
Dreaming Back to Shenzhen: Laying Low as a Landlord
梦回之苟在深圳做房东
- Status
- Ongoing
- Length
- 3.8M Words
- Genre
- Urban
- Subgenre
- Urban Life
- Updated
- 2y ago
- Source
- Qidian
Stats
1.7kChapters
0Votes
11.2kRecs
110.8kFans
Tags
Synopsis
In booklists 1
Readers also read
Hong Kong Tycoon: 1963
I’m a Cop, Why’d You Give Me an Esports System?
In the Americas, From Security Guard to Call of Duty
There’s a Door in My Warehouse
Forum Troll, Romance Master
After My Divorce, My Luck Took a Turn for the Better
Restarting Life at Twenty
Hong Kong Films: In Wo Hop To, Uncle Deng Begs Me to Take Charge
I’m Not a Suit-Wearing Thug, I’m a Chameleon Actor!
Hello, 1983
Reborn as a Financial Tycoon
International Supplier
Reader comments 23
Google Translate





Until now, there is something that I have always found strange. The author's characterization feels weird. In different interpersonal interactions, the conversation is basically by first name, and it is the full name. Except for the elders, other colleagues, friends, peers or juniors, even lovers, always call the third person by the full name. I have always felt that my tone of voice is stiff and lacks much emotion. Normal interpersonal communication is a little more familiar or I use simplified names for younger people. Most of the three names are called the last two characters. For example, the protagonist calls the heroine Xiao Tingting and basically calls her by her full name. Generally, lovers may call her Tingting or other more intimate names, but the whole text basically calls her by her full name, which makes it feel very weird to read. When we call our daughter, we always call her Xie Weiwei by her full name. Generally, we call our children by their nicknames or simplified names, such as Weiwei, etc. Of course, this is just my personal opinion. I don't know if everyone has this idea.
I didn't see the benefits of Xiao Tingting, so I borrowed 500,000 in the early stage. The Xiao family clings to the male protagonist like a parasite. The stock market depends entirely on the male protagonist. It's like the Xiao family has been reborn. The Xiao family has earned more than 20 million before the protagonist earns much. What I can't stand the most is why I want to get 20% of Xiao Tingting when I set up an investment company. Just because she is a female friend, she is too intellectual, looks cowardly, and a big licker.
Housing with small property rights cannot be built. If you make money, you can cooperate with the super boss in Foshan. If you do private equity and cooperate with Country Garden, how much money should be invested in a project, and the method is open shares and actual debt. You don't want money, you want a house. Specialize in building a model similar to the eggshell apartment. My own house, my own company rents it out and collects rent.
After seeing more than 200 chapters, I won't mention whether it's well written or not. It just feels like the author's world is full of light and no darkness. He is a billionaire and he doesn't even have a bodyguard. And you made so much money from the United States. I think grass has grown on the protagonist's grave. He should have been caught even if he didn't die. It shouldn't be wrong to say that you committed financial crimes and manipulated the stock market, and put a bunch of titles of financial crimes on his head.
The protagonist is really amazing. Even the country has not launched low-rent housing. You have already launched low-rent housing. You are worse than the country.
I have been a bookworm for more than ten years, and after reading too many urban novels, I got tired of it. The first part of this book was okay, but after the daughter came out, the daughter became a slave, and even though the daughter was a slave, she still insisted on getting married and looking for a stepmother. The key point is that the daughter is only eleven years old, but she is very thoughtful. She has made others into marriage-phobic psychosis, and she also forcefully cleanses her daughter. How considerate, and also talks about blood relations. The biggest failure is that an eleven-year-old girl is written more thoroughly than a fifty-year-old adult. Even the protagonist has to be educated by his daughter
The title of the book should not be called "Gou", it should be called "Lang", it is endless, just like a magic stick, publicizing it, and I declare again that I left before finishing the free chapters. If it weren't for some good books about the stock market in the starting point, they would run away and never see each other again. Also, don't set a flag at the beginning and find the wife in the previous life. Isn't it possible that you will open a harem in the future?
I have read several financial novels, but I have never been able to figure out one question. The protagonist has the ability to make money, and is sure to make money without losing money, so why does he have to be so humble? Is this true for private equity? Begging others to invest in you? I find this kind of mentality extremely uncomfortable. The protagonist's position is clearly one of support or disapproval, so why should he be so humble?
The first half of this novel was okay, but the later part, when my daughter was a teenager, was so realistic that I couldn't stand it.
I shouldn't read this book, maybe it's suitable for children. At first, the idea seems to be similar, but I feel like the author is still a child? First, there is an obvious lack of financial knowledge, and there are errors in money perception and basic common sense based on the current specific situation. The most obvious thing is that there are obvious differences in the basic operation and amount of funds, which makes me, a layman, unable to stand it. Second, it becomes more and more obvious in the later stages. Pig's Foot's life and cognition have great limitations. It is biased towards the strengths of the family and the shortcomings of the family. It feels that the author has no direction, just like playing King of Kings for ten minutes and feeling like he has nothing to do. ,,,,,,, The final summary is that the author's initial concept is still good, but he has not learned enough financial knowledge and his vision is not high. I estimate that the author is still young and will be better in the future