
Raising Livestock in the Three Kingdoms
我在三国养牲口
- Status
- Completed
- Length
- 1.2M Words
- Genre
- Gaming
- Subgenre
- Game Otherworld
- Updated
- 3y ago
- English
- Request a translation
Synopsis
Stats
475Chapters
8.6kRecommendations
42.5kFans
More by this author
In booklists 3
A List of Books That Leave Me at a Loss for Words
A good read
23Books25Follows1yUpdated
Silver's Personal Reading List
Books I personally like.
10Books8Follows3yUpdated
A Veteran Reader's Heartfelt Recommendations
Heartfelt recommendations from a reader with 15 years of experience
12Books2Follows3yUpdated
Readers also read
Among the Stars: Lord of the Star Sea
Lord's Farming: The Gods' Game
The Disaster Player in the Civilization Game
From a Blank-Slate Player to the God of Machines
In the Americas, From Security Guard to Call of Duty
God-Tier Group Chat: Three Kingdoms
The Unorthodox Three Kingdoms
A Literary Master in Ancient Greece
League of Legends: Being an Honest Support Is Boring, Isn't It?
The Grand Strategists' Alliance
Lord: A Copy of Water Margin from the Start
Three Kingdoms: The Great Strategist of Ji Han
Reader comments 28
Google Translate
















Having roughly finished watching, I think the author's use of "livestock" has two meanings. One is the literal meaning, which also serves to highlight the protagonist's talent. The second meaning is that the subject of this "livestock" has evolved from animals to the Han people, where "livestock" is no longer a derogatory term but rather a word describing someone as "awesome" or "powerful," used to better portray the Han people as "livestock."
It overturned my understanding of "ancient times," and I couldn't even find a way to refute it. I just felt like something was wrong, but I couldn't quite put my finger on it.
The author feels that your writing has strayed a bit from the title's focus on raising livestock; you haven't written much about it.
The subject matter and ideas are fine, but the writing style is overly explanatory, which affects the reading experience.
I found the Three Kingdoms storyline quite enjoyable, but the later part about the revival of spiritual energy became less appealing.
The recommendation of those who were filial and incorruptible was based on the fact that their fathers lived separately; the recommendation of those who were talented was based on the fact that they were illiterate. This couldn't possibly be a custom brought by the Xiongnu. The author seems to have downplayed some of the shortcomings of Han aristocratic families.
At first, I thought the author was just writing nonsense, but now I realize I was completely unaware. I think the author's approach actually makes sense. 😅
This is the first time I've seen these historical accounts of the impact of selling official positions on the lower and middle classes. It seems quite interesting. This makes me wonder about the difference between the "laissez-faire" attitude of minor officials and poor families in the article and the "laissez-faire" attitude of young people in reality. I'm curious about the root cause of the term "laissez-faire."
The history of the Three Kingdoms
During the reign of Emperor Wu of Han, the Han army launched a northern expedition against the Xiongnu, who suffered a major defeat. In response, the Xiongnu disposed of corpses in rivers to pollute the water. They also lacquered horse dung on arrows to infect the Han army.
Are you serious about this introduction? Are you just going to let it continue to split apart? To become divided?