I’ll Pick Four Viewers from Chat and Take Them to Conquer the LPL

To be honest, what I wrote above is quite good, especially the idea of ​​barrage pumping friends playing LPL is very good. The conflict between the system that wants to lose the game and the professional dreams of teammates is also natural. This conflict has not been shown in a large space, but it must be a plus point if it is handled well. As for the beginning of this water pumping friend, there is currently no similar work in lol, and the conflict is handled well, and there is still some innovation. But I don't know why, but something doesn't feel right about the chapter where a teammate suddenly and unexpectedly turns into a hidden super hacker. First of all, I don't know how much the author knows about network security. I am from the 985 network security major, so it seems very awkward. I can only say that the author's speculations on this field account for more than 99% of the chapter. In today's online article market, when you, the author, write about certain professional content, if you don't have the energy to verify the information to at least confuse laymen, then you will either blur it out and skip it, or you will copy some past cases and treat it as something that has never happened in the parallel world. Your own random conjecture is really blunt and full of loopholes. In that chapter, every sentence related to the professional field will make 10,000 comments. However, I will not talk about these professional fields that have nothing to do with writing. The above itself is not the focus of what I want to say. After all, not every reader understands network security. The following is the core content I want to say, which involves two aspects. One is the confusion in writing style, and the other is the obsolescence of routines. Because these two are actually the same thing in the final analysis, that is, the author's level dropped sharply after a certain chapter, switching from the highly innovative style of web writing in the past two years to the old-era web writing style with a lot of old templates, so they will be described together below. Let's talk about the writing style first. After his teammate suddenly became a hacker, the hacker teammate was still self-taught (I am not saying here whether the setting of self-taught is possible in professional terms, although I personally think it is absolutely impossible. What I am talking about here is a plot like this: "When the protagonist or other important character encounters difficulties, he suddenly finds himself a little kid who is usually inconspicuous, shy and has low self-esteem. "Brothers are secretive bosses and then easily solve huge problems with some unexplainable method." Is the arrangement of such a plot too behind the times in terms of writing? I believe the brothers who have seen it have an answer themselves) , and this secretive hacker boss + LOL teammate is also a patient with ALS, and then the author stirred up a wave of excitement, describing an ALS patient's ambition to break into LPL. For those of you who read this book review, did you feel that it was a bit vulgar? Let's not talk about the professional medical issues related to ALS and the professional issues related to network security. Just look at the arrangement of the plot setting, whether the buffs are stacked up or not. This is also a common routine in Internet literature in the old era, that is, an inconspicuous character has a heavy story + a very high status in a certain field + a certain person. Some forced ideals (please forgive me for using the word forced, maybe the author does not understand the level of the hacker described by the author, I can only say that this kind of person can earn over 100 million RMB by relying on an unpublished vulnerability in his hand, and the stolen money is still clean and cannot be traced or traced). Then after a game, the protagonist went to contact the official to give the MVP to this teammate (this operation can only be said to be unreasonable, but it is not too unreasonable. After all, the author's previous content about hackers has almost entered the realm of metaphysics. I would not be surprised if the author said that a supporting character is a practicing Taoist priest who can measure good and bad luck, but with Compared with the content before the author put it on the shelves, it is very wrong. No matter how unreasonable things are, an author should be able to use reasonable writing techniques to write them. The author just made a not so unreasonable thing very unreasonable - from the perspective of writing techniques). At this point, my level of suspicion is not suddenly reduced but confirmed. Actually, if this book were written at the same level as before, and then included a story about a team of water friends winning the championship, the conflicts and the baggage of the setting would be enough to write, and it would probably achieve good results. It can only be said that the current situation is either because the author messed up, or it was sold to a studio for bulk renewal. The above is a review of Shennong's book, for your reference only. If it is 5 points, it can be scored 3.5-4 Points in the same field before the hacker chapter I mentioned.

In the introduction, isn't it easy to lose? Isn't it easy to fail in building a team? First let's talk about the conditions for joining the team: ①: To join the team, you need to pay a monthly team fee of 5 million. The team fee belongs to the captain and can be used at will. ②: Only female team members are recruited, and team members must cooperate with the team leader's requirements (anything they understand), and they do not need to take any responsibility for the requirements. The above two days alone are enough for team building to fail. Is 10 billion U. S. Dollars not a good deal? Or is a 100-year lifespan too short? Or maybe Superman's physique is too rubbish?

It's really too casual to buy a training base. I really don't know the details of large companies, but I have been trading stocks for seven years, and I dare to say that I have outperformed inflation. I have a good understanding of the financial details of listed companies. After all, I really do it all the time. Dare to give away a profit of one or two billion yuan just because the chairman's daughter is around? What is a chairman? It is the leader of the board of directors. Generally speaking, he is the person with strong ability or the most shares. He is the head of a company, but it does not mean that other people on the board of directors are unimportant. Every profit belongs to all shareholders. In other words, if the chairman's shares are not too high, twenty or thirty shares, and there is competition from other major shareholders, the chairman may be removed by the board of directors if he is involved in the transfer of interests. If it is a listed company, he may be sent in if he encounters a shady opponent. If the heroine and the protagonist are engaged, I can still accept it, and the shareholders can also accept it. Just because the heroine is beside me, I will give one or two hundred million, but if the chairman is standing next to me, I will give him one billion? Isn't this messing around? So, this chapter is written like this to highlight the background of the heroine, which is quite...

What is the concept of 107 consecutive wins? How could you still be looked down upon?

Brother, with Thresh's q's personal skill, before q has even flown, the barrage has time to type a dozen words and send it out? And when Thresh moves forward, can he still use reaction q to people who suddenly appear without vision? Not a prediction? Who can tell the reaction?

I found that many people who write e-sports novels have a problem. A prince can write a few hundred words of essays during his eQ flash. What about your bullet time? ? ? ?

I can write more than ten chapters in one ranked game, which is amazing.

All the water friends are Zaun pianists. Thresh can type out dozens of words of barrage before finishing playing Q, right?

Novel recommended by Qidian. Com, you won't want to read it just by reading the introduction

Hello author, I came to see you with the recommendation ticket that you liked very much during your lifetime, 5555555555