A True Record of Rebellion in the Age of Empires

We support anything that opposes the Qing dynasty!

There once was a sleazy guy named "My Great Qing," with a face full of pockmarks. For some reason, whenever I saw someone beating him up, I felt incredibly happy! 😄😄😄

The "Golden Finger" story has over forty chapters, but only the first five or six chapters mention it. The writing style is quite good, but it deviates too much from the theme. Many people criticize the author for being self-willed... I've read his previous books, and he always forgot about the "Golden Finger" and only wrote about trivial matters.

The moment the militia appeared, it felt like they were being overpowered. With such limited resources, they could recruit people from the modern world and even indoctrinate them with ideological convictions. In the modern world, they could probably become a planetary leader.

Do you know who invented the earliest eye exam and glasses fitting? It was Sun Yunqiu, a scholar from the late Ming Dynasty. So, don't always assume that everything was invented by foreigners. Before the Qing Dynasty, China's scientific level was no less than that of Europe. Don't look down on yourself.

The author bestowing the title of Empress Dowager upon his mother-in-law is surprising enough, but what's even more outrageous is that his own parents weren't given any titles.

I have a question... The British were already using Minié rifles in the 17th century?! Emperor Kangxi was born in 1654 and ascended the throne in 1661! That's the 20th year of his reign! I was born in 1681! The British were already using Minié rifles then? The reality is that the flintlock musket was invented in 1547 and used until 1848! A full 200 years!

This is terribly written! Get the main character's system straight! Their job is to conquer territory, seize resources, and build up an army! They're just throwing around some militia and peasant association stuff after conquering only one village. They're clearly out of their minds!

In some cases, a feudal monarchy is much stronger than a republic if the monarch is capable enough. The monarch himself holds the greatest power, combining military and political authority, and there is no resistance to anything he does (provided that he is capable enough and that the centralization of power reaches a certain level).

Author, muskets are actually quite easy to counter. Thick wooden planks, heavy infantry, and reinforced battering rams are all effective. Musketeers' advantage lies in their high firepower and ease of training, not their combat effectiveness. Archers and heavy archers are far more lethal and effective than musket wielders. Besides, a volley is not a machine gun, so why equip them with bayonets?