NBA: The Peak Shark, Ruling the Paint!

It's so cool. If you like cool articles, you can come and read it. Come on, author. Recently, there are all those passionate books about basketball. The protagonist's talent is very poor. He relies on the system to climb up little by little. I don't understand why James Jordan's talent is so good. Our protagonist's talent must be average. I came to read the book to read this?

What is this about? Iverson and Duncan, similar protagonists to the Sharks, are competing for the No. 1 Pick? Are they worthy? Do you really know how to write the word "basketball"?

To be honest, if O'Neal had the ability to shoot free throws at his peak, it would be nothing like the bullshit of the small ball era. Standing alone under the basket, no one can attack. If he attacks the paint alone, no one can defend him. He can't stand it in the small ball era. It's useless to draw fouls.

The peak Shark can only draw fouls, but with Dayao's free throws, there is no solution.

Why do some people praise Chamberlain's 100 points? Have you actually checked the records of that game? That game was so ugly that four people would rather not score than give the ball to Chamberlain so that he could bully the opponent's inside line, which was less than two meters away. Moreover, the score in that game was simply the ultimate expression of explosive penalty power. Compared with Chamberlain, Harden's style of play is much better-looking and smoother. It's really hard to imagine that the statistics of professional players in the 1950s who relied on their bodies to bully semi-professionals or even amateur players could be blown away?

Does O'Neal need a three-pointer? He just needs to shoot free throws. O'Neal is invincible if he can shoot free throws.

You said that centers are withering away, but you said that he entered the league in 1996. If you write that entering the league in 13 to 15 years, it would be much better than entering in 1995. At that time, it was an era before the small ball era was about to rise. The protagonist entered the league and delayed the small ball era for more than ten years.

You've really downplayed the basketball practitioners. I can't stand it anymore.

When I saw O'Neal from 1996 being used as the protagonist, I just felt that the author wanted to express how much the protagonist was favored by Jerry West. Seeing that Kidd + Kobe + draft picks were exchanged for Iverson later, I can only say that Jerry West did the transaction as the author described, so what was in his mind was definitely not water, but shit. The first is O'Neal in his mature stage in 1996. O'Neal is about to reach his peak at the age of 24. Just exchange for a rookie center who has never played in the NBA, and add some extras. This deal is really going to grandma's house. Today, it would be equivalent to taking Curry Durant, who had just finished his rookie contract, and exchanging it for the No. 1 Pick that year, plus his own draft pick. This operation may have just been signed, and the person was fired by the boss. You can completely trade O'Neal for the protagonist + draft picks + 76ers role players or stars. As for the loss, you can exchange it like that? Okay, it can be said that the protagonist is changed. I can't figure out the later exchange of Kidd + Kobe + draft picks for Iverson. Iverson is not the protagonist. He has plug-ins given by the author and can grow infinitely. Is Kobe so much worse than Iverson? You also need to add Kidd and draft picks to exchange. Just pick up the omission and replace it with Kobe and Kidd, forming the protagonist version of O'Neal + Kidd + Kobe, add some role players, and add a strong sixth man, and you can compete for the championship in the first year.

After watching about 30 pictures, I feel that Luo Li is awkward, slutty and often embarrassed!