Warlords of the Witcher World

A hegemony book that should be placed in the historical division rather than the fantasy division. This book only borrows the wizard's world view and the situation of the character world, focusing on politics and military affairs. Those who want to see the protagonist use his extraordinary strength to defeat the sorceress crazily against ten thousand people should detour as soon as possible.

Let me express my thoughts. I see that there are always comments that worry that the protagonist's portal gun will be copied by the Empire, and then the Empire will rely on its own size to crush the protagonist, but this is actually something that you don't need to worry about at all. First of all, the protagonist is already developing flintlock guns. By the time the empire begins to imitate the fire portal gun on a large scale, the protagonist is almost equipped with flintlock guns. In terms of loading, range and ease of operation, the flintlock gun completely beats the fire portal gun. Secondly, compared to the people in this world, the protagonist's biggest treasure is that he knows how technology will develop in the future. In the world of demon hunters, technology may require several generations of trial and error. The protagonist already knows (or probably knows) the relatively correct path. (For example, after clicking on the flintlock gun, you can start working on smokeless gunpowder, then click on the breech-loading gun, click on the fixed-load ammunition, and after the smokeless gunpowder is researched, you can click on the level of firearms before World War I, etc.) Finally, what the protagonist should do at this stage is to first create the prototype of the assembly line and transform the backward workshops into early factories (such as forging hammers that use other forces, improving furnaces, etc.). This is the foundation that can completely open up the productivity of other feudal lords.

I just read the first few chapters, and I couldn't see anything at first. After the protagonist was sent out to gather the remaining soldiers, the writing was like a running account. Many places were too bland and there were no transitions. There was basically no detailed description of the battle process. Basically, what methods each side had in turn. Use it once, then see what effect it has, and finally list the battle results. I don't know how it is written later, but the two ambush battles the protagonist is fighting and the onlookers' battle are all written like this. This battle description is more passionate than this when I look for any placement mini-game and watch the character hang up.

I really don't understand. Are you writing about guns and guns in the magical world? Aren't you just trying to purify readers and make them disgusting? Don't you see how many people have given up reading because of your gun?

The most unreasonable thing about the wizarding world is its attitude towards extraordinary people and the performance of witchers. If we say that the warlocks and witchers in it are all led by nobles and are discriminated against, it is incredible that a few idiots dare to mock people who can kill them at will. There is also the performance of witchers. A lot of people here say that Geralt was stabbed to death with a pitchfork and that witchers can't beat a few soldiers. So the training and transformation of the witcher are all fake. Geralt being stabbed by a pitchfork only shows that the transformation of the witcher is not enough to ignore weapons, and Geralt does not wear heavy armor. The physical fitness of witchers is several times that of ordinary people. With a little training, they can crush ordinary people. It is amazing that the king has not conducted in-depth research on witchers in the world of wizards. They have long lifespans, are resistant to poisons, have strong recovery power, and have good physical fitness. The disadvantage is that they are infertile. If they support research to remove the disadvantage of infertility, then the king can rule for hundreds more years per capita. Isn't that cool?

The previous article is good, but I just saw that the protagonist married a daughter and gave all the weapons and troops to the father-in-law to fight in the war. At this point, the reader should have lost more than half, and the results will not be better later. The father-in-law's family is very powerful. If he wins the battle, the protagonist will have no say. The protagonists have already developed artillery, why are they still marrying each other? We should watch the two sides fighting to see which side is weak and support the other side to make war fortune, strengthen ourselves, and then both sides will suffer losses in the fight, and then they will all be annexed. We should learn from the American imperialism. This is the plot that readers want to see. I withdrew first.

This book definitely takes the hegemony route, which is indeed fine for the original wizard. The sorceress looks awesome and coaxes her, but in fact, as long as the ruler is willing, everyone can be burned on the rack; the demon hunter looks like the sun is rising, but in fact, he cannot hold two pitchforks; the monsters are stragglers and there is nothing to worry about; the Wild Hunt has something, but the fight is nothing more than an army against each other, and any country with strong enough power can fight. But cpdr let himself go in the DLC and created two things that were seriously out of specification—Mirror Master and Shadow Elder. What should we do with these two things?

This is a map of the northern part of the Witcher world made by the University of Warsaw, which is used as one of the main map references in this book.

Sword and Sorcery became . . . Line up to be shot. . Speechless. It has become a historical document

Regardless of whether the other parts are well written or not, I would be put off just by the protagonist getting out the musket. If the fantasy world came up with guns so quickly, wouldn't everyone else be suppressed by technology and die? Demon hunters and mages would also die when surrounded by soldiers with guns. Not to mention that with muskets, machine guns and cannons would definitely appear in the past. Because it is impossible for other lords, nobles, kings and mages to be so stupid and not study guns. The damage power of guns is too abnormal to compare. So logically, the world of witchers will turn into a world of guns. Then what kind of fantasy world is there, unless those kings and mages are forced to turn a blind eye to such a powerful weapon?

Oh my god, the name is a bit low. How about writing the name of the world instead of the warlord of the Witcher world? It's so low.

The name really sounds that way, why not replace the warlord with the emperor?

I've never understood why ordinary people dare to mock witchers. In reality, a two-meter-tall man is in front of you. Do you dare to laugh at him? This is still a society governed by the rule of law.

Kajia

It's not even published, so where does the traffic come from, and where do the top readers come from. If it's just for a niche audience, then I have nothing to say. There will always be a small number of people who like it.

It feels like the protagonist is about to overturn. How can a mortal resist the destructive weapons created by the warlock? Fast forward to the time when the protagonist escaped because of the magic gold, and all his troops were destroyed. After escaping back, he was beheaded by the king, G! (It's time to upgrade your personal force, otherwise it's too brittle. Even if you hire a warlock to protect you, your own warlocks who can help are still making inventions in their lair...)

I can only give it 5 points out of 10. It doesn't feel like a novel, but more like a narrative. There is no dialogue in many places, and it is just mentioned in one stroke. It feels neither immersive nor confusing. The second feeling is that I simply rely on the wizarding world to write lord articles. In fact, except for countries, most places have no content about the wizarding world at all. Friends who like to watch adventures or original novels & games may be a little disappointed.

I can't stand the part about becoming a son-in-law. The author writes that the protagonist is cowardly and a dog-licker. I can't stand it. Some people think that they are not dog-lickers, but he is a dog-licker.

It is recommended to remove the Sword and Magic label, and simply start with a system that sends nuclear weapons and Star Destroyers. Two chapters are enough to push the world forward.

There is a reason why he has two million-word books but is still a third-level author. The writing style is dry and dry, and there is basically no scene description and detailed shaping. Obsessed with Slavic culture and history, after the first book Ancient Rus' Hegemony hit the street, the second book took on the skin of a demon hunter and continued to write about the rise of the Cossacks, not even willing to change the name... Just over a dozen chapters in, when the protagonist has not yet stabilized his qualifications for hegemony, he can't wait to get out the firearms. What's next? Steam engine? Railway? Seeing that it is about to be released, there are almost no features of the Witcher world. It can basically be read as a Slavic historical text

The genetic disease in the protagonist's family is a curse, which just offsets the plague curse. This unexpected setting is outrageous. Then a badge obtained on the prairie showed divine power, and he used thunder to kill the monster spreading the plague. This sudden addition of settings to cheat is too forceful. 😅 Deliberately putting the protagonist into a completely unnecessary danger, and then using a sudden increase in settings to reverse the situation is too outrageous. I don't know why I wrote this. If it slips away like this later, I might as well write a protagonist with a golden finger.

I feel that the author's concept of war in the cold weapon period is too shallow. The first few chapters made me feel a little numb. The main thing is that at the beginning, the commander sent the protagonist to fight guerrillas in the forest. The protagonist led a group of 100 people. The footprints and marching marks were very obvious, but the man in black didn't notice that the protagonist was nearby. The protagonist did not mention sending scouts to explore. In fact, guerrilla warfare relies on the familiarity of the terrain and the strength of the scouts. The protagonist is a hundred-man regiment with poor coordination and few capable people, facing a team of men in black who are ready to kill the deer-headed demon. The men in black scouts must be spread over a large area of ​​the forest and must occupy high points. I don't know how the protagonist ambush. If I insist that the ambush can be successful, I can only look at it without thinking. After reading this paragraph, I realized that the author had no concept of cold weapon warfare and relied entirely on games to support it? Such content is really unsustainable and meaningless.

In 1216, it took the French army half a month to attack a castle, and there were only 13 soldiers inside! But in the novel, the protagonist has hundreds of soldiers but he can't hold on for even one day. It's really unbearable.

The author clings to his own history of ancient Russia. In a different world, the protagonist is a knight and still hangs out with Cossacks.

You shouldn't be called a warlord, you should be called a dog for others

In fact, being extraordinary is not very necessary. The kings and nobles of the wizarding world do not have extraordinary powers, but the warlocks still have to listen to their orders.

Unless you have a background that can destroy the country, guns cannot exist. No one at the top wants civilians to have weapons that threaten them.

I've read a lot of Witcher 3 novels, why is this one so boring?

Moreover, the protagonist, as a cruel oppressor of a group of advanced productive forces such as wizards, and as an invader who wantonly massacred non-human races with a longer history of residence, Hitler II, was able to die well...

Damn it? Chapter 25 is on the shelves? How? ? ?