Potions Professor at Hogwarts

How can I say this? It's a pretty good book. Although there are some small logical loopholes, such as how he knew the plot when he was a vegetable in his previous life, why he didn't help Sirius Chen Qing when he knew the secret keeper was changed, and why he didn't just collect Horcruxes when he knew the plot, but these can't cover up the excitement of this book. A very interesting book. Worth a look😁

A few nitpicks I just read a little bit and thought of continuing Disclaimer that I don't have any emotions about the author, just talk about things The part where the protagonist picks up Harry feels like the progress is too fast. Harry is a child. The protagonist comes in and uses magic to stun the Dursleys and then congratulates Harry to himself. It happened, and then quickly teleported. Harry's mood was so abnormal I was so noisy about this bullying. No one with normal views, including me, would find the protagonist who is a bully very enjoyable, pleasing to the eye, or engaging. I suggest you modify it In addition, I want to criticize those who say that Snape is not a good person. Bullying doesn't matter, people shouldn't trample on others, bullying itself is unacceptable no matter what the reason is. Although I don't think the wizarding world itself has any perfect laws, this behavior is unacceptable whether it is based on moral sense or natural law In addition, the plot about Draco in Diagon Alley, It's too low. Homomorphic revenge is normal, and it's even worth encouraging in a place with imperfect laws like the wizarding world. But expressing anger is too low, especially when it involves underage children. This kind of behavior is very, very, very, very low. Such a protagonist is difficult to make people feel involved. It is also recommended to modify it

Nurmengard is not on an island, but in the Austrian mountains, and there are no guards in Nurmengard. Grindelwald is following the agreement with Dumbledore

😒 The protagonist's neurotic and retarded reactions can be said to be a character setting, but with some of the author's imaginings of common sense, it becomes unbearable. For example, the ordinary dentist in Hermione's family is poor...

Although I already disliked this character, I still read more than 20 chapters and saw Banban being arrested. I felt that this book was complete from the setting point of view. You have to be a parent, but nothing remains the same, and then you use too much force later on, giving people the impression that you just went away for what you did earlier! ,,, The reasons are also very weird. They quarreled at the critical moment, and then Lili and Harry's family went crazy.,,, There was a feeling of this. Pig's feet's character can be said to be a model of incompetence and rage. When it's time to work, you are submissive. Later, when you know the plot well, you punch back. If Bai Lianhua herself is not a plot licker, she vomits blood and works part-time to talk about historical inevitability,,,, in short, it just keeps piling up to show that pig's feet are awesome, but pig's feet are really useless and have done nothing except school violence and stripping people's pants. I have been waiting for the main plot for twenty years.

The writing style is genuine and mediocre, there are a lot of typos and it means there is no review after typing, and the logic in it is too crappy, there are too many poisonous points, it contains private information and ignores the basic logic. I suggest that fake fans can read it to kill time. Old fans should forget it and vomit blood after reading it.

Why does the protagonist feel like a child?

I think the biggest shortcoming of the protagonist is that she loves the original work too much, making her feel like an outsider. If you want to solve this problem, you should dilute the protagonist's memory of the original work at the beginning instead of loving it too much. Otherwise, the protagonist will not seem to have gone to another world at all, but rather like an invincible person, which is the reader's imagination, but it is still acceptable.

The protagonist squeezed out Pettigrew and became the Secret Keeper? Then the protagonist is the traitor.

You are the first one to clean up Fenrir in so many years 😅

The unlucky one is always the Sri Lankan teacher. Oh, why do you like those three? But it's okay. It's a pretty good book.

It stretches my crotch too much. The plot hasn't changed much after 10 years of time travel.

School bullying? Co-author Shen Feng Wuying is a fruit cutter. The world is not black and white, and Snape was not a good person when he was at school. The movie version is too Christian.

It's been a long time since I've seen a novel with such a wrong outlook. The character descriptions are not very profound, the plot has not changed, and the protagonist's personality is contradictory. It doesn't have any special features, except that the setting is a bit novel, but I think many people can't accept it.

òᆺó First, although I chose the Eagle Court instead of the Badger, the protagonist still hates Hufflepuff's prejudice. The Badger Court is the largest group of wizards in the British wizarding world, but has not produced a single dark wizard (original text in the book ), sincere and kind, not leftovers from other houses Secondly, in Azkaban, the economic prisoners are all Ravenclaws, those who get into fights are Gryffindors, Slytherins are locked in the innermost, but there is no Hufflepuff

Want the daily life of GGAD!!!

How could Dumbledore be so stupid and slow to respond as you wrote?

Um, what's the difference between Potions and Potions? It seems not

1. When writing this novel, I read the original work and consulted the "Harry Potter Encyclopedia" and "Harry Potter Wikipedia" while writing it. Of course, there are some omissions in it. I am also grateful to all the book friends for reminding me to correct the errors one by one. However, I found that some book friends may have read too many secondary creations and confused the content of the secondary creation with Rowling's basic settings. For example, a book friend reminded me that "Phoenix Fox only eats herbs", but in fact I checked the three places mentioned above and could not find the source of this statement. I guessed that this book friend may have confused the setting of a certain secondary creation. For another example, a book friend reminded me that "Nurmengard is located in the mountains, not on the island." I searched the encyclopedia and original books, but could not find the source of this statement. Of course, I also did not find the location of Nurmengard clearly given. But it can be seen from a simple clip in "Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows" that Grindelwald was imprisoned on an island, not in a mountain. There are many such reminders. Of course, there are also reminders that are indeed my negligence. For example, a book friend reminded me that "an owl is an owl." No matter which one it is, I am very grateful to all the book friends for reminding me. This will help me make fewer mistakes. What I want to say is that I will try my best to make the settings consistent with the original work, and there will be no settings that are inconsistent with the original work. 2. Regarding the comparison of wizards' combat power and other issues, The comparison of combat power in the Harry Potter world is very similar to the settings of martial arts novels. A great knight who comes and goes may be overturned by a third-rate warrior. To give two examples: Voldemort defeated Dumbledore, but he was defeated by Harry Potter. This does not mean that Harry Potter is better than Dumbledore in direct combat power comparison. The second one is that Molly defeated Bella, and Bella was the core figure of the Death Eaters and had captured and tortured the Aurors Longbottom and his wife, but this does not mean that Molly is more powerful than the Longbottom and his wife. It doesn't mean that Molly is more powerful than Aurors. The comparison of combat power in the wizarding world often doesn't make much sense. It is affected by many factors such as environment, characters, personality, wand quality, off-site factors, etc. The simplest example is actually Lockhart. Lockhart dominates the world with his one-handed forgetfulness and has deceived so many powerful wizards. Can you say that he is not powerful? But if he is so powerful, why can't he even take a Defense Against the Dark Arts class? So, the comparison of combat power in the wizarding world does not make much sense. 3. Influence and change history. This is a difficult topic to get around. After all, Alexis appeared before Voldemort's war. He will inevitably have an impact on history. Some book friends think that he failed to keep James and Lily alive, so the protagonist is a waste. I explained in the original article that James and Lily could have survived, but everyone was negligent at the last moment. Everyone thought the overall situation was decided, so a quarrel occurred between James and Alexis, and James drove Alexis away, which led to tragedy. 4. Some book friends think that Alexis knelt down and licked Harry or something. I want to say, what is kneeling and licking? When an elder treats a junior well, is that also called kneeling and licking? For Alexis, Harry is his junior, the child of his best friend, and his nephew. However, just a few months after this little nephew was born, his parents died due to his negligence. They have not seen each other for eleven years. Now that they have just met, shouldn't he be nice to his little nephew? How did this become kneeling and licking? There seem to be only a few controversial points for the time being. I hope I have explained them clearly. Book friends are also welcome to continue to raise doubts or questions. Only mutual discussion can make the facts clear.