Kingdom of Nations

The writer Jiuyu deserves a grand introduction! Few people can achieve this level of fantasy treatment of a Western historical background. The solid text truly introduces people to the medieval era, the era of the Crusades, the Templar Knights and the establishment of the Kingdom of Jerusalem, and the iron and blood battles between Christians and Muslims. The protagonist was born as a slave and became the closest confidant of the "Leper King" Baldwin. I look forward to seeing the Kingdom of Heaven in this book, the rise and fall of the Crusaders, and how the story will develop after the arrival of the protagonist and the magical rewriting.

The writing is okay, but the writing style is a bit uncomfortable to watch. After reading part of it, the plot is basically more daily, with a lot of descriptions of the protagonist, but it is actually quite transparent. If it is more daily and plain, this kind of writing style is a bit uncomfortable to watch. The author is still very powerful. It may be better to use another way of writing.

When I first watched it, I thought it was a beautiful fairy tale, a beautiful development of all stereotypes. However, it is filled with a lot of details and flexible character reactions, and it has a sense of escapism. It is really a beautiful refuge from the troubles and complicated real life. We will always support genuine products!

I don't quite understand the direction of the plot. Does Cesar want to build a universal empire without ethnic groups, religions, gender barriers and discrimination? During the Crusades? When I read the introduction to this book, I thought it was a story about establishing a large empire covering the Crescent and Egypt in the Eastern Mediterranean, and the protagonist becoming a great feudal lord. Looking at the progress of the plot, I suddenly remembered a novel "Conquest of Heaven" written a long time ago with almost the same era. The male protagonist Lenger in it was nicknamed "The Holy Son". After becoming the Roman emperor for three years, he lost his temper because of his excessive steps, which led to betrayal and separation. In the end, he went to China with the caravan to become a son-in-law. The perception of that novel, especially the second half and the ending, can be said to be very bad. The setting of this novel is indeed interesting, but I personally feel that the writing skills are limited. When writing about the protagonist facing challenges, it cannot give readers a tense and heart-wrenching feeling. On the contrary, some people complain about the male protagonist's operation. I see that many readers have not rated the twenty or so chapters of the recent "Broken Wings" very well. I read two chapters of the Great Excommunication, and I feel that this is not a big deal, but a big deal. But there aren't many written about the Crusades, so just treat it as hay (it counts as hay in this kind of book) and keep gnawing on it.

The author has a good writing style, and many details of life are described in a very graphic and warm way. Furthermore, the relationship between the two of them was well described by Bowser. In fact, it is rare to see a relatively pure and extensively described brotherhood in male videos, so I once thought it would be biased towards the same brotherhood. Some characters just died. Yes, that was it. It was quite shocking, but it was also a breaking point. I quite liked the descriptions in those chapters. The only bad thing is that sometimes the author will write a sentence back and forth several times, and sometimes he will write off the mark, and then go around in a big circle and come back again. I can't say that it is not very good, I can only say that the desire to share is really high.

There are ants crawling in my heart, show me another picture and I will do anything😭😭😭😭

😂😂

The book is very good, and the author listened to his advice. In this case, I would like to make one more small comment. The protagonist was an unbeliever in his previous life, but at least the world he traveled to has a large-scale, divine and supernatural power that is visible to the naked eye. In this case, it is unnecessary and illogical to emphasize that the protagonist is still an unbeliever at heart. From the author's point of view, it is recommended to avoid this part as it will not offend any readers (regardless of whether they have faith or not).

I don't understand why the author likes to forcefully promote female rulers in the Middle Ages, and also likes to forcefully increase the burden on the protagonist. To put it bluntly, he likes to torture the protagonist. Every time the plot seems to be gaining momentum, he will just pull a big one. If the wife was stabbed and was careless, she should have remembered it after dying once. She fell into the shithole twice. The plot was all plotted and forced to break up. The establishment of Rome was based on religion and conspiracy. The more it goes on, the more contradictory it becomes. The key is what are you trying to shape through these? I don't understand. The previous chapter has been foreshadowing how the male protagonist's three views are stable, which means that he deserves to suffer all the time. I really don't understand this author. This protagonist is not from modern times at all, and there is no such talent in modern times. I gave up. I really can't stand it anymore.

If you really think the protagonist is a living saint, let him go to the cross. A gentleman can be bullied. Writing a pure protagonist in a world with low combat power is okay. If you want to write a pure protagonist with a slightly higher combat power, it will easily become a turtle novel. The protagonist is so useless that I really want people to abandon the book. The reality is already very depressing. Why should I feel depressed while reading a novel? There is no need to act recklessly, at least you have to be happy with your grudges, and it's not like any second-rate guy can step on Cesar. Although the plot is advanced by the old bastard Lao Bo, although neither party has a bad relationship, the protagonist is too holy.

"I couldn't sleep anyway, so I read carefully for half the night, and then I saw the words "Nine Fishes" in the author's name. There were four words written all over the book, which meant "nine chapters a day"!"

This is the third time I have written a review of this book. The first two times were all deleted. I have already seen the latest one. Ever since Baldwin died, I have felt that the plot is like one bite of cake and one bite of shit. I don't know the author's background data. Did the data increase or decrease after Baldwin's death? If it increases, it means that readers like me are not the target group of your book, and I don't need to read it anymore. If it drops, please consider the feelings of us old readers. I came from Gray Detective, and I can only say that there are not many young people there who are ill. Before Baldwin's death, the two of them wrote about it as if they were gay, and then Baldwin, who was very colorful, died like a clown. You might as well arrange for him to die on the battlefield. You could write less about the protagonist's daughter and describe it from a more grand perspective. Nowadays, there are constant controversies in writing. The latest story is about being kidnapped by a conspiracy. I really don't want to talk about it anymore. It's an eternal conspiracy, always being passive, and always taking a bite out of it. You have to cheat, search and search again, write nitroglycerin, and only use it once. It's said to be a gift, but it's useless when it's deficient. This can be regarded as my complaint. If this post is deleted, there is really no need for me to read this book again. People like me are not your audience. I am not a masochist. I will ask for another whipping after being beaten.

No wonder the results are not good. In this impetuous society, even the titles of books are getting whiter and whiter, but dozens of chapters are spent on the protagonist's betrayal and separation. I don't know how the author convinced the editor

I'm exhausted after reading half of it, so read with caution if you haven't read it yet 🙂 This book is like a strange-flavored candy. There is a sweet taste on the surface when you first enter the mouth, but as it melts in the mouth, the strange taste slowly comes out. The seasoned villain reuses it crazily to make it unique. It is an "advanced" conspiracy feast created by the fusion of the "Madonna" protagonists. The author's writing style is definitely experienced and powerful, but as described before, it definitely tastes sweet but tastes strange when you try it carefully. I don't know if it is because of the female author as mentioned in the comment area, but I can only conclude that men should be cautious (if it is more suitable for female channels, I don't know).

I really like this novel. The author has handled the characters of Baldwin and Xiaosai very well. He insists on making up these routines and this kind of tragedy that can be seen at a glance. Who can't see this? Does the author respect the readers' wishes equally? Everyone is subscribing to read novels and paying for them. Why should we indulge in our literary youth disease? I can accept Xiao Bao's death but I can't die. It's pointless to be so sloppy and low-level. In addition to all the previous spoilers, everyone knows who the murderer is behind the scenes. I know that people who write online novels have more or less the intention of getting rid of the definition of popular novels, but they can't be so rough and fall into the vulgarity. In short, Jiuyu, what you write is not classic literature after all. Why can't you respect the readers' wishes? I really don't have the literary youth disease, can you take it back?

The writing style is so good, but it is written by a woman. I feel very sad. The Reign of the Dead, Louis XIV, is written in such a majestic style, but it is definitely written by a woman! I'm very conflicted

If you can't hold it any longer, just assassinate whoever you want. If anyone wants to die, just arrange for an unknown person to come out and assassinate him. As a person who doesn't know the Middle Ages at all and doesn't know Sibyl at all, I know that this person needs to be watched carefully. Then the two protagonists were assassinated as if their brains were not working. The queen mother was also an abstract person. Just like the conspiracy of the Byzantine court before, she became an invisible person through experience, right? It's messed up to advance the plot in order to advance the plot.

If you can read it in one breath, it is undoubtedly well written. As a reader's God's perspective, we actually know that the protagonist will not be completely defeated before the end of the story no matter what. All the hardships and malice towards the protagonist are just expressions of desire and suppression after the reader is withdrawn from the story. When entering the story, it is through this continuous roller coaster experience to stimulate the reader's feelings. The author is like a whip with a whip, constantly beating, and then giving a sweet date at the right time. However, this is an online novel after all. It is quite torture to keep going through this cycle of experience. As a reader, the story always stops in the summer, which amplifies the depression before the climax of the plot and exposes the protagonist's problem of passively following the crowd. At least when I read this novel, I still don't understand what the protagonist's inner driving force is. I can only vaguely feel that the protagonist, as a time traveler, wants to change the ignorant society built by the church. Although the author reveals to us the achievements of the future protagonist through a third person's narration in the novel, he never sees the protagonist's own initiative in promoting the plot from the protagonist's perspective. He is just repeating the plot cycle of others setting up a conspiracy for the protagonist, the protagonist finding his way out of the plot, and then through various arrangements and even coincidences, the protagonist resolves the crisis. This always gives me a very uneasy feeling.

France and Italy, now it is the turn of the Crusader countries, when will there be Rome?

Normally speaking, in everyone's perception, it is normal for the court to have more intrigues. But on the battlefield, you don't need so many internal intrigues. In a situation where you are precarious and your hormones are raging, whoever plays with your brains so much will be killed if you feel something is wrong...

This assassination was too mechanistic. It would have been more reasonable to have a meteorite fall from the sky and kill the Leper King. The church recruited a bunch of people to assassinate them without leaking any news, and no one reported on them. They also suddenly received a cup of poison that could suppress even gifts, and it would kill them in a few minutes. What kind of neurotoxin is this? 😥

The male author's classics are overwhelming, and that's no problem, but what you wrote is a hammer-like one. Before you meet the protagonist, you will obey the protagonist. After meeting the protagonist, except for the villain who is a target, everyone is willing to do things for the protagonist. What is the difference between this and the ancient Internet literature? Female authors like to use tactics to solve opponents, but are you completely at odds with male authors? The villain of the male author is always passively beaten by the protagonist, and you are the protagonist and always passively beaten by the villain. The main character is the one who attacks first, so I am fighting back in self-defense, right? The villain of the male author is amazingly powerful, and then he doesn't do anything. When he meets the more powerful protagonist, he is beaten into a son by the protagonist's super-era technology, and his main focus is a "weapon for the decisive battle of the empire." As for the female author, it doesn't matter whether the villain is strong or not, but he must be cunning and cunning. He likes to trick the protagonist and rely on political struggle to solve everything. This is not impossible, but why do you write the political struggle like a second-rate palace fight? Focusing on a "strong villain's weak point". Of course, I am talking about a very low-level author. The author of this book is at least very good at plot reversal. After all, most readers can occasionally guess the plot, but they don't expect that the author can really write it like this. Most of them think that the author will not write it like this, but they don't expect the author really dares to write it like this.

There are enough SBs in the starting point, this kind of plot should not appear in my bookshelf 😰

At first, I thought that the Kingdom of Nations would refer to the Kingdom of Heaven in Jerusalem... But after getting on the line with Dandolo, I had to consider that the Kingdom of Nations would not refer to the Latin Empire that took over the castle. The Latin Empire was really a bad negative asset, born out of injustice and dying in shame... Well, it is actually a story about the Franks being unable to establish effective local rule through feudalism and ruining the administrative legacy of the Eastern Empire. And some irresponsible guesses [Look at the latest chapters] Whether there will be the following plots in the future: 1. Venetian citizens riot [after all, Dandolo is pulling the big family to dig out the foundation of the republic] 2. The Fourth Crusade dies or something unexpected happens [Looking at the situation in Venice, it is difficult to say whether even if it borrows debt, it can gather the strength to launch the Crusade...] 3. The most undesirable thing is Xiao Ser's Latin Empire - to be honest, to secure this position, God would appear and go to the Roman castle to split two fires of brimstone. He would also have to send his Son to the castle to persuade the Greeks to obey... Finally (eyes closed) as a personal suggestion from an old reader... Well, Jiu Yu Da should continue to focus on people and blur the macro-political economy. The story is equally exciting, but the lack of reference books really makes me feel a little stomachache.

He began treating Baldwin since he was a child, and the cure was gone. This is too contradictory. Such a large-scale description, I thought there would be an explanation later, but in the end I pulled a big one.

It feels like the author has very strict restrictions on the protagonist, and not many people are nice to the protagonist.

So, after Manuel finally died in a funny and interesting way in this book, maybe he can finally judge the final character of Yi Er - then, the summary is written above: even if they are not completely opposite, they can be said to be very different. The image deliberately designed for the sake of plot arrangement is really disgusting and clownish, as if there is no virtue as a king to be presented... I don't know what is worth writing about in defeating such a "strong enemy" who is far away from history but bears the same name (sigh). As the fourth hero of the Comnenus dynasty, Alexios, the successor after John II, although his achievements cannot be said to be as perfect as the court literati said. But if we look at the before and after and summarize, this is still the renaissance era of the Eastern Empire. In terms of diplomacy, the efforts to deal with Normans and return to Italy may indicate that the emperor still has illusions about the ancient imperial rule - but as Jingluo, it seems that we cannot blame him in this regard. And although this wasted the empire's finances, there were no major problems until the time of his death. The influence and control over the Kingdom of Heaven and Antioch can be said to be unprecedented. This is based on the actual need to use Latins as a barrier to resist Muslims. In terms of domestic affairs, Manuel finally relatively completely rebuilt the empire's finances, bureaucracy, and local control [yes, that means Venice—the empire expelled the Republic and regained control of the Aegean trade to enrich its finances], in order to complete the plan of the Komnenos family, and once again be able to use the power of the entire empire to invest in one goal, and make the empire have the capital to accept one failure after another in order to wait for success. In terms of military affairs, perhaps the greatest achievement was the surrender of Hungary, which stabilized the western frontier of the empire during his rule. As for the conquest of the East, it can only be said that for the Eastern Empire, the victory or defeat of just one battle can no longer decisively affect the situation in Asia Minor. Strength, rejuvenation and luxury are probably synonymous with the Manuel era, which brought him the name "The Great". So back in the book (showing hands) the end of a great emperor is really... Deliberate. Senseless cruelty to the people around them, some inexplicable incestuous deeds and illegitimate children taking power in various ways, the mature imperial family, the Komnenos family or the Komnenos Party have not yet fallen to the point of relying on such things to maintain their rule - in fact, it is impossible. [To be honest, I suspect that the author is assigning the bastard Andronikos Komnenos, a serious incest and tyrant, to Manuel... But I can't find the reason] So, if there is any gap in Manuel, his ability to recognize people is indeed not as good as that of Alexios and John. The regent team left behind did not handle the political turmoil well, and a bad person finally came to power, which ruined the empire. After saying so much, it can also be a complaint: the arrogant and powerful hero became a maggot, and this death was funny but appropriate for him. The funny thing lies in the mismatch between the facts and the image in the book; And the appropriate thing is that he can finally rest in peace, end the plot requirements and return to his true self.

I have posted several posts here before to point out my thoughts peacefully, but they disappeared soon after. I don't understand. I didn't curse or say anything, I just expressed my thoughts. Maybe it touched the author's sore spot😥

Those who understand it say it is a masterpiece, while those who cannot understand it feel like they are facing Cthulhu. . . First of all, it is the foundation to read and understand the Kingdom of Heaven. You need to have a deeper understanding of medieval divine power, royal power, social status, etc. Without these foundations, watching this game will be like facing Cthulhu directly. The author deeply sympathizes with the experience of Baldwin IV in the movie, and also has a feeling: in such a complex environment, is it possible to build an inclusive, peaceful, wealthy, and abundant dynasty? Or is it like the hidden thread buried in the movie, the confrontation between Rome (theocracy) and Jerusalem (royalty), the dispute between Christians and Saracens, the conflict between fanaticism and tolerance, which will inevitably lead to the fateful destruction of the Kingdom of Heaven? Balian, the protagonist in Kingdom of Heaven, is like an outsider breaking into the center of the political whirlpool. It makes people imagine, if I replace this chess piece and throw in a saint-like character, can the outcome be changed? So the core of this work is to idealize a person who grew up under the red flag with the thinking model of New China, endow it with powerful divine power, and then put it into the virtual environment to complete the author's dream of establishing a "heaven on earth". It is an enjoyable article by the author YY, so some conflicts and frustrations are idealized and weakened. Only retain the overall smoothness without forcing intelligence.

How many years did Jiuyu first write a book? From Qidian, I can only see the one written by Saint in 2015. I feel that he is the number one author among the female authors of Qidian who writes male videos.