Three Kingdoms: Emperor Xian Revives the Han

To be honest, it is impossible for Liu Bei to have different aspirations at this period. Regardless of the Romance of the Three Kingdoms or the Chronicle of the Three Kingdoms, Liu Bei's own survival at this period is still unknown. To say that he has different aspirations is really out of touch with Dapu.

The writing is very good, and I am very happy to read it The only thing I think is that it is a bit outrageous to write Liu Bei like that. Let's talk about how luxurious the lineup was when Liu Bei became emperor, but now only the three brothers have been separated. I think he is a little bit like this, but not very jealous. People say Liu Bei is hypocritical, but his posthumous name is Zhaolie. Can't a person be called a gentleman if he has been hypocritical all his life?

The author is also amazing. 99% Of the people who came to see Liu Xie revitalize the Han Dynasty were fans of Ji Han and Han Dynasty. Even during the period when Lu Bu was not destroyed, he was able to write about Liu Xuande and Cao Mengde, a loyal minister of the Han Dynasty who had evil intentions. He is also a talent.

Alas, Liu Bei has no foundation at all, so why do he want to become emperor?

Why does Liu Bei have to be a hypocrite? What did he do wrong again? He went through ups and downs, persevered, and finally achieved something. Isn't this worthy of admiration? Who is the rival of the heroes of the world, Cao Liu.

Regarding Liu Bei, the author does not deal with any problems. Even if the author writes him as a person whose loyalty is more important than Mount Tai, there will still be a lot of people who don't like Liu Bei and will criticize the author. Therefore, the author does not need to pay attention to the comments, because everyone's evaluation of Cao Cao and Liu Bei during the Three Kingdoms period is inherently polarized and difficult to reconcile. There are a little too many criticisms in the chapter reviews. You, the author, should think this way: In fact, there are many people who think the author's writing is good, but those who want to criticize are more willing to post comments, while those who think the writing is good usually do not post chapter reviews specifically praising the handling of Liu Bei.

I don't understand that you are arguing in the comment section about a book written so seriously. There are so many books, such as "I rebelled, and then I found out my father is xxx", and so many people can read it. Everyone will find fault with well-written books, but those that are not well-written at all will be accepted as nonsense.

A time-traveling Han who speaks Hu (with a Mandarin accent) and speaks nonsense every time he opens his mouth will die? ? Even if he learns Chinese, his vocal cords that have degraded to only a few tones will not be able to pronounce Han Chinese sounds.

People who like Cao Cao blindly whitewash that Cao Cao did not seek to usurp the throne and was a loyal minister of the Han Dynasty. However, the biggest black spot of Cao Cao is not the massacre of the city. People who whitewash Cao Cao always downplay this or even mention it.

This book is quite interesting, keep it up. If I don't supervise you, I will order more for you.