction major with a background in science, the author's detailed professional knowledge makes this article rigorous and informative. It can be seen from the references of the small paper that it is very trustworthy in terms of the rigor of the setting, especially in the field of physics. The thorns I can pick out are basically biology and philosophy. The biggest highlight of this article is that the author did not arbitrarily adopt science fiction concepts that are already well-known to the public in classic science fiction works and science fiction-themed film and television games. Instead, he used his own theoretical background to re-examine these concepts and gave a lot of high-density original science fiction ideas. Naturally, these original ideas have also withstood the author's nitpicking. Therefore, I highly recommend this work to readers who are dissatisfied with the seriousness of previous science fiction novels, and to authors who want to create science fiction novels and collect some novel and rigorous ideas. In addition, the author's writing style is also good, the style is relatively close to the publication, especially in describing the catastrophic big scenes and some details of character interaction. Of course, as this is the author's first book, the author's writing is still relatively immature. Personally, I feel that this is especially reflected in the rhythm and grasp of the overall situation. The main points are these (the following contains some spoilers): 1. The author seems not good at creating tension. The disaster caused by the protozoa in the second volume should have been a very urgent event. However, as book friends have pointed out, the author's large sections of science popularization and character interactions have greatly weakened the sense of tension. It basically makes people feel that it is the end of the world and they are still reading and walking leisurely. Personally, I felt that only the part where the aliens started arranging plans and Ome's return was sped up. 2. Similarly, after the stage is separated from the campus, the interpersonal relationships in this book have not actually changed except for the aliens. The author actually shaped this situation very cleverly: the disasters caused by alien technology and protozoa are too much beyond human civilization, so they have become a noise background that has nothing to do with the overall situation. However, this galgame-style character list also allows the author to follow the campus-like narrative tone and interactive style of the first volume. In my opinion, this style is slightly inconsistent with the later big stage due to different focus: the former focuses more on people's growth and experience, while the latter focuses on surprising science fiction ideas and shocking scenes. 3. In terms of the overall layout, my current feeling is that the main plot is actually relatively simple, and the suspense design... Is basically absent. Most of the time, I am waiting to see what sci-fi ideas the author can come up with. The original body disaster could have been a suspense, but due to the above reasons... The latest chapters have solved the new suspense about the origin of living things. To make matters worse, the author, who is a doctor, is very busy and can only update 2k a day. Many of these 2k are allocated to science popularization, gal interaction and tribute jokes. As a result, the author seems to choose to post a little water heater from time to time to maintain readers' interest in reading... Of course, for readers who like it, the biggest highlights mentioned above are enough to outweigh this series of flaws. I hope the author will get better and better as he writes. Finally, let me share the thorns I can pick ( 1. It seems philosophically inappropriate to use the concept of "instinct" to describe the protozoa. As a creation designed by the male and female protagonists, the protozoa has no evolutionary history. The default configuration of the design can only be understood as "instinct", but the design of the male and female protagonists is The dynamics of the human brain, why can it have the "instinct" of metal creatures... Or it can be said that the male and female protagonists only designed a framework with a dynamic mechanism similar to the human brain, from which metal intelligence emerged, but it is quite strange that this thing that emerged later is called "instinct" in concept... 2. Jupiter The term "cephalopod" on the second page is strange to today's evolutionary tree taxonomy. Today's phylogeny requires that x is a cephalopod if and only if x is on the evolutionary branch of the cephalopod ancestor. This means that the evolutionary ancestor of the cephalopod traveled through the interstellar space and came to Europa... Or we have to go back to Linnaeus. Taxonomy, use essence to define "cephalopods". Or, we can stick to phylogeny but deny the existing evolutionary tree theory. In fact, Europa cephalopods and terrestrial cephalopods are really a monophyletic group... But how observer No. 1 Can see this evolutionary history at a glance seems to pose a problem.

Only the first volume is in first person! ! This is something I have seriously considered. I feel that the first person version is inappropriate. I suggest you read the first volume and see the effect.

This book is indeed science fiction and has the flavor of classical science fiction. In addition, it is recommended that the author write a chapter on popular science nouns. Because some readers are too lazy to check Baidu.