The Three Kingdoms: Starting by Saving Cao Cao's Eldest Son

Hey, some people really think that the Romance of the Three Kingdoms is more realistic than the history books. I am speechless~ The Romance, to put it bluntly, is: a novel. Using Chen Shou's "Three Kingdoms" as the main material, it is compiled by collecting folk legends and unofficial histories of the past dynasties (that is, unofficial history books). Orthodox official history is basically a true historical record. The so-called basic, let's give an example. Why after reading "The Romance of the Three Kingdoms" and then reading "The Chronicle of the Three Kingdoms", I always feel that Zhuge Liang suddenly changed from a saint with a halo of immortality to a straw bag with a wine bag and rice bag. That's not the case, I'm just saying that the difference is huge. Many people agree with this point of view: When Chen Shou was young, he wanted to become Zhuge Liang's teacher, but Zhuge Liang looked down on Chen Shou and refused to accept Chen Shou as his student. So Chen Shouji felt resentful. This also has some basis. For the sake of sales (haha), novels inevitably have to please readers and are a bit sensational. In this way, it is inevitable to add the author's own emotional color, the mainstream opinions of society at that time, and other fictitious things. For example, in "The Romance of the Three Kingdoms": Three Qi Zhou Yu, straw boat borrowing arrows, borrowing the east wind, burning Bowang, empty city strategy, Jiang Qian stealing books, are all not recorded in the "Three Kingdoms", or are quite different from what is recorded in the "Three Kingdoms". There is much more to this. If you want to learn real history, you have to read "Three Kingdoms". Also, why was Luo Guanzhong particularly partial to the Shu Han? This was due to the social pressure of the Ming Dynasty, another hereditary dynasty at that time. The original surname of the Han Dynasty was Liu, so among the princes at that time, Liu Bei was naturally the orthodox. If other surnames want to dominate the Central Plains, they will be treasonous and will be punished by the whole world. Only by Luo Guanzhong writing like this can "The Romance of the Three Kingdoms" not be regarded as an anti-book by the Ming Dynasty and be sold.

It's good to watch, but the plots should be less described. I prefer to see what happens when the protagonist is on the battlefield. Also, women should do it, even if it's just a few sentences, otherwise it's really the protagonist of TJ again.

Is it because I have bad intentions when I write historical novels to complain about and boycott many female protagonists? Is it because I think the author's grades are too good? He keeps flirting with women and refuses to accept them. He behaves like a gentleman. This is not the case in real life. Is this a eunuch? This is the most disgusting kind of novel. Every time there are a lot of people in the comment section complaining about the number of female protagonists, wouldn't it be good to watch female videos that are purely about love?

The history books say that Liu Bei was a kind and virtuous king The inscription says that Kong Ming was a loyal and capable minister The literati said that Liu Bei was a generous and generous man The textbook said that Kong Ming was a dedicated man People nowadays are so smart We can easily see through that Liu Bei is a hypocrite and a good person, and those who are loyal are full of heart and brains. Even those who try their best for Liu Bei can't see through it We can easily see through that Kong Ming is a useless and treacherous minister. Those pen and ink mountains and rivers are capable of poetry and poetry People who praise Kong Ming can't see through it Don't ask Ask and throw Adou just to win people's hearts Ask and ask the eight formations are just useless things Ask and ask Bai Di and Tuogu are all for show and test Ask and bow to the essence, but actually have other plans Ask and ask, history is a little girl who can be dressed up by others Ask, I have independent thinking and don't need to read the literature Take a look at the thatched cottage? Former teacher? What is true temperament? Don't even look at my boss Cao's poems, which are called true temperaments (no intention to target Cao Cao) The hypocrite who led the people across the river, robbed tombs and massacred the city, the true temperament People in the past were still too stupid, why can't they see through things that people today can figure out when they are full It's just the one who made Xin Qiji " The man who was "afraid of being ashamed to see Liu Lang's talent" is called Liu Bei It's just that the man who made Du Fu "make the hero burst into tears" is called Zhuge Liang He was resurrected and helped the people cross the river He devoted himself to death and died Although it will not be as powerful as the unprecedented ones, at least it is not that unbearable. The most shameless person is that he is using street stall literature to refute common sense character design. However, if you argue with him, you will get the sentence "You have read too many novels." So you have to quote scriptures and produce various historical materials to prove that what you are saying is historical facts, and then others say, "Are the history books correct? Aren't they all compiled by the victors?"... So, what else can be said. In order to prove that one's experience is different, one can disdain the Four Great Classics and disbelieve the history books. Whatever others think is what they think. Oh, they also have another characteristic. They like to belittle a household name while at the same time pulling out a historical figure with a lower reputation and more outstanding abilities to praise them. It's like "Zhuge Liang doesn't matter, I know xxx and so on." ​ Reprint

As of Chapter 85, there are three major poisonous points: 1. Zhao Yun was granted the title of Marquis as soon as he came. He has no reputation and no military exploits. How could Cao Cao give it to him? Zhao Yun himself would not accept such charity. Also bribe Zhao Yun? 2. The protagonist, a grain transport officer, has military exploits every time he transports grain. He is the first to defeat Yuan Shu, capture Yuan Shu, and get back the national jade seal (although it is fake) and various materials. Regardless of luck or not, the protagonist should be allowed to fight instead of transporting grain and farming. The author's Cao Cao has no heroic IQ, and the author's writing skills are not good. Not enough, the plot is not very good 3. Afang Gong Fu was impersonated, and a person was inexplicably inserted into the Afang Gong Fu used by the protagonist to increase his reputation. It was also written that the protagonist knew nothing about it. Cao Jie asked the protagonist if he knew the master of Tongbai Zhai. The previous pen name of the protagonist's Afang Gong Fu was from Tongbai Mountain. The protagonist would not be confused or ask more questions? It's obvious that he can pretend to be a prank in front of Cao Jie, but the author doesn't write it, making the protagonist look like a sp.

Most books written by Shu Chui have better grades than those written by Wei Chui. Why is this? Hahahahahaha

The opening of Lightning Strike, let's learn a little bit about the Three Kingdoms. If you don't talk about the real thing, you just go and read The Romance of the Three Kingdoms, and you know that the most superficial reason for Zhang Xiu's rebellion—it goes without saying that it is deep, let's just go by the only reason in your book—the most superficial reason is that Cao Cao fell in love with his aunt. And he was raised by his aunt since he was a child. It can be said that his aunt is equivalent to his mother! His mother was raped, and he became Cao Cao's junior. If he remained indifferent, he would be ridiculed by everyone in the world, and it was impossible to persuade Cao Cao just after he surrendered, so he had no choice but to rebel. If he didn't rebel, his subordinates would rebel against him, so he rebelled. Then, two days later he voted again? Is this a plot that normal people can come up with? The root cause of the rebellion was not resolved, and then surrendered? He has been surrendered again and again, his reputation has been lost, his integrity has been broken, and his situation is worse than if he had not rebelled in the first place. So why did he rebel, just for fun? Wouldn't his subordinates kill him after this? Will Cao Cao spare his life or even use him? Taking such a person under his command would be a blow to his reputation. Is Zhang Xiu worthy enough for Cao Cao to bear this loss willingly? In history, Zhangxiu has indeed declined again, but history has a reason. At that time, Zhang Xiu could be said to be the first of two choices between Cao Cao and Yuan Shao, and as time passed, Cao Cao chose him to marry his aunt. Pushed by multiple reasons, Zhang Xiu surrendered again. It's normal for books to be poisonous, but you are simply off the mark. Is this a plot that normal people can come up with?

Update quickly

Liu Bei is not a hypocrite, Meng De is also a true hero. In fact, Cao Cao is a very capable person, at least a hero. Don't believe those stories, in fact Cao Cao is not bad. At that time, Cao Cao represented the righteous side, and the Han Dynasty was in decline.

Strictly speaking, I don't want to read anymore after seeing Lu Bu's life for a fictional Lu family girl. The slaves of the three surnames really don't like it. Repeated rebellion is not a praiseworthy behavior. This kind of thing is shameless in any era. Better to die than die!