Hundreds of Schools of Thought

Emmm personally feels that the writing style is a bit strange, semi-classical Chinese with a twist of demonic history, a touch of light novel style, and some modern jokes. Then the system is fantasy and heaven, involving hundreds of schools of thought. This. . . . I wanted a certain depth of background and wanted the story to be relatively interesting, relaxed and even funny. The modern style of ancient style writing (but not ancient style writing) felt a bit fragmented. Also, the progress felt so fast. It started with cosmic astronomy. It was obviously a companion reader on the surface, but it kept getting misunderstood. Although it is not impossible, but as for the plot of the first dozen chapters, it was still difficult for me to understand. A lot of places are too rushed, and there is no detailed development, so I feel that the emotions are not in place. What is going on is what happened, and it is very confusing. It is difficult to follow the author's thoughts But if you give up thinking, it is not impossible to read, it just feels that it should not be like this, it should be better. There are 50 chapters so far, and I have only read more than 20 chapters. I am satisfied after reading it.

This is what the Luxians are like. Denying idealism and criticizing idealism are two different concepts, and what believers do is to deny idealism. However, idealism, as a stage in the development of human philosophy, liberates human beings from ignorant fetishism and moves towards rationalism, which is worthy of recognition. Any attempt to transcend idealism and deny that idealism ever served as a stage in philosophical epistemology is undoubtedly historical nihilism and is inconsistent with historical materialism. Since it is historical materialism, it means adhering to the basic position of historical facts, starting from the facts, making a leap from the stage of perceptual cognition of history to the stage of rational cognition, and finally returning to realistic practical activities. Even Hegelian philosophy played an important role in the historical process of opposing theism. Lenin once said that if you don't understand Hegelian dialectics, you won't understand Marx's Capital. Of course, today, when materialist dialectics is widely used in various academic fields, we may not necessarily need to understand Marx through Hegel, but we must be clear that the essence of dialectical materialism lies in the implementation of dialectics, that is, the unity of form and content, the unity of laws and cognitive systems. As for why Marxism is dialectical materialism, it is because it starts from facts and the history of things to comprehensively examine the movement and development of things. Undoubtedly, materialist dialectics, that is, historical materialism, are dialectically unified. Some people just read the quotations in textbooks and dare to regard them as truth. This is undoubtedly dogmatism. It should be noted that materialist dialectics is supposed to be an open science, not a scripture for people to understand like the previous idealism. It must adhere to facts as its standpoint, history as the context of movement development, and the proletarian standpoint, in order to draw objective conclusions that are consistent with human beings as a species. At the same time, we must also oppose some empiricism in the comment area. Can we no longer deconstruct terms that have appeared in history? If you regard the way of heaven in the book as a metaphor for capitalists, and the protagonist wants to grow step by step and subvert that world, then this is undoubtedly in line with historical materialism. Because it is impossible for people to build a kingdom of heaven from the ground out of thin air. Only by developing productivity step by step can corresponding production relations be established. When production relations no longer meet the development requirements of productive forces, productivity should be liberated by deconstructing production relations. Among them, material and spiritual are literal meanings. Materialism does not mean completely denying the active role of the spirit, otherwise it would be mechanical materialism. Whether matter determines spirit or spirit determines matter depends on whether it recognizes that the mental activities in the human brain are the subjective reflection of objective matter. People should constantly discover new things, recognize things, and transform things, instead of trying to form a logical framework with concepts in the human brain, and then stuff the movement and development of everything into that fixed logical framework. Any discipline that violates the objective and perceptual cognitive activities is undoubtedly a true idealist philosophical zombie. This book by Mushroom is a pity. The three laws of materialist dialectics, historical materialism, theory of contradiction and theory of practice, if used well, will be a good article in itself. It is a pity that some Luxians are too rough before drawing conclusions. They do not analyze specific issues in detail and look for patterns and connections based on facts. Instead, they try to use their own logical framework to understand the works of others. This is undoubtedly idealism.

Why do I feel like I saw it, it turned out to be a eunuch, abandoned

Alas, I just wrote a lot of things and finally deleted them, just two words for fattening. There are things I want to read in the author's book, and there are also things I don't want to read. It's quite confusing. I want to say a lot, but I know that I can't use reality to cover the author's fictional history, and use materialism to argue, so I will go with it. After taking some ideological and political courses, I won't show off my shame. In fact, at first I thought it was about developing science or directly using philosophy to smash these so-called schools of thought. Everyone has their own preferences for carrots and vegetables. In short, as I said, see what you want to see, I will fatten up first.

When the three important concepts of "materialism, horses and comrades" appear together in the introduction of a book, don't blame the reader for reading with a magnifying glass.

Materialistic? Forget it. As a brother said in this chapter, it is more appropriately called dualism. The only difference from Western Descartes' dualism is the transformation of the subjective idealistic "God" into the objective idealistic "Way of Heaven." Because this is an idealistic worldview with the Way of Heaven, there is no soil for true materialism to exist. Don't believe it? You see the plot. Regarding the theory about the movement of celestial bodies proposed by the protagonist, what is the decisive factor that really makes the Academy recognize it? Is it the model of the protagonist? It's the resonance of heaven! The way of heaven, in this worldview, is the representative of correct decisions! It's the so-called "evaluator"! Let's imagine this: If the protagonist didn't come up with the model that seemed to be able to justify himself, but was refuted and speechless, just when he was about to fail, suddenly, snap! Heaven resonates! Will everyone still believe it? Therefore, the so-called debate is a false proposition under the law of heaven. In this context, even if there is science, it is obtained through "observation" or "experiment" (the Mohist school in ancient my country is a typical representative. "Heaven's Will" and "Ming Gui" do not hinder the Mohist's scientific research). What can be verified is only the shallow "right or wrong", which prevents further digging into the soil of "why". This also hinders the possibility of abstracting concrete science into a materialistic worldview. In addition, I have to say that the author's understanding of "materialism" is too one-sided: materialism is science, but science is not materialism! Materialism is essentially a philosophical concept that regards matter rather than consciousness as the origin. In Ma's philosophy, it is a kind of science; but science is definitely not equal to materialism. Newton was a great scientist, but was he materialistic? No. He believes in God, but he believes that God has set laws for the operation of all things. Therefore, scientists are not necessarily materialistic, as long as they admit that all things operate in a regular manner, whether this law exists objectively, is given by God, or is included in the "Way of Heaven". So, to evaluate whether a person's worldview is materialistic or idealistic is not at all based on whether he believes in science. Although from life experience, a person who believes in science is most likely a materialist, from a philosophical point of view, or from a philosophical point of view, this is not the case. It can only be said that he is a person who believes that laws are objective and universal. Above.

Come on, big brother without mushrooms

The principles in this book are actually argued rather than proved, which really opened my eyes. If you argue well, the way of heaven recognizes it, and it becomes the truth accepted by everyone... The author has made it clear about the idealism of changing skin. … It took hundreds of years for the heliocentric theory to be proposed and confirmed. It was truly established after countless scholars obtained data from a large number of observations, made calculations, and made corrections. The protagonist proposed the heliocentric theory, without the support of observational data, and without seeing the process of calculation and demonstration. He just used some observed phenomena to prove it, and then made a small model, which was recognized by heaven, so everyone accepted it... Old man's subway mobile phone. Jpg This can be called 'materialism'. To be honest, I have some doubts about what materialism I understand is. It's not difficult to calculate, right? The data is not difficult to obtain, right? Even if the author writes that the protagonist shuts himself away for a year and just looks at the stars, the moon, and the sun all day long, and finally reaches the conclusion of heliocentrism after getting a lot of observed data and mathematical calculations, I can barely accept it. What the hell is this now?

Why is the comment area so chaotic? Alas, I guess this book will be sent again. I always thought that readers of Mushroom were sensible and would not blindly lick the author like readers of other books. Facts have proved that I was wrong😥You said, don't you think it's a good idea to write a campus love story for the money? Why do you want to touch materialistic Teacher Ma? 😥

Come, come, have a little fun I bet that the mushrooms will be cut before they can be put on the shelves. I bet 2,000 coins and I will put them in if they are put on the shelves. If you bet again, it will be listed on the shelves. The first order will not exceed 800, and the bet is 3,000 points. If you exceed it, you will bet. The word count will be 500,000 again, and the bet will be 2,000 points. Once the number is reached, the bet will be made. Bet one million words again, bet three thousand points, and bet when the number is reached! Let's have some fun together! You can come here whether you like it or not, and set your own bet, which will add some interest to the book.

I cried to death. Why does the author frequent eunuchs? Isn't it just to let everyone see more free chapters? Every time he eunuchs, everyone can see 100 free chapters of the new book. Isn't this saving money for everyone? Why doesn't anyone understand the author's good intentions? It is recommended that you start with a list of the proportion of free chapters and paid chapters. The author must be at the top!

Dog Mushroom, you won't read the book review section again, will you? Has your mentality been affected? What is the eunuch drawing? Didn't you write it very clearly in "The girl at the front desk is actually my number one black fan"? "Awesome, I Gradually Understand Everything" was 404ed, and "The Witch" was Eunuch, but it was not on the shelves. This book is not bad if it is on the shelves! Dog Mushroom, what are you drawing? If you run out of inspiration, you can take a leave first! You can ask your sister-in-law for information about your passion! Mouritian, why are you like this?

It doesn't matter if you're not a slutty eunuch. You can give everyone a new one.

When did b start the new book and when did it end? ?

I am really enlightened, and I argue one after another about materialism and idealism, saying that this is not materialism but objective idealism. Not to mention how many of these ideas come from Baidu, just say that you are autistic and let me read who wrote the novel. It is really either stupid or bad. Besides, is it necessary for the protagonist to directly change to be an objective idealist in order to reduce the controversy a little bit? Then is it necessary to explain to Qin Gong students the difference between subjective idealism and objective idealism, as well as the difference between idealism and materialism? You have to look at the problem from the perspective of development. It takes a lot of effort to read a novel. If it's good, it's over┐('～`；)┌

I think it would be interesting for the author to write a novel with himself as the protagonist, called "My Wrong Reader". Just kidding

It feels like although the setting is the Warring States Period, it is still written in the style of a youth campus light novel. The tearing feeling is a bit serious, and the character creation that used to be the advantages of mushrooms is difficult to stand up. The mushroom smell is enough, but the Shi (???) Flavor is not much, and it doesn't look that comfortable. Let's keep it and watch——

Gu Baoer can no longer be an eunuch. Having read several eunuch books in a row, it must be very uncomfortable if you can only eat soft food 😭

Does anyone know about a new mushroom book or vest?

Save money by reading books about mushrooms! He was worried that people couldn't afford it, and there were very few paid chapters, which made me cry to death 😭

What about the new book? I said you might as well write about the entertainment industry? Entertainment Star Factory is quite good-looking, and it's not easy to be warned. You tell me, the last vtb was originally very good, but it had to be clicked, and it didn't get any traffic.

Gou Mushroom is the only ten-year-old author in the Pujie group As soon as Gou Mushroom released his new book, Long Kongzhong laughed at him: "Gou Mushroom, you want a eunuch again!" He did not answer, but said to the editor: "Give me a thumbs up and add an introduction." With that, he posted two chapters of updates Long Kongzhong shouted again: "You must Whose idea did you copy again!" Gou Mushroom: "How can you accuse someone of innocence out of thin air?" "What innocence? I saw you copying an otome game and being beaten by a righteous reader with my own eyes a few years ago" "Creativity cannot be counted as plagiarism, but similarity! Can things on the Internet novel network be counted as plagiarism?"

After more than five months of rest, hasn't Dog Mushroom started writing yet?

Dog Mushroom, it's October, I've been waiting for you for more than a year! ! !

When will I write about Qian Tu, Super Electric Power, etc. I have read the later books except Learning Demons and President, but I have no interest in reading the other titles. They are too two-dimensional. The author apologizes every time he fails to finish, but when he looks at the next new book, he finds that the author actually doesn't summarize the reasons for his poor performance. The subject matter of your later works is so niche, so naturally the audience is not as large as before. Moreover, the title of the book is so two-dimensional that most new readers will not click on it to read it. So the results are naturally not high. If you choose a two-dimensional theme because of your interest, or if you can't spare the time to use routines, then don't care about the results. Instead, you should choose more popular themes and use a little bit of routines to attract readers and keep them.

It's such a pity that hundreds of schools of thought are chasing each other and that they are proud of each other. What's even more pity is that I've been waiting for a year and you haven't written anything 😐😐😐

Good, good

Brother, why haven't you opened the book yet? Abstraction is popular now~~ You have written it for so many years in advance 😵 People now want to read Fa Dian's story

Brothers, is this old pigeon next door

Why do I fantasize about you opening a book?