The Three Kingdoms: Starting by Saving Cao Cao's Eldest Son
三国从救曹操长子开始
- Status
- Completed
- Length
- 1.4M Words
- Genre
- Historical
- Subgenre
- Alternate History
- Updated
- 3y ago
- English
- Request a translation
Synopsis
Stats
411Chapters
18.9kRecommendations
94.8kFans
More by this author
In booklists 1
Readers also read
Great Han: I Kicked Liu Bang Out of the Car from the Start
Do We Not All Have the Same Blood?
Emperor of Longevity: Emperor Xian of Han
Aren't You the South American Tyrant? Why Are You Fighting the Empire?
Reborn in 1938: I'm Done Being a Landlord
Liu Xie: I Really Just Want to Abdicate!
From the Start, Destined to Be Torn Apart by Tang Taizong's Horses
A Dungeon Just Appeared in My Living Room
Siheyuan: Starting by Picking Up Attributes
My Big Brother Is Called Zhu Chongba
The Grand Strategists' Alliance
Northern Song: The Unrivaled Statesman
Reader comments 42
Google Translate
Sigh, there are actually people who think Romance of the Three Kingdoms is more accurate than historical records. Unbelievable! Romance, to put it simply, is a novel. It was compiled using Chen Shou's "Records of the Three Kingdoms" as its main source material, and also collected folk legends and unofficial histories (that is, historical books not recorded in official records) from various…
It's good, but please reduce the amount of detail about the conspiracies. I prefer to see the protagonist's experiences on the battlefield. Also, the women should be involved, even if it's just briefly mentioned. Otherwise, it'll just be another story where the protagonist is abandoned.
Is writing historical novels to criticize and boycott multiple female leads malicious? Is it because the author is doing too well? The characters are so ambiguous with each other, neither fully committed nor fully committed, acting like paragons of virtue. In real life, no one would act like that. Is this like a eunuch abandoning the story? I find these kinds of novels disgusting.
Historical records describe Liu Bei as a benevolent and virtuous ruler. The inscription says that Zhuge Liang was a loyal and capable minister. Scholars say that Liu Bei was a man of great courage and magnanimity. The textbook says that Zhuge Liang was a man who devoted himself to the cause. People are so clever these days.
Having read up to chapter 85, there are three major flaws: 1. Zhao Yun was granted a marquisate immediately upon arrival, without any fame or military achievements. Why would Cao Cao possibly grant such a title? Zhao Yun himself would not accept such a handout. And what's the point of trying to bribe Zhao Yun?
Most books written by Shu fans perform better than those written by Wei fans. Why is that? Hahahaha
The opening is a bombshell. Anyone with even a basic understanding of the Three Kingdoms period—let's not get to the main point—even just reading *Romance of the Three Kingdoms*, you'll know that Zhang Xiu's rebellion, at its most superficial level—let's not delve into the deeper reasons, but just take the only reason given in your book—was because Cao Cao had slept with his aunt.
Update quickly
Liu Bei was not a hypocrite, and Mengde was a true hero. In fact, Cao Cao was a very capable person, at least a hero. Don't believe those fictional accounts; Cao Cao wasn't a bad person. At the time, Cao Cao represented the side of justice, and the Han Dynasty was in decline.
Strictly speaking, I didn't want to continue watching when I saw that Lü Bu's life was spared for a fictional woman from the Lü family. I really dislike traitors who betray their masters three times; repeated betrayals are not commendable behavior, and such scum is despicable in any era. He deserves to die!