The NBA's Best Teammate

Ten years ago, many high school classmates around me liked the Thunder. Their home teams might be the Lakers, Spurs, Celtics, and Heat, but when it came to the Thunder King and Super Sixth Man, they were basically just talking about it. At that time, the Warriors had not shown their edge. At that time, everyone thought that the future would be the era of three young players. At a young age, they defeated three championship-level teams, the Mavericks, Spurs, and Lakers, and reached the finals. The core of the three was a fifth-year, a fourth-year, and a third-year. The storm of youth. Unfortunately, fate was ill-fated. In the next few years, injuries took turns, and Harden was abandoned by the management. Even so, he was able to defeat the 67-win Spurs in 2016 and enter the Western Conference Finals, leading the 73-win Warriors three to one. It's a pity that all the stories end here. No matter how shocking the process is, losers in competitive sports are not praised. Without the ending of Return of the King, it would just be a failed story.

In fact, many of the tactics in the book are often used by various teams in the NBA. When I was doing the post-game review of the Thunder, I summarized about 5 sets of core tactics. The Thunder often played the same tactic several times in a row. There are also many changes to the same set of tactics. Just take a look and enjoy it😳 The new version will also update some basic tactics to improve the reading experience 😰

This kind of start is really good. The other kind of start with a weak protagonist who is discriminated against, ridiculed, and has a weak protagonist really makes me see the end.

The reason why I think this book is a pity is because I have no basketball articles to read. Others have either been read or are too vicious, or the style of writing is not suitable for me. As for this book, there are neither some mindless and poisonous plots, nor embarrassing and speechless emotional dramas, nor the choice of heroine. I didn't write NBA basketball articles in the Japanese comic style of second-tier passionate writing. Of course, I didn't forcefully lick some stars, such as Curry, the top four shooting guards. (Especially Kobe. Don't ask why it's special. The question is that if Kobe is not posted in basketball articles, there seems to be no traffic. Why is there no James? Because I have never seen basketball articles posted about him.) But we lost in the tiebreaker. Although it was because you controlled the rhythm, I still feel that it was also because of Kobe's last championship. Although I have no proof ( ｰ̀дｰ́ ). The most important thing is that if you lose 0-4 or 1-4 instead of losing in the tiebreaker, I won't feel that it is one of the reasons why Kobe is there. The topic is good because there is no plot mentioned above, and the one you wrote is about the protagonist becoming the Third Young Master of Thunder, because I continued reading and wrote about You, the Third Young Master of Thunder, which is the first one. But the bland description of the plot made me feel so pity. I seem to have seen somewhere that the author said it was because he wrote about the Thunder but not the Lakers or the Warriors and there was no traffic. I don't understand either. But I feel it shouldn't be the case. Do the three Thunder players have less traffic? Originally, the Thunder's three young men were one of the top perimeter combinations in history. Now that Harden has become the protagonist, he will definitely be one of the strongest combinations on the outside. There are still many people who are daydreaming about what would have happened if the Thunder's three young masters had not separated! In this book, the protagonist is replaced by Harden and becomes the third young master. It is written around many topics. But what the author wrote is that you can only fight against the wind, not against the wind. As long as the wind is against you, you will lose. Although it is reasonable, because others including the protagonist did not level up successfully in the early stage, it is too reasonable and unreasonable. A point guard with explosive violence that is rare in history, a singles player who has never been matched up in the whole court in history, plus the protagonist. In addition to the protagonist, all the cool things I can think of are the famous fast break scenes between the protagonist and Westbrook. They are no worse and more exciting than James Way, right? For example, the famous scene was designed to take turns to dunk on an unlucky guy. In some games, when the game was against the wind, the protagonist and Durant took turns to stand up and play singles. The famous scene where the opponent's star coach was stunned. Wait, the most important thing is that the details described must have a visual feel. Only then can we reveal the Three Young Masters of Thunder.

It is said that the Lakers were a super luxury F4 in the first and second seasons. I am a bit confused. Among the four, there are three old men who are 34+, and only one is considered young. Although he lost his terrifying defensive dominance after a serious injury, he is still in his prime after all, but is this a super F4? ? ?

The reason this book feels bland to me is that the whole text is almost not enjoyable. I wonder if the author has ever read Injuries in Basketball Will Only Make Me Stronger. The best thing about this book for me is that the plot he describes of the protagonist playing basketball will create pictures or even basketball highlights in my mind. Even if his plot design took three seasons to win the championship and four seasons to win the regular season MVP, there would still be a lot of excitement. First, the protagonist's basketball style performance, the protagonist's physical fitness performance, the basketball style author said that it is George's silky smoothness. The physical talent is very strong, but if I describe it in detail, I don't have many pictures in my mind. How he passes people, and how silky his dribbling is. His physical talent is very strong, so is his dunk the elegant stretch of Jordan Carter? Or Ross Westbrook's explosion. Or James' violence? Even though there are plots about the protagonist going out of his way to knock down others, the descriptions are very bland. Second, legendary. Although the author wrote that the protagonist's first-year statistics were comparable to those of rookie Jordan. But the description of the process is still bland. I think legendaryness refers to certain events, some topics that people still remember even after a long time, and that some people talk about are legendary. What are these components? For example, how to score key goals against opposing stars. For example, there are famous dunks in some famous scenes, some buzzer beaters, and some games that broke out and caused the team to move forward. Has the author thought about how to design these plots and descriptions in the past? The author of this book has designed key balls and dunks, but the description is either very bland or just brushed off? What impressed me most was that it was like playing the Lakers in the Western Conference Finals, in G4 or G5. The protagonist and Kobe played key shots against each other. The description was really fucked. I thought the protagonist was going to win this game, and he was going to carry the team like the boss of the team, but this is the result? In the remaining two or three rounds, Durant didn't have the physical strength to take the ball and missed the key ball. Then the team's defense failed and they lost. It felt like his pants were taken off, and then this? It seems that the author didn't design the plots in some of the remaining games where the protagonist burst out to carry the team or win a decisive victory, right? (Why do I say it seems like? Because it's impossible for a reader to have no impression of such a passionate and cool famous scene in a basketball article? But this book is so bland that it's really possible ๑˙ー˙๑)) I don't think cool articles mean that the protagonist must be invincible from the beginning. Rather, the plot settings for some exciting climaxes should be reasonable but not too reasonable. The most important thing is the specific description, details, and some atmosphere. Have a sense of picture. And basketball articles must be fun. The scene that depicts the protagonist's elegance, explosiveness, etc. As a swingman on the court, or the violence of the center and power forward is a very important part of basketball literature! This book is about mediocre winning games, mediocre losing games, and forgetting about losing games. You also devoted considerable space to writing. Even if you use a lot of space to write it, your description is so impressive (눈_눈)! The protagonist really gave me the impression that he was not competitive. No one has the temperament to become the boss of the team, even if you design his rookie season to be comparable to Jordan's rookie season. What makes people called "Tim Duncan on the back line. The peak of his debut". The protagonist you described did not make me feel passionate once during the game (hot blood here refers to the style of writing that makes people feel passionate, not the embarrassing and speechless secondary passionate.)

East 77 is so outrageous. I was a little dumbfounded when I watched the highlights. Is this a tiebreaker? Paul is really old. He is being targeted defensively and defensively. Height is a disadvantage at this time, and it will be difficult to compete for the championship in the future... Thank you again for your favorites and recommendation votes~

Finished with flowers. Don't write your new book so early in the timeline. First of all, I'm not familiar with it, it's too old, and secondly, it's not interesting to confront James and Durant. It would be better if it is between 03 and 10. It has been 20 years since 2003, and 20 careers is enough.

In fact, it's not that I don't like to team up with Kobe James, I just don't want to see the protagonist travel through the past and become Kobe James' younger brother. If you want to write a novel about Kobe James, can you make the protagonist and Kobe James a rival? Falling in love and killing each other, isn't this better than writing about being a younger brother? There are still a bunch of people saying that the protagonist went back to play with the Lakers and became friends with Kobe. The two of them are equals. I beg those who are saying this, please stop saying that. It's really disgusting.

Restricting reinforcements is a bit deliberate. Let's not talk about the Thunder period. I had no connections, was targeted, and refused to spend money. There was really nothing I could do. The Clippers are different. Why not use it if you have the money? The rookie has been robbed, right? Then I will quote the opponent's player option player. Even if the opponent chooses to match, I will disgust the opponent to see how many people dare to deliberately target him.