Apocalypse Game: I Can See the Hints

The team doesn't feel like they get along. Why are the villains more loyal to their leader? Equality doesn't work for Apocalypse. In real society, a company must have a clear leader. Being too good to people in Apocalypse can lead to supercilious behavior.

It's really hard to write about bringing a family with you.

The description of the team is not deep enough. According to normal logic, the protagonist is calm, strong, and can share cakes. He is better than Chen Feng, who is only a hindrance and has few superpowers. It feels like he is always fighting for control of the team.

With the protagonist's ability, wouldn't it be more enjoyable to live alone? Isn't it more comfortable to grab a female slave or something when you're lonely than to be forced to be a nanny if you have to live or die? The most outrageous thing is that others don't appreciate it, it's the end of the world, and what if I kill the most powerful person directly? Can they survive without the protagonist? If you don't feel comfortable writing, don't write too hard.

How to put it this way, in the doomsday novel, I feel that it is better for the protagonist to fight alone in the early stage, which is much more enjoyable. The subordinates or the heroine can be arranged later. I think the early stage of a post-apocalyptic story is really important. If you arrange a bunch of family members, relatives, or even close friends, the plot will always feel very dragging, and the rhythm will not be up to speed. Readers will find it boring and don't want to read it. The number of readers will decrease. The author will not be able to continue writing, and no one will read it. The author will definitely have no motivation to write. Why many Qidian novels like, "Parents sacrifice to heaven, their magic power is boundless", one: to reduce the number of important supporting characters. If you think about your parents, brothers and sisters, relatives, and friends, these people need more opportunities to appear in the protagonist's life, and more words and inks are needed to describe the characters. It is better to do more than to do less to portray you well. If you do not describe it well, the reader will backhand you. Second: If the post-apocalyptic text contains family members, try to keep it to a minimum. If possible, it would be best if it is a younger sister. It is best not to write anything else (from a certain LSP). Because this kind of text is gray and dark in style and contains a lot of people I know, I feel that there will be some style incompatibility. Why is Qidian called "Qidian Orphanage"? It's not just a plot with a good start and well-written arrangements, but no need to arrange too many supporting characters (parents, brothers, sisters, relatives and friends). But it also feels like an endless loop. The author wants to write more, longer, and longer, but there must be more to write. Then the characters should be arranged. Well, there are things that can be watered down... Well, I wrote it, but I didn't describe the characters well. This is a poisonous point. If there are too many poisonous points, no one will like to read it. A book that comes and goes once and twice will die. (My own point of view, no wonder if I don't like it)

Eight novels are still written like this, come into the factory!

Recently, there have been more and more atavistic articles from Qidian, which is a good thing! It's been a long time since I've seen this kind of post-apocalyptic article about killing zombies and exploding crystal cores. Although there are many details that are not worth scrutinizing, I'm looking forward to it

Speaking of what the Death Scythe is, I can smell the manuscripts being deposited. Robbery. The author should send out all the manuscripts as soon as possible (>_<)

The author's subsequent superpower was a failure. You've already given me a hint on what to do in advance.

In the last days, it is better for people to learn to be more selfish. If you do not take the initiative to harm others, it is the greatest kindness. If you can save others conveniently, it is the greatest kindness. Team up with strangers? How can human nature stand the test?