Medieval Times: I Build a Manor in the Mountains

From surviving in the wilderness at the beginning, to gradually expanding the population, and then to conquering the outside world. Every step is done steadily, with nothing explosive or unreasonable (some people from this world are so capable, many buildings were built very quickly) The sense of immersion is very strong, I have seen more than 130 of them so far, great book!

In the Middle Ages, why did you open up wasteland in my territory?

Author, you should write (Desert Island Survival)! ! In the Middle Ages, there is no golden finger, the protagonist is a serf, you have no chance to protect the protagonist from death, and there is no opportunity for development. As long as you give the protagonist a barony and let the protagonist be born into a noble family, your book can continue to be written. You have already said that it is the Middle Ages! The protagonist is an ordinary person. Do you think anyone will listen to the protagonist? Even a fool would not help the protagonist. There were so many openings like this in the Middle Ages. Do you think they have no countermeasures? Don't underestimate people! Those exploiting classes cannot be resisted by people like the protagonist who have no strength! The protagonist builds a residence in the mountains today, and it will be discovered by people entering the mountains tomorrow, or a month or a few months later. However, no matter if the protagonist must be alone, no one will die with the protagonist! Author, please take a good look at your background setting and see if your abilities are adequate. You will know that the best ending for the protagonist in this setting is to be a savage for the rest of his life! If you want to write well, I advise you to change to a desert island survival start. The protagonist plays alone for the rest of his life. Your reserve of themes will not be wasted, and you can attract some people and make some money! Otherwise, you give the protagonist a golden finger, and your story can start from the current world!

What, you want to challenge the entire European aristocracy by yourself? Without emancipating the mind and enriching the spirit, what is the use of a serf who is as numb as a puppet? If you dare to tell the serfs today that you are against the aristocracy to allocate land, they will bring the aristocratic grandpa to arrest you tomorrow.

This is originally the main point of the Lord's story, but the author seems to have little understanding of this aspect and just brushes it off. First of all, most castles in Europe were not built overnight, but developed step by step from infancy. The castle in the early stages of 1.0 Was a single tower, a longhouse, or even a mill. The longhouse was a tall stone building that could be defended on the roof, and the tower was a round or square tower. If you had money, you could build and heighten it. The 2.0 Castle is built with multiple towers and longhouses, and then relies on the main building to enclose courtyard walls and trenches. Furthermore, scaffolding can be arranged on the courtyard walls for defenders to stand on. A castle in 3.0 Must have three to four main buildings, and a large cover should be added to the courtyard. This is how the lord's hall came to be. This is why many indoor halls in Europe are called "patio" or "atrium". The 4.0 Castle is the castle in our general impression. It is based on the 3.0 Castle with the addition of outer city walls and gates, a small annex tower with an overhang on the main tower, and an air corridor between the towers.

Damn, I can't spray this. This author really was a serf in the Middle Ages.

Have you, a serf, ever been a lord? Some things are scribbled and taken for granted.

Refined borders, rivers, added new locations

Your emotional drama is too awkward. It should be less precise. I would rather you not write it. It is out of style.

I have already seen a series of jokes such as "The Stone Man with One Eye", "Green Ant New Fermented Wine", "My Sword is Not Bad", etc. In the future, you won't have to ask the priest to punch Charlie three times, right?

Putting aside the risks at the beginning, it is a bit like the text version of various pastoral life videos that were popular in the past, not to mention the Taoxi brothers. It looks like a Western fantasy Peach Blossom Spring. The protagonist develops from scratch, there is no system, and he is a serf. The land is not his own, and the people are not his. I liked Robinson Crusoe very much at the beginning. This is really good. Nowadays, Western Fantasy Farming starts with lords, and no matter how bad it is, there are also some peasant knights, etc. The protagonist of the Western Fantasy Farming style has the worst start. He has no system, no identity, no land, no one, no strength, and even the time travel is not a game novel. There can be information gaps. Although there are many forest resources, but there is a master, and it is a difficult start!

The two core points of this book are about fighting for hegemony. In fact, I think most of the people who like this book like farming articles. Today's society is too stressful and the characters are too complicated. Those who like to read novels may want to find a novel and read the pressure-free mountain life in the novel to find a kind of spiritual comfort instead of killing and killing all day long. I don't say who I represent. I only express myself as an idea? But you have to look at this book clearly. What do you rely on to attract this type of readers? For example, we are in our 30s, and we can say that we are already very irritable in life. In our spare time, we just want to see a quiet pastoral life, so that we can pursue the unattainable tranquility in the spiritual world. So the group of readers that your book started to attract may have given up when you started to compete for hegemony. Of course, I also understand that it is difficult to agree with one another. Some people like the tranquility of farming, while others like the passion of fighting for hegemony. But the author. Your book initially attracted people other than our group. Are you an old man who is struggling in reality and comes here to find a peaceful spiritual world? We are already over 20 years old and have passed that age where we like to compete for hegemony! Sorry, maybe I talked too much. . Because I really like the farming part of this book, so please forgive me for any mistakes.

I can't stand it anymore when I see that I have entered the system. Building a manor in the mountains is a way to take advantage of the system. Now I feel like I am being taken advantage of.

The author should write less about women. Your descriptions and plots of female characters are really hard to explain in one sentence 😅

I just read Chapter 120, which is generally okay, but the description of female characters is too consistent with the fantasy of medieval serfs, which is a bit disgusting.

How does it feel?

The protagonist's 50 levies (including 20 spearmen) vs. 20 Elite Nord soldiers During the battle, they were still in a confrontation. Nord's front row of shield soldiers is neatly arranged and cooperates closely with the rear archers. The shield soldiers can block the spears and the archers take the opportunity to kill. The protagonist, the pikeman, has lost his courage and hesitates to move forward. Then, the protagonist and an archer break into the formation, the archer shoots one person, and the protagonist leaps over the shield wall. The main corner horse pounced on the enemy commander Nord's chosen warrior, killing him with one blow. Then, you told me that the Nord warriors simply surrendered? 😒😒😒😒 Don't be too outrageous, okay. Is the gap between the death of your commander and the surrender of the enemy team too large? Is there a few steps missing in the middle? Moreover, judging from the situation on the battlefield when picking up the station, it was the protagonist's large army that was defeated first. The protagonist's deserters moved to their positions to hold on, while the other side was the pursuer. I'm just assuming that all these Nord warriors are him? Mom is a waste and a coward. The battlefield commander will surrender as soon as he dies. Then your surrender process must also include the following processes: The protagonist steps on the battlefield and kills the generals. The enemy troops are shocked and come to a temporary halt. The morale of our own conscripts is boosted and they charge bravely. The morale of the enemy's shield soldiers was greatly reduced, and the levy troops broke the formation. Some of the enemy's personnel turned and fled. The protagonist's troops fought bravely to kill the enemy and shouted to surrender their guns. Then, some enemy personnel abandoned their weapons and knelt down to surrender. Hey guys, are you playing a game? Just kill the opponent's team commander, but the enemy team didn't even break the formation, and the opponent surrendered directly? No one even followed the biological nature and turned around and ran away. They were all rational people. They all knew that "our commander was beheaded by the opposite commander. We can't win, and we can't run away. We have no choice but to surrender." Then they all surrendered rationally. Absolutely awesome!

Do you have to write about a lord's wife who takes care of the baby? You're making me afraid to watch it later. It's better to write a classic character like the countess in distress and use it to develop the plot.

Adding plant ash to leather is not tanning, but hair removal, which will only turn it into leather, not fur. Also in the Middle Ages, Eastern and Western farmers would compost. Although it was not systematic, farmers' sensitivity to soil fertility is really not comparable to that of modern urbanites. In the ancient "Essentials for Qi Min" (6th century), there is a complete composting technology: dung, grass, and ash are accumulated in layers, watered to maintain humidity, and covered with soil to prevent odor. In ancient Europe, there are Roman "On Agriculture" and medieval monastery agricultural books, which all have records of "dung and grass accumulating and rotting".

Why is such a good book so bad? Why are those idiotic novels still on the list?

I have a suggestion, why not call him Link? There are two reasons. First, it can make people who play Zelda smile, and maybe attract some people; second, it can increase the sense of substitution. Link and Link have different feelings of substitution in the Western background, and the degree of drama is also different; last point, if the name has special meaning to the author, homophony does not hurt.

It's just that the writing is too clumsy. Just one title can be over a hundred words long. The space for farming is getting less and less, and it's hard to see the development of the territory.

Like the title, I have been raising it for a long time, please ask Shen Nong

I read it directly from the back, and I was a little confused. At first I looked at the title of this novel, and I thought it was really the Middle Ages on Earth. But then I saw it was a Western world view in another world. Then I saw elements of Knight Rider 2, and then I found elements of medieval Warhammer. There are so many elements that are stitched together. Does this novel have a transcendent system?

There are too few discussion posts. Old bookworms generally don't consider reading this kind of thing because they are afraid of pitfalls. If the author greatly increases the number of discussion posts, the book's performance will be better, and the writing is not bad.

It's pretty, but I have to make a widow

It's been a long time since I've seen something well written in this genre.

Warhammer Total War? Will the protagonist join the group alone?

For example, this section of the book says that Hetou Village is located between Raven Territory and Vulture Castle. Look at what the map shows. The river system is also wrong. Can the author upload the accurate map he used when writing the novel? The draft can also be used.

It's wonderfully written and interesting, but it doesn't seem to be very popular.