I’m Really Not the Living King of Hell

It is a good idea to use reality as the background. When the target turns to political entities in the later stage, you can consider using systemic financial risks as the consequences of concern. For example, a few days ago Silicon Valley Bank was operating honestly to buy U. S. Bonds but went bankrupt.

I can't see anything new. A routine has been repeated over and over again. There was a chance to change it, but I gave up. Obviously saving people can get more rewards, but if they can't be saved, the protagonist will go through a process. Who, who, and what happened, the protagonist replies, and then he dies. It's probably the food-level, and the poison point is. No, there are very few exciting points, no explosive points, and it doesn't express any thoughts or thinking. There is not enough core in it. It is pure fast food literature. I want to summarize it a little more, but there is nothing to summarize. Why do I write an article? It is probably to commemorate the 500 points I lost.

In fact, if it is so effective, the protagonist will not survive for three days. Those who are rich and powerful will never allow beings beyond their control, let alone life, even if there is the slightest suspicion, they will be killed.

Isn't this naming method studio writing?

I'm not a rich person, but I ordered them all, so I'll take a screenshot to explain. This book seems really eye-catching at the beginning, but after chapter 80, I felt particularly uncomfortable, especially when the eyes of the world are focused on the protagonist every day. As a business owner, you can also write about interesting things you encountered while traveling in various parts of the country to reconcile the plot. You say this novel is enjoyable, but it has no climax. The plot of the overseas trip was really embarrassing, and the more I read, the more uncomfortable I felt. Maybe this is not my favorite style. I will just read this, and wish the author a prosperous future.

As for the protagonist paying attention to someone who has a problem, once, twice, or even ten times. If you think it is coincidence or bad luck, it is okay, but knowing the latest updated chapter, it must be at least thirty times, right? However, the protagonist still insists that there is nothing wrong with him and it is just a coincidence. However, even after experiencing things like time travel and systems, he still stubbornly denied that there was nothing wrong with him. You must know that among the people he pays attention to, there are not always high-risk people who are scanned by the system, there are low-risk people, and there are even people who have not been scanned, but something went wrong. This happened several times and I could barely call it a coincidence, but it happened so many times that the protagonist never thought that there was something wrong with him. Or was there something wrong with the system? This makes me feel that there must be something wrong with the protagonist's brain, or his thinking is controlled by the system or something.

Personally, I think it's a bit too brainless. At least don't write anything related to culture and have the least respect. Otherwise, something could easily happen

The rest of the article is too boring and keeps talking about politics crazily. It can be seen that the author is a person who advocates populism.

As expected of the real King of Hell, Sister Zhou immediately became cold

The character design of the main character is too poor. I use the system and feel that the system is rubbish. Just like the male protagonist of a rubbish online drama, I feel that the male protagonist has a paralyzed face and is not very good at talking.