
Three Kingdoms: Emperor Xian Revives the Han
三国之献帝兴汉
- Status
- Ongoing
- Length
- 431k Words
- Genre
- Historical
- Subgenre
- Qin-Han & Three Kingdoms
- Updated
- 4y ago
- English
- Request a translation
Synopsis
Stats
183Chapters
1.9kRecommendations
5kFans
PausedPace
In booklists 2
Readers also read
Aren't You the South American Tyrant? Why Are You Fighting the Empire?
Emperor of Longevity: Emperor Xian of Han
Do We Not All Have the Same Blood?
Great Han: I Kicked Liu Bang Out of the Car from the Start
Reconstruction After the Plague
The Grand Strategists' Alliance
The Water Margin Nobleman
The Top Immortal of the College Entrance Exam
A Pair of Living People
The Age of the Yellow Sky
Oh No, I've Become Emperor Ling of Han
Liu Xie: I Really Just Want to Abdicate!
Reader comments 22
Google Translate










To be honest, Liu Bei at this time could not possibly have harbored any disloyal intentions. Whether in Romance of the Three Kingdoms or Records of the Three Kingdoms, Liu Bei's own survival was still unknown at this time, so to say that he harbored disloyal intentions is really far from the truth.
It's well-written and I enjoyed reading it. The only thing I find is that portraying Liu Bei in that way is a bit far-fetched. When Liu Bei declared himself emperor, his entourage was incredibly impressive; now, his three brothers have been separated and divided among themselves. I think he had that thought, but not to the point of extreme jealousy.
The author is quite peculiar. 99% Of those who read about Liu Xie's restoration of the Han Dynasty are fans of the Shu Han or the two Han dynasties. To write about a treacherous Liu Bei and a loyal Han minister like Cao Cao during a time when Lü Bu hadn't even been defeated is truly remarkable.
Alas, Liu Bei lacked even a solid foundation; what gave him the audacity to dream of becoming emperor?
Why must Liu Bei be a hypocrite? What did he do wrong this time? He overcame numerous obstacles, persevered, and ultimately achieved success. Isn't that worthy of admiration? Who among the heroes of the world could rival Cao Cao and Liu Bei?
Regarding Liu Bei, the author's handling of him is flawless. Even if the author portrayed him as a paragon of loyalty and righteousness, there would still be a large number of critics who dislike Liu Bei. Therefore, the author shouldn't worry about the comments, because opinions on the Three Kingdoms period, and on Cao Cao and Liu Bei, are inherently polarized and difficult to reconcile.
I don't understand. You guys are arguing in the comments section about a book I wrote so carefully. So many books, like "I only found out my dad was xxx after I rebelled," have so many readers. Books that are well-written are criticized, but those that are poorly written are accepted as nonsensical.
A Han Chinese transmigrated into a Mandarin dialect with a distinct "Hu" accent—wouldn't that kill him? Even if he learned Mandarin, his vocal cords, degenerated to only a few tones, wouldn't be able to produce proper Han Chinese sounds.
Those who admire Cao Cao relentlessly whitewash him, claiming he never plotted to usurp the throne and was a loyal subject of the Han Dynasty. However, Cao Cao's biggest stain is his massacre of entire cities, a fact that those who whitewash him always downplay or completely ignore.
This book is interesting. Keep it up and don't abandon it! I'll order as many copies as you update.