
Journey to the West: The True Lord Yin Tiger
西游之寅虎真君
- Status
- Completed
- Length
- 1.1M Words
- Genre
- Xianxia
- Subgenre
- Mythic Cultivation
- Updated
- 3y ago
- English
- Request a translation
Synopsis
Stats
368Chapters
3.5kRecommendations
57.1kFans
More by this author
In booklists 1
Readers also read
The Sword Immortal of Emei, Mount Shu
I Prove the Dao Fruit Through Two Worlds
An Ancient Cultivator's Handbook for Refining Demons
Reporting to the Motherland: I've Mastered the Technology of Mechanical Ascension
In the Americas, From Security Guard to Call of Duty
Journey to the West: Deducing the Path to Immortality from a Willow Tree
Strange Tales: The Toad Immortal
A Literary Master in Ancient Greece
League of Legends: Being an Honest Support Is Boring, Isn't It?
Reborn as a Demon, I Cultivated into a True Dragon
The Great Sage Who Sealed the Gods
Journey to the West: The Treasure Vase of the Great Dao
Reader comments 28
Google Translate










Originally, Journey to the West was a righteous and honorable story, praising the spirit of justice, fearlessness, and courageous struggle. Since the various interpretations emerged, another kind of interpretation has appeared, such as a reverse interpretation of Journey to the West. At first, it felt quite novel, giving people a refreshing and exciting feeling.
The merit system in this book feels awkward. Monsters who eat people gain merit when killed by the protagonist, but what about humans who eat animals? Are animals just born to be eaten? So far, all merit in this book is earned by helping humans. Humans gain merit by helping others, and monsters gain merit by killing other monsters. Basically, as long as you're on the side of humans, you get merit…
How crooked must this protagonist's butt be?
Honestly, does the protagonist even understand his own position? He's a demon, so his stance is clearly on the side of the demon race. He gets merit for killing man-eating demons, but does killing bad guys get merit? What kind of merit is it? If it's human merit, then giving him merit for killing man-eating demons seems a bit odd—he's a tiger demon!
Using the backdrop of the prehistoric era, the Demon Court is a defeated party; using the backdrop of Journey to the West, the Heavenly Court, as the legitimate authority of the Three Realms, is so useless—it's simply illogical.
Is this protagonist the reincarnation of the God King Tang San? You thought it was immoral to kill the rabbit demon that ate people, so what's with you eating the rabbit demon yourself?
This is really ridiculous. The initial setup is flawed. Why isn't it a story about a demon incarnated? I finally found a novel about demons, only to discover it's another story with human values and a demonic body used to portray a human. Those who argue with me about merit, and those who say the protagonist's past life was human, that's nonsense too.
What's the fox spirit's job? Don't tell me the fox is actually a woman later on; that would be a major flaw. Even if she is a woman, the way the male lead and the fox acted so gay before their identities were revealed was already unbearable to watch.
There's nothing to see after leaving Yinshan. 1. They brought a male fox to the roadside to beg for a title, and after they got it, they made it follow them around, calling them "brother" and "little brother" in a disgusting way. Later, it seems the fox spirit offended someone by saying something inappropriate.
Currently, it seems there are only two points that differ slightly. 1. Hu Liu's role is too awkward. It feels like the author wanted to position the fox as a partner and follower, but as the only member of the protagonist's tour group, Hu Liu's role and function are too low. He is only useful for telling jokes, making fun and acting cute.
They were already looking up to the heavens, and then they started plagiarizing! Sigh, what's wrong with Qidian authors? Aren't you just trying to make money? Why does your writing get worse and worse after it's published? If you wrote well, you'd earn more, and we'd be happy reading it, wouldn't we?